The death of Santino Corleone
#1
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Thread Starter
The death of Santino Corleone
We all see that he was gunned down at the Jones Beach Causeway, we all find out that Carlo Rizzi, his brother-in-law married to his sister Connie, tipped the Tataggia family off after Carlo gave another beating to Connie - Santino flew into a rage when he heard, and raced to beat the shit out of - and possibly murder - Carlo. (Truth is, according to the book, Santino didn't really know how he was gonna handle it - it depended on how bad Connie's condition was. But he wanted this straightened out once and for all, and who can blame him? Some of us have sisters, and we don't want to see them hurt by their husbands.)
What we don't know is that this all started not so much with Carlo beating up Connie, although that was the catalyst that put it into motion. An informer for the Tatagglia Family saw Santino (Sonny) beat up Carlo at Carlo's betting business in Manhattan after Sonny found out about Connie getting beat up by Carlo. It wasn't Carlo who betrayed the Corleone Family (at the time) - it was the informer who saw it, and ran to a telephone to report it. But by the time the informer got to the Top Level of the Tatagglia organization, it was too late - Sonny was already back at the mall on Long Beach, safe.
This was war-time between the Corleones and the Tatagglias, and if they had spotted or caught Sonny in the city, Sonny would have been popped. After the Tatagglias found out from the informer that Sonny threatened to kill Carlo if Carlo beat up Connie again, they knew they had to talk to Carlo, to play against Carlo's emotions, his humiliation not only against getting dehumanized by Sonny in the street (Carlo did not fight back), but the humiliation he felt at his position within the Corleone Family. He wasn't getting the respect he felt he deserved now that he was married to the Corleone daughter - so the Tatagglia's played it up, offered Carlo a "better life" away from the Corleone's. Carlo was dumb enough to think they were telling the truth, so Carlo set it all up. He beat up Connie, he went to his betting business in Manhattan, and made a phone call. He knew that Connie would call Sonny, and he also knew Sonny would come for him.
...but if it hadn't been for the informer, Carlo would not have been a catalyst to the death of Santino Corleone. Does that mean that he didn't deserve to die by the hand of Michael Corleone, years later? I say - he deserved to die. Hell yeah.
But your heart really goes out to Santino, if you read the passage from the book - the moment before he gets shot to smithereens:
And then in the fraction of a second before anything actually happened, Santino Corleone knew he was a dead man. And in that moment his mind was lucid, drained of all violence, as if the hidden fear finally real and present had purified him.
Truth is, when Connie made the call to the Corleone mall, she meant to speak with Tom Hagen, not Sonny. She knew Sonny would kill Carlo, and she didn't want that. She only wanted to be picked up and brought home. But, she got Sonny on the phone instead.
And the rest is history.
What we don't know is that this all started not so much with Carlo beating up Connie, although that was the catalyst that put it into motion. An informer for the Tatagglia Family saw Santino (Sonny) beat up Carlo at Carlo's betting business in Manhattan after Sonny found out about Connie getting beat up by Carlo. It wasn't Carlo who betrayed the Corleone Family (at the time) - it was the informer who saw it, and ran to a telephone to report it. But by the time the informer got to the Top Level of the Tatagglia organization, it was too late - Sonny was already back at the mall on Long Beach, safe.
This was war-time between the Corleones and the Tatagglias, and if they had spotted or caught Sonny in the city, Sonny would have been popped. After the Tatagglias found out from the informer that Sonny threatened to kill Carlo if Carlo beat up Connie again, they knew they had to talk to Carlo, to play against Carlo's emotions, his humiliation not only against getting dehumanized by Sonny in the street (Carlo did not fight back), but the humiliation he felt at his position within the Corleone Family. He wasn't getting the respect he felt he deserved now that he was married to the Corleone daughter - so the Tatagglia's played it up, offered Carlo a "better life" away from the Corleone's. Carlo was dumb enough to think they were telling the truth, so Carlo set it all up. He beat up Connie, he went to his betting business in Manhattan, and made a phone call. He knew that Connie would call Sonny, and he also knew Sonny would come for him.
...but if it hadn't been for the informer, Carlo would not have been a catalyst to the death of Santino Corleone. Does that mean that he didn't deserve to die by the hand of Michael Corleone, years later? I say - he deserved to die. Hell yeah.
But your heart really goes out to Santino, if you read the passage from the book - the moment before he gets shot to smithereens:
And then in the fraction of a second before anything actually happened, Santino Corleone knew he was a dead man. And in that moment his mind was lucid, drained of all violence, as if the hidden fear finally real and present had purified him.
Truth is, when Connie made the call to the Corleone mall, she meant to speak with Tom Hagen, not Sonny. She knew Sonny would kill Carlo, and she didn't want that. She only wanted to be picked up and brought home. But, she got Sonny on the phone instead.
And the rest is history.
#2
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
10 Posts
Re: The death of Santino Corleone
I read the book. I saw the movie. The movie was better. Part III was supposed to be subtitled "The Death Of Michael Corleone."
Incidentally, what is the significance of Tom Hagen's reference to a parked wrecked automobile in the scene where he talks to Kay? ("Oh, that was an accident but nobody was hurt!")
Incidentally, what is the significance of Tom Hagen's reference to a parked wrecked automobile in the scene where he talks to Kay? ("Oh, that was an accident but nobody was hurt!")
#3
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Thread Starter
Re: The death of Santino Corleone
That was an instance where they rolled a car towards the mall with a bomb in it, and it made it through the gates, but nobody was hurt (Tom wasn't lying about that). It was a part of the great mafia war of 1946.
#4
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Thread Starter
Re: The death of Santino Corleone
#5
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 75 clicks above the Do Lung bridge...
Posts: 18,946
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: The death of Santino Corleone
The death of Santino was an add-on that was insisted on by the studio. It was filmed after the film production had wrapped IIRC.
The studio insisted they have a violent gangland-style killing in the movie so Coppola set that scene up. It was not in his original plan for the film, only the vague reference of 'look what they did to my boy' by his dad.
The studio insisted they have a violent gangland-style killing in the movie so Coppola set that scene up. It was not in his original plan for the film, only the vague reference of 'look what they did to my boy' by his dad.
#6
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Thread Starter
Re: The death of Santino Corleone
The death of Santino was an add-on that was insisted on by the studio. It was filmed after the film production had wrapped IIRC.
The studio insisted they have a violent gangland-style killing in the movie so Coppola set that scene up. It was not in his original plan for the film, only the vague reference of 'look what they did to my boy' by his dad.
The studio insisted they have a violent gangland-style killing in the movie so Coppola set that scene up. It was not in his original plan for the film, only the vague reference of 'look what they did to my boy' by his dad.
#10
DVD Talk Limited Edition
#11
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Thread Starter
#12
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The death of Santino Corleone
The death of Santino was an add-on that was insisted on by the studio. It was filmed after the film production had wrapped IIRC.
The studio insisted they have a violent gangland-style killing in the movie so Coppola set that scene up. It was not in his original plan for the film, only the vague reference of 'look what they did to my boy' by his dad.
The studio insisted they have a violent gangland-style killing in the movie so Coppola set that scene up. It was not in his original plan for the film, only the vague reference of 'look what they did to my boy' by his dad.
#14
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Thread Starter
Re: The death of Santino Corleone
With Santino's big heart, I doubt he would have conspired to have Michael killed after Vito's death. The other way around? Look out, Santino.
#15
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
10 Posts
Re: The death of Santino Corleone
However, I do recall that there were additional scenes filmed after principal photography had wrapped for THE GODFATHER PART III, including Joey Zasa's death by Vincent Mancini. That would make more sense.
#17
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The death of Santino Corleone
What, you're telling me that when you read a book about a mob family you didn't want a love story between a disgraced doctor and a bridesmaid with a broken vagina who barely figure into the main plot?
#18
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Thread Starter
Re: The death of Santino Corleone
there are many "books" within the novel of The Godfather. Book II can be skipped, as it deals with Johnny Fontaine and his "buddy" Nino. There's another "book" that deals with the doctor and the wide snapper of Lucy Mancini. The rest of the "books" deal with Michael's plighted exile in Sicily, Don Vito's rise to power (as protrayed in "II"), and all the other rich stories protrayed in I and II.
#19
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The death of Santino Corleone
The Godfather (Vito) would have had a helluva time picking his heir if Santino had not been gunned down. Michael had returned, and with Santino around (the natural heir to becoming Don, although it is not an inherited position by any means) - Vito Corleone would have had to break his and Sonny's heart when he picked Michael to become Don of the Corleone Empire.
With Santino's big heart, I doubt he would have conspired to have Michael killed after Vito's death. The other way around? Look out, Santino.
With Santino's big heart, I doubt he would have conspired to have Michael killed after Vito's death. The other way around? Look out, Santino.
Like you said, Santino better watch his back in that scenario.
#20
Re: The death of Santino Corleone
Carlo still had to account for what he did to Santino. He agreed to the deal, so he gets the garotte.
Oh and here's a behind the scenes pic with fishing wire.
Oh and here's a behind the scenes pic with fishing wire.

#22
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: The death of Santino Corleone
I don't think Vito would have made Michael Don if Sonny had lived. Throughout Michael's life Vito sheltered him from the family business, wanting him to become a senator or something. Vito would have had some degree of solace that Tom would have had an influence on Sonny, keeping him from flying off the handle with bad decisions.
Sonny becoming Don, or Michael becoming Don with Sonny alive is predicated on the gang war not having happened. The events of the war created the Don version of Michael. He was a different person when we first meet him. The flashback scene of the family around the dinner table, everybody still alive, good times, was how he grew up. A lot of his cold bloodedness is rooted in this was taken away from him. He wants to get this back and anything or anybody that threatens this perfect image of the "family" has to be eliminated. Even Kay he ostrisizes(sp?) as an outsider to the family because she doesn't fit his mold as the perfect Don's wife of his memory like him Mom was. All Michael really wants is for everything to be like it was.
He comes to realize at the end of Part II, with the killing of Fredo, that he is the one who has actually destroyed any chance he had for his ideal family.
Sonny becoming Don, or Michael becoming Don with Sonny alive is predicated on the gang war not having happened. The events of the war created the Don version of Michael. He was a different person when we first meet him. The flashback scene of the family around the dinner table, everybody still alive, good times, was how he grew up. A lot of his cold bloodedness is rooted in this was taken away from him. He wants to get this back and anything or anybody that threatens this perfect image of the "family" has to be eliminated. Even Kay he ostrisizes(sp?) as an outsider to the family because she doesn't fit his mold as the perfect Don's wife of his memory like him Mom was. All Michael really wants is for everything to be like it was.
He comes to realize at the end of Part II, with the killing of Fredo, that he is the one who has actually destroyed any chance he had for his ideal family.