Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
#251
DVD Talk Hero
#252
DVD Talk God
Re: Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
http://www.deadline.com/2011/03/fx-a...x-no-1-movies/
If your too lazy to see this and won't pay to rent it either, it will be available free and edited for time on FX in early to mid-2013
If your too lazy to see this and won't pay to rent it either, it will be available free and edited for time on FX in early to mid-2013
#253
Senior Member
Re: Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
For the most part, I enjoyed the hell out of this. I do wish they had spent more time on the initial invasion and beach scenes. The reporter on the beach looked really familiar to me, which bugged me the whole time afterward.
#254
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The lonely depths of my mind
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
People hate it because we've seen it all before. There was nothing new to it. I don't mind them using the same stories over and over as long as they attempt to bring something new to the table. This movie just failed miserably. It wasn't entertaining in the slightest. It was so boring. Like someone that was interviewed in the Indymogul review said, they don't have any content so they cover it up with overused shaky camera work. Alien, which had the same kind of idea, was far better. Independence Day, again with the same idea, was also far better. They may not be the best movies in the world, but at least they were interesting. I'm not saying the movie was bad, but it was boring. Again, if you're going to make a movie with the same story that's been used a million times before, try to do with a little bit of originality. This just didn't do it for me.
#255
DVD Talk God
Re: Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
As I said in my post earlier, my only real problem with the movie was them failing to develop characters that I would care about & remember. Honestly, the only 2 characters that were somewhat memorable were Nantz and Santos. There were several key deaths of people who I could care less about. Bridget Moynahan from Blue Bloods was also in this flick and the previews made her character seem significant, but she did nothing for me story-wise. Any random movie extra could have played that part.
But, from an action & special effects perspective, I think the movie delivered enough of that to keep me entertained.
But, from an action & special effects perspective, I think the movie delivered enough of that to keep me entertained.
#256
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 75 clicks above the Do Lung bridge...
Posts: 18,946
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
Just saw this from Ebert.
@ebertchicago - Box office success of "Battle: Los Angeles" results in loss of millions of hours of human life, dumbing down of audiences.
3 minutes ago via SocialOomph
3 minutes ago via SocialOomph
#258
DVD Talk Legend
#259
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
#260
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
Re: Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
I really liked this movie. If you think that makes me an idiot, then you are a moron. How dare someone impose their opinion onto me as if were fact. I for one have never seen an alien invasion movie from the perspective of ground troops presented as a war movie (someone fill me in if there is one out there), and I thought it really delivered on it's premise. Ok, the dialogue wasn't oscar worthy, but we are talking about a squad of Marines in a war-torn LA; it's gonna be a lot of tactics talk.
Maybe I see things from a different perspective because I spent 6 years in the Army, but I didn't have any problems with the pro-Marine speeches and pep-talks. Sometime you say that stuff to hype yourself up in a crap situation.
Anyway, I had lots of fun with this movie and will buy this on blu- it'll be a helluva sound system workout.
Maybe I see things from a different perspective because I spent 6 years in the Army, but I didn't have any problems with the pro-Marine speeches and pep-talks. Sometime you say that stuff to hype yourself up in a crap situation.
Anyway, I had lots of fun with this movie and will buy this on blu- it'll be a helluva sound system workout.
#261
Senior Member
Re: Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
Just realized that my favorite shot from the trailer, the one of the drones flying against the backdrop of the setting sun, wasn't in the actual film. Either that or I missed it.
#262
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
#263
DVD Talk God
#264
Re: Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
Yeah. I've said it many times before, when he came back from his illness, he seemed to love everything just because he was back to watching films. Now he's back to his large than life persona and letting his own personal biases often ruin things for people. He's often petty and not above blatantly spoiling a movie he dislikes.
I miss Siskel because Siskel would always call him on his crap and vice-versa. The two kept each other's egos relatively in check.
I miss Siskel because Siskel would always call him on his crap and vice-versa. The two kept each other's egos relatively in check.
#265
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
Re: Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
Bah, it's more directed at Ebert and those types (I was speaking in generalities) who think what they say is the fact and if you don't agree then you're stupid. That really irritates me. Opinions are just that. Some people tend to forget.
#266
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
Ah, ok. I do know what you mean, I've enjoyed movies that the majority seemingly disliked.
#267
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 75 clicks above the Do Lung bridge...
Posts: 18,946
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
Yeah Ebert is a terrible judge of film.
The fact that this steaming pile of stupidity is at 32% on RT with over 100 reviews in is pure coincidence.
Ebert's just a bitter man and a poor judge of film.
There are lousy films that I enjoy for various reasons, I just don't feel the need to bullshit myself or others about how lousy they are in the process of enjoying them. Apparently some of you feel differently about that.
The fact that this steaming pile of stupidity is at 32% on RT with over 100 reviews in is pure coincidence.
Ebert's just a bitter man and a poor judge of film.
There are lousy films that I enjoy for various reasons, I just don't feel the need to bullshit myself or others about how lousy they are in the process of enjoying them. Apparently some of you feel differently about that.
#268
Re: Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
Yeah Ebert is a terrible judge of film.
The fact that this steaming pile of stupidity is at 32% on RT with over 100 reviews in is pure coincidence.
Ebert's just a bitter man and a poor judge of film.
There are lousy films that I enjoy for various reasons, I just don't feel the need to bullshit myself or others about how lousy they are in the process of enjoying them. Apparently some of you feel differently about that.
The fact that this steaming pile of stupidity is at 32% on RT with over 100 reviews in is pure coincidence.
Ebert's just a bitter man and a poor judge of film.
There are lousy films that I enjoy for various reasons, I just don't feel the need to bullshit myself or others about how lousy they are in the process of enjoying them. Apparently some of you feel differently about that.
I've reviewed more than a few piles of straight-to-DVD garbage for this site that I know has a fanbase. I've can't recall one time where I've went one step further and said anyone who might enjoy these films are idiots and lack brains. Ebert seems to take pride in casting judgment on a film and then looking down at anyone who doesn't see eye-to-eye with him as less intelligent.
Just remember the man responsible for all this behavior is the screenwriter of "Beyond the Valley of the Dolls"
#269
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
I was going to see this movie no matter what because, like I mentioned before, the trailer absolutely grabbed me and I couldn't wait until it actually came out. The very low rottentomatoes score scared me, but I was willing to overlook it because, at the time, the audience rating was like 85% or something. I was thinking that the snooty critics were just being bitter old men like Ebert and couldn't get past the fact that it was a fun, alien invasion movie. The audience rating is now at 66%. Personally I didn't find it fun at all and fell asleep constantly throughout it and when I was awake I just couldn't get past the utter ridiculousness of the plot points. This movie wasn't Transformers...it wasn't even Independence Day. It was trying to be serious maybe along the lines of Blackhawk Down. A gritty war movie but with aliens instead of Somalians. It completely failed as a serious war movie and it wasn't funny or interesting enough to be a popcorn flick like Transformers or even Independence Day.
I was at least surviving until the absolutely asinine ending.
I was at least surviving until the absolutely asinine ending.
#270
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
I don't have a problem with calling a bad movie a bad movie. I have a problem with him insulting people who choose to see them. I have a problem with him declaring a movie bad and then choosing to spoil a key plot point or finale element just because he doesn't think people should see it.
I've reviewed more than a few piles of straight-to-DVD garbage for this site that I know has a fanbase. I've can't recall one time where I've went one step further and said anyone who might enjoy these films are idiots and lack brains. Ebert seems to take pride in casting judgment on a film and then looking down at anyone who doesn't see eye-to-eye with him as less intelligent.
Just remember the man responsible for all this behavior is the screenwriter of "Beyond the Valley of the Dolls"
I've reviewed more than a few piles of straight-to-DVD garbage for this site that I know has a fanbase. I've can't recall one time where I've went one step further and said anyone who might enjoy these films are idiots and lack brains. Ebert seems to take pride in casting judgment on a film and then looking down at anyone who doesn't see eye-to-eye with him as less intelligent.
Just remember the man responsible for all this behavior is the screenwriter of "Beyond the Valley of the Dolls"
back when i was 12 years old and thought that van damme and Ahnold were the pinnacle of cinematography i also didn't like Ebert
#271
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Playa del Rey, CA
Posts: 2,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#274
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Posts: 34,104
Received 731 Likes
on
533 Posts
Re: Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
I enjoyed it, but yes, someone needs to learn to write better dialog. I was actually fine with the movie and bought into some of it until they decide to take out the command module by themselves. And I would have preferred no back story about the Marines and just get thrust into battle with them.
#275
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Battle: Los Angeles (2011, Dir-Liebesman, Eckhart)
I guess Ebert and other critics should begin every review (and tweet) with an explicitly stated "IN MY OPINION..."? I think that should, and does, go without saying.