![]() |
Re: Oliver Stone
Originally Posted by JimRochester
(Post 10333885)
I liked the thought proking JFK however many of his points are too easily contradicted. I am one that believes LHO had help and I still saw huge holes in some of the points presented in an overly long film.
|
Re: Oliver Stone
Originally Posted by Buttmunker
(Post 10334526)
no group of top-level conspirators would ever employ someone as unstable and unreliable as Oswald to commit the biggest murder in history, no such group would ever provide its hit man with, or allow him to use, a twelve-dollar rifle to get the job done, and any such group would help its hit man escape or have a car waiting for him to drive him to his death, not allow him to be wandering out in the street, catching cabs and buses to get away, as we know Oswald did.
|
Re: Oliver Stone
Originally Posted by Buttmunker
(Post 10333865)
I always liked JFK, too, until I was educated enough to realize that the slant Stone took with his film was biased towards DA Jim Garrison. And the fact that he named the film JFK without the film being about the man's life, but about the circumstances upon which the man died. The film is solid entertainment, but from a historical perspective, it severely lacks. And the side-effect of Jim Garrison being discredited by the world doesn't help the film, either. But since Stone doesn't believe Garrison to be almost criminal of his prosecution of Clay Shaw, I guess we have to just sit tight in our assurances that we somehow know better.
Also, I love Born on the Fourth of July. It's one of the few disability films I can ever remember watching which doesn't patronise or demean it's subject. Powerful stuff. However my favourite of Stone's is Any Given Sunday. Not for any particular artistic genius, but simply because I love watching it - particularly with a group of mates. |
Re: Oliver Stone
Originally Posted by JumpCutz
(Post 10317605)
JFK is a brilliant film. The acting, directing, editing, production design, cinematography and score far surpass those same elements in Wall Street.
After trying unsuccessfully to rewatch Alexander the other day (which I initially enjoyed despite it's obvious shortcomings) I realized just how few Stone films I actually like. |
Re: Oliver Stone
Originally Posted by Buttmunker
(Post 10334526)
no group of top-level conspirators would ever employ someone as unstable and unreliable as Oswald to commit the biggest murder in history, no such group would ever provide its hit man with, or allow him to use, a twelve-dollar rifle to get the job done, and any such group would help its hit man escape or have a car waiting for him to drive him to his death, not allow him to be wandering out in the street, catching cabs and buses to get away, as we know Oswald did.
|
Re: Oliver Stone
Originally Posted by troystiffler
(Post 10311175)
I like most of Stone's movies.
I love Natural Born Killers' complete disregard of traditional conventions. The psycho violence is respectfully justified. Everyone was directed to be such loons. There's not a single relatedly-normal character in the whole movie. |
Re: Oliver Stone
Originally Posted by Abob Teff
(Post 10335817)
Ahhh ... but that's what makes it such a f%^$ing brilliant plan! (All due respect, you suck as a conspiracy theorist.) :tinfoil:
|
Re: Oliver Stone
Oswald was stupid. He might have had a better chance of escape if he had done some of the following: 1) planted the rifle in the warehouse days before the president's arrival, this way no witnesses would have remembered you bringing in "curtain rods" on the day of. 2) worn rubber gloves to avoid fingerprints on the rifle. 3) thrown the rifle out the window so it would have broken apart, and retrieved the spent shells on the floor. That way, nobody would have pinpointed the exact location of the shooter.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. Bet Oswald wishes he had hindsight. |
Re: Oliver Stone
HAd he been the shooter yes, but since the CIA did the shooting and set him up then they needed all that evidence left behind. ;)
Actually my biggest problems with the lone gunman theory were: Why did Oswald wait until the car was heading away from him, thereby making the target smaller with each passing second? It has been part of testimony but never explained about people near the grassy knoll producing badges to the beat cops even though there were no undercover or federal agents supposed to be in the area. |
Re: Oliver Stone
Originally Posted by JimRochester
(Post 10338941)
Why did Oswald wait until the car was heading away from him, thereby making the target smaller with each passing second? |
Re: Oliver Stone
I voted for Platoon in the poll, but JFK is right up there too.
|
Re: Oliver Stone
Originally Posted by Buttmunker
(Post 10334526)
the biggest murder in history
|
Re: Oliver Stone
Oliver Stone's JFK had a clip of young Jack Kennedy in the late 1930's give a little "hip-push" to (I think) his sister Kick. I don't believe I've ever seen that clip in any of the documentaries on JFK's youth portion. Nice job, Oliver!
|
Re: Oliver Stone
^what about the times when everyone wore robes. those were big
|
Re: Oliver Stone
Originally Posted by Buttmunker
(Post 10333865)
For years, I always held Born on the Fourth of July in great esteem, mostly because the performance given by Tom Cruise was top-notch, but mostly because it told a story without the strange imagery that Stone became famous for in the 1990s and 2000s.
|
Re: Oliver Stone
Originally Posted by FRwL
(Post 10339458)
^what about the times when everyone wore robes. those were big
Are you referring to Lynchings? |
Re: Oliver Stone
I mean ancient times
|
Re: Oliver Stone
Ah, the Gladiators. Bet they weren't so "glad" to be "glad"iators. Rough times, indeed. But none of them were "famous." Not even the guys who got lynched were "famous." JFK was famous. That was a Big Murder. Big difference.
|
Re: Oliver Stone
Originally Posted by Buttmunker
(Post 10340833)
Ah, the Gladiators. Bet they weren't so "glad" to be "glad"iators. Rough times, indeed. But none of them were "famous." Not even the guys who got lynched were "famous." JFK was famous. That was a Big Murder. Big difference.
|
Re: Oliver Stone
Originally Posted by Burnt Thru
(Post 10342044)
Ceasar
|
Re: Oliver Stone
Let's not forget he also wrote the screenplay for Conan the Barbarian (with John Milius). Apparently his original "solo" screenplay was filled with epic bad assedness that was too expensive to film.
Despite the haters I think Platoon was the best Vietnam war movie made. Seeing it in the theater as a teen ager really affected me. |
Re: Oliver Stone
Platoon.
|
Re: Oliver Stone
Originally Posted by troystiffler
(Post 10311175)
I love Natural Born Killers' complete disregard of traditional conventions. The psycho violence is respectfully justified. Everyone was directed to be such loons. There's not a single relatedly-normal character in the whole movie.
The art direction was top-notch. The feel and the music and everything is just really entertaining. I know that it has it's satirical message. And you're not really supposed to be having a good time. You're supposed to be dignified and shit and have an objective viewpoint. But I just think it's a super fun time. I guess I'm just one of the dummies who gives into the escapistic violence that the message of the movie opposes. I agree,it is a fun entertaining wild film. Tommy Lee Jones is a riot as the warden. I don't think anyone who likes the film is looking for any 'message' in it and just enjoys how wild and crazy it is. If i recall,Stone was intending to make a 'summer action blockbuster' type film with it from interviews at the time('just sit back and enjoy the ride'), so any message is really superficial at best. So I don't think anyone should feel 'bad' for enjoying the film and finding it entertaining,since what did Stone expect with such a quirky tone? |
Re: Oliver Stone
Platoon
|
Re: Oliver Stone
Natural Born Killers.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:57 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.