You're right. The guy in the middle of the last shot does look like he has been squished.

Suggestion: Can we agree on a new rule, which states that mention should be made if a posted movie isn't shown in its OAR? Who's in favour?

The Mirror Has Two Faces?

Right decade. Wrong Movie. Next two shots (Note that in shot #3, you can see the backs of the main stars):

3)

4)

That Old Feeling (1997)?

Yes, a guilty pleasure I should not like at all yet for some reason, I do.

1)

2)

Dutch?

lol, that was fast, good job!

I just happened to flip by it on cable the other day right at the scene in the homeless shelter (shot #1) otherwise I never would have gotten it.


Give me a little time, I'll see if I can come up with something...

First shot:

#2

The female lead. In real life this actress is married to a well known "sci-fi" actor.

Not The Omen, This movie was made over a decade earlier. Though it could be considered the same genre.

#3

Mute Witness (1994)?

Not Mute Witness, though we are getting closer to the year this film was made.
#4

This film was originally chopped to almost half of its original runtime by the producers and released in Europe. This "Final Cut" is the restored version which was re-cut using the director's own money.

The Candyman (1992)

I'm pretty sure it's Dust Devil. At least, it looks a bit like it.

That it is! Good job, my friend.

Good movie, and I've always found Zakes Mokae cool for some reason.

Wildcard

Damn, I'm away for just a bit and I miss a good one.

It's October, so...

Seven Women For Satan?

Nope. This movie may be best known these days for its use of a filmmaking gimmick.

Can't be right, but I'll throw out Horrors of the Black Museum.

No, but there are similarities between the two films - not the least of which is that said filmmaking gimmick feels almost completely superfluous.