![]() |
Oscar snubbs
Watchmen should have been nominated (and won) for these categories:
Best Film Best Supporting Actor (Jackie Earl Haley)* Best Cinematography *well to be fair, Waltz was very good too so this could have been a coin flip Any other obvious snubbs this year? |
Re: Oscar snubbs
I think Michael Stuhlbarg deserved a nomination for A Serious Man.
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
I loved Watchmen, but I only agree that Haley should have been nominated for Best Supporting Actor. Waltz should win.
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
Tilda Swinton for Julia.
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
Tilda Swinton (Actress) for Julia
Mélanie Laurent (Actress) for Inglourious Basterds Sam Rockwell (Actor) for Moon Matt Damon (Actor) for The Informant! Where the Wild Things Are (Art Direction) Drag Me to Hell (Sound Mixing) The Coen Bros (Directing) |
Re: Oscar snubbs
Acting:
Michael Stuhlbarg for A Serious Man, Peter Capaldi for In the Loop, Sam Rockwell for Moon, and Mélanie Laurent for Inglourious Basterds. Directing: Joel and Ethan Coen for A Serious Man and Michael Haneke for The White Ribbon. |
Re: Oscar snubbs
Star Trek - Best Picture :D
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by Gdrlv
(Post 10020876)
I loved Watchmen, but I only agree that Haley should have been nominated for Best Supporting Actor. Waltz should win.
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
The Messenger
-Best Picture -Best Director -Supporting Actress for Samantha Morton |
Re: Oscar snubbs
I am still hurting that Keenan and Kell were snubbed for Good Burger. Hell, the whole film was snubbed.
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
If Watchmen was snubbed for anything, it was the Golden Raspberries.
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by RichC2
(Post 10020882)
Matt Damon (Actor) for The Informant!
I think similar things happened with Tommy Lee Jones when he was nominated for In the Valley of Elah and also appeared in No Country for Old Men. And DiCaprio's performance in The Departed may have helped him get in for Blood Diamond. Seems like voters take those into consideration if someone has a really good year. |
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by Groucho
(Post 10020985)
If Watchmen was snubbed for anything, it was the Golden Raspberries.
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by hapgilmore
(Post 10020856)
Watchmen should have been nominated (and won) for these categories:
Best Film Best Supporting Actor (Jackie Earl Haley) Best Cinematography
Originally Posted by hapgilmore
(Post 10021035)
Feel free to leave this thread hater, Watchmen is a masterpiece.
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
(Post 10020979)
The Messenger
-Best Picture -Best Director -Supporting Actress for Samantha Morton |
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by hapgilmore
(Post 10021035)
Feel free to leave this thread hater, Watchmen is a masterpiece.
^I haven't seen Messenger yet, but I didn't care for Daniels direction in Precious. He did a great job with his actors, not so much with everything else. |
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by RichC2
(Post 10021089)
Masterpiece? :lol: You should have just made a "Watchmen got snubbed!" thread instead of an all inclusive Oscar thread. The movie it too ripe for ridicule.
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
Best Supporting Actor: Jackie Earle Haley (Watchmen)
Best Actor: Matt Damon (The Informant!) Best Picture: Black Dynamite Best Picture: The Informant! Best Director: Steven Soderbergh (The Informant!) Best Original Score: Marvin Hamlisch (The Informant!) Best Original Score: Adrian Younge (Black Dynamite) |
Re: Oscar snubbs
I am of the belief that a picture is a thousand words.
Well this one is five in particular: http://www.thecinemapost.com/wp-cont...ntichrist2.jpg Best Actress: Charlotte Gainsbourg, Antichrist |
Re: Oscar snubbs
A Single Man should have been nominated for Best Picture.
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by ReduxGuy
(Post 10021178)
I am of the belief that a picture is a thousand words.
Well this one is five in particular: http://www.thecinemapost.com/wp-cont...ntichrist2.jpg Best Actress: Charlotte Gainsbourg, Antichrist |
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by DonnachaOne
(Post 10021076)
Watchmen isn't quite trash, but the idea of even considering the film for Best Picture is laughable, and considering the dozens of better films in 2009, a bit insulting.
The thread is asking for Oscar Snubs and isn't specifically a Watchmen thread. Please don't threadcrap. I didn't threadcrap, groucho did, and I started the thread so i can praise Watchmen as much as I please. |
Re: Oscar snubbs
mark my words, no movie that ends with a song by my chemical romance will ever win best picture.
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
To be fair, Watchmen might have been Best Picture material, but it was brought down by the bad cinematography and the poor portrayal of Rorschach.
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by hapgilmore
(Post 10021369)
I didn't threadcrap, groucho did, and I started the thread so i can praise Watchmen as much as I please.
I don't think Watchmen was snubbed. I thought it was shit. So there. |
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by Jason
(Post 10021123)
Ever since I've seen it, I've been torn between thinking Watchmen was either an ambitious but flawed masterpiece or pretentious horseshit. I've been leaning more and more towards the latter.
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by RichC2
(Post 10021542)
IMO, could have been a "genre masterpiece" if they made an actual movie out of it instead of making what felt like a read along supplement to better material.
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
Heh, the academy loves their underdog movies (Blindside, Precious) and Precious was required to take the requisite "Sundance movie that won everybody's heart." even if it wasn't so great.
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by RichC2
(Post 10020882)
Sam Rockwell (Actor) for Moon
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
I'd go with Star Trek for Best Picture. In fact, take all of Avatar's nominations and replace them with Star Trek and that would be much better.
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
To be fair, this year looks pretty pathetic. They up it to 10 films for Best Picture, yet include crap like 'The Blind Side', Avafreakinretard, Up, and District 9.
I would have taken these out for sure with the possible removal of The Hurt Locker and Precious. For me the AA's looks very amateurish this year and in no way has distinguished itself from the usually goofy GG's. If 'A Serious Man' happens to pull off the surprise win, I may recant. |
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by foofighters7
(Post 10021666)
Avafreakinretard
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by troystiffler
(Post 10021675)
You are very clever.
go here. http://images.dvdtalk.com/images/smilies/sarcasm.gif |
Re: Oscar snubbs
Sam Rockwell should have
Spoiler:
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by foofighters7
(Post 10021666)
To be fair, this year looks pretty pathetic. They up it to 10 films for Best Picture, yet include crap like 'The Blind Side', Avafreakinretard, Up, and District 9.
I would have taken these out for sure with the possible removal of The Hurt Locker and Precious. For me the AA's looks very amateurish this year and in no way has distinguished itself from the usually goofy GG's. If 'A Serious Man' happens to pull off the surprise win, I may recant. |
Re: Oscar snubbs
Snubbs and Crockett - They're cops!
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by whoopdido
(Post 10025223)
Congratulations on not liking all the commercially successful movies of the year.
Is this what your point was? |
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by foofighters7
(Post 10025313)
You seem to equate commercial success to quality?
Is this what your point was? I find it strange that some people seem to think of it as a badge of honor to NOT like movies that everybody else does. |
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by hapgilmore
(Post 10021369)
Really, The Blind Side was a better film? Really?
Originally Posted by hapgilmore
(Post 10021369)
I didn't threadcrap, groucho did, and I started the thread so i can praise Watchmen as much as I please.
|
Re: Oscar snubbs
Originally Posted by foofighters7
(Post 10021685)
Thank you oh so very much. You truly are a king among men.
go here. http://images.dvdtalk.com/images/smilies/sarcasm.gif |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:18 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.