![]() |
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Rypro 525
(Post 10331623)
but since he quoted me, he was able to see the spoiler :lol:
Watch, he's gonna say, "I didn't even look at it when I quoted you. Why I should I look or even notice that the spoiler showed itself when it got quoted? After all, I wasn't responding to what you quoted. I was just making a point that I can respond to a spoiler without reading it." |
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by toddly6666
(Post 10331621)
yay, good boy! very good! Here, have a cookie! You get 3 silver stars!
I loved in the movie how at the end: [spoiler] Right before Stallone kills the villainous, back-stabbing Mickey Rourke, I loved it how he pulls off all of Rourke's fingernails. That was just sick! [\spoiler] Spoiler:
|
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 10331681)
I see what you did there but at least you didn't reveal that Rourke [SPOILER]was Jet Li's father. It was a sad twist that the woman who killed herself was a tryst he had and forgot about. That said, Li was a badass before birth if he survived in his mother's womb after that kind of a fall.[/SPOILER
|
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by KillerCannibal
(Post 10331614)
I still, for the life of me, can't understand why anyone interested in seeing a film would go into the reviews thread after it's opened.
I don't even read reviews before I see I movie. I just glance at the EW grade when it shows up in my mailbox. |
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by toddly6666
(Post 10331693)
Well yes, but there are many interpretations of that. But I don't think she really killed herself. It wasn't clear or not whether it was a dream or reality. Because why would she be jumping out of a window of a different apartment if Stallone entered from a different apartment? If she really killed herself, she would have jumped out of the window of the room that Stallone entered.
|
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
wtf happened here? .....:)
|
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Snake, you do realize the poll can't close until YOU vote?
|
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by toddly6666
(Post 10331632)
ohhhhhh! Touchι! I wonder how D2Cheer is going to rationalize this one! :lol:
Watch, he's gonna say, "I didn't even look at it when I quoted you. Why I should I look or even notice that the spoiler showed itself when it got quoted? After all, I wasn't responding to what you quoted. I was just making a point that I can respond to a spoiler without reading it." But the take away from this is the conversation would be much different if we were in person and you continued to stick your tongue out at me when I told you to shut your piehole about the movie. -wink- see I can use it too! But then again this can be expected from someone who says they would lose respect for their wife if they gained weight. |
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
LOVED it!!
It was everything I hoped it would be. It's the new 'Commando' :) |
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by scott1598
(Post 10331818)
Snake, you do realize the poll can't close until YOU vote?
Originally Posted by Gunde
(Post 10331830)
LOVED it!!
It was everything I hoped it would be. It's the new 'Commando' :) |
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
(Post 10331805)
wtf happened here? .....:)
|
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
lol....
on a much serious note. I've no qualms w/ the way it was shot. It's that damn editing and CGI. That takes a notch down for me. Also...the coloring used in the shots was too dark sometimes. Kinda wish it was the same way it was in the trailer. |
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Ok, I plan on seeing this tomorrow... hope it is not too spoiled for me.
-wink- Time for me to let this go... to me what I read in the post that got this started was a spoiler, was it IDK I will find out tomorrow. However that jackass response I got was out of line no matter how it was intended. nuff said on this I will post my review when I get back. From what I have read it sounds like I should enjoy it. |
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by d2cheer
(Post 10331819)
That is right I didn't look at it.
But the take away from this is the conversation would be much different if we were in person and you continued to stick your tongue out at me when I told you to shut your piehole about the movie. -wink- see I can use it too! But then again this can be expected from someone who says they would lose respect for their wife if they gained weight. You are fat. |
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
.....*raises eyebrow*....I am not fat. I am merely husky. That's why my shorts used to say. Damnit.
|
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
(Post 10331855)
lol....
on a much serious note. I've no qualms w/ the way it was shot. It's that damn editing and CGI. That takes a notch down for me. Also...the coloring used in the shots was too dark sometimes. Kinda wish it was the same way it was in the trailer. |
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
over-the-top? yes, of course. Blood not needed? ehhhhh...if it was squibs I'd be more happy. It's the CGI blood flying...just is too shiny, w/ a heavy solid look to them, and also doesn't "jump" out that well to convince me it's "blood".
|
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 10331907)
The color timing didn't bother me and, although I think the camera could have been pulled back a few feet, I was mostly content with the shot compositions. But the godawful editing killed the action sequences. Not all the CGI was terrible (the hallway CGI was acceptable and necessary) but the CGI blood was silly. As Giantrobo said, most of the action was so over-the-top, the blood wasn't even needed.
1.) Stallone needs a new cinematographer who doesn't completely rely on color grading. 2.) If you are going to hire a cinematographer who sucks at his job at least give the colorist 4k scans so he has enough information to work with with out making the image incredibly grainy. |
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by toddly6666
(Post 10331889)
If we (as in everyone in this thread) were all talking about this movie in person, you would be the asshat that tries to join in the conversation and tell everyone to not talk about the movie anymore because u didnt see the movie, and u wouldnt even walk away - u would stand in front of everyone's conversation and put your fingers in your ear, making noise to not hear the conversation.
You are fat. |
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Mod Note: Everyone needs to cool their jets. The next instance I see of name-calling from any side results in an immediate suspension. In fact, there's no need to discuss this subject any more. Spoiler tags are useful, but this deep into a review thread, it's not expected that every single element of the film will require a spoiler tag.
If we can't get this thread back on track, I will close out and discipline any responsible members. |
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
So... how about that shotgun scene, eh? Great stuff.
|
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Blu Man
(Post 10331920)
This film is the perfect example of why 4k D.I.'s should become the standard. The whole film is grainy as shit because they decided to massively fuck with the colors in post, and the low light shots are just embarrassingly bad. The opening scene looked amateur.
1.) Stallone needs a new cinematographer who doesn't completely rely on color grading. 2.) If you are going to hire a cinematographer who sucks at his job at least give the colorist 4k scans so he has enough information to work with with out making the image incredibly grainy. But what really got stuck in my head was the DV cam (or whatever they used) cityscape shot before we first see Rourke. What was up with that? :whofart:
Originally Posted by KillerCannibal
(Post 10331952)
So... how about that shotgun scene, eh? Great stuff.
|
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 10331957)
The super grainy look didn't bug me but the shot compositions before we see the team did bring to mind the amateur feel you were talking about. I thought it was intentional but it didn't really jive with most of the rest of the film.
But what really got stuck in my head was the DV cam (or whatever they used) cityscape shot before we first see Rourke. What was up with that? :whofart: Terry Crews explanation of noise and the amunition beforehand helped sell it. However, Steve Austin's WTF face really sealed the deal. Great stuff. :lol: |
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 10331957)
But what really got stuck in my head was the DV cam (or whatever they used) cityscape shot before we first see Rourke. What was up with that? :whofart:
|
Re: The Expendables (Stallone, 2010) The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by toddly6666
(Post 10331693)
Well yes, but there are many interpretations of that. But I don't think she really killed herself. It wasn't clear or not whether it was a dream or reality. Because why would she be jumping out of a window of a different apartment if Stallone entered from a different apartment? If she really killed herself, she would have jumped out of the window of the room that Stallone entered.
Now, THAT's the movie INCEPTION should have been. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.