![]() |
Actors you're not sure about
Who are some actors you're not sure are good or not? One that comes to mind is C. Thomas Howell. I honestly can't tell if this guy is really bad, or just really real acting.
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Val Kilmer.
http://media.herald-dispatch.com/blo...mer-742605.jpg He absolutely owned "Tombstone" and "Real Genius", but he's also given some real shit performances in many a shit movie. |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by TallGuyMe
(Post 9837226)
Val Kilmer.
http://media.herald-dispatch.com/blo...mer-742605.jpg He absolutely owned "Tombstone" and "Real Genius", but he's also given some real shit performances in many a shit movie. However, when he's in a good film, he's outstanding: Like you mentioned "Tombstone" and "Real Genius" Don't forget: Heat Kiss Kiss Bang Bang Spartan Willow The Doors Ghost in the Darkness |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Peter Sarsgaard
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Brad Pitt. He seems to be the same guy in every single movie.
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by tofu
(Post 9837392)
Brad Pitt. He seems to be the same guy in every single movie.
I'd say Clive Owen is the perfect example for me. I want to love the guy, but man he picks some shitty movies. |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Brad Pitt (INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS included!). The only thing I really liked him in was OCEAN'S 11, and only because I thought he worked well with Clooney and that the two should have made a western.
Johnny Depp. I had such high hopes for him in PUBLIC ENEMIES, given that he struck me as the absolute best choice to play Dillinger among current actors, and he wound up doing a poor job, although I think it may have been a case of the director not doing his job well enough and saddling him with a badly cast leading lady. But when I think back to past Depp performances, all I can think of as any good was ED WOOD, but even there, Depp didn't even begin to capture the quirkiness and eccentricities of the real Wood. Was it a case of the actor simply not being able to go far enough or the director holding him back? Tom Hanks. The only performance of his I was impressed with was SAVING PRIVATE RYAN. But give me a break with CASTAWAY, FORREST GUMP, PHILADELPHIA, SLEEPLESS IN SEATTLE and...what else is he famous for these days? Oh, yeah, THE TERMINAL, a horrible movie and one of the worst leading actor performances of the last 20 years. Don't get me started. |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
No one else could have pulled off JOE VS. THE VOLCANO except Tom Hanks.
Also: Mark Wahlberg. Here is a guy who was SO outstanding in "The Departed" and "Boogie Nights", and an ABSOLUTE PIECE OF SHIT IN EVERYTHING ELSE. I'm not talking just OK, decent, whatever, I mean a FUCKING AWFUL ACTOR. I guess abs can take you far in this world. |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
(Post 9837821)
Also: Mark Wahlberg. Here is a guy who was SO outstanding in "The Departed" and "Boogie Nights", and an ABSOLUTE PIECE OF SHIT IN EVERYTHING ELSE. I'm not talking just OK, decent, whatever, I mean a FUCKING AWFUL ACTOR. I guess abs can take you far in this world.
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by Sessa17
(Post 9837456)
I'd say Clive Owen is the perfect example for me. I want to love the guy, but man he picks some shitty movies.
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Have you guys that said Brad Pitt seen Kalifornia. Like nothing he's done since.
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Viggo Mortensen
Clive Owen 2 of the blandest, nondescript actors I've ever seen. |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by Rad14
(Post 9838791)
Viggo Mortensen
Clive Owen 2 of the blandest, nondescript actors I've ever seen. |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by Rad14
(Post 9838791)
Viggo Mortensen
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by Sessa17
(Post 9839178)
Couldn't disagree more on Viggo. He is brilliant in Eastern Promises. Should have won the Oscar that year for it.
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by Rad14
(Post 9838791)
Viggo Mortensen
Clive Owen 2 of the blandest, nondescript actors I've ever seen. |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by jeffbase34
(Post 9838835)
More bland than Paul Walker?
is THAT even possible... ;) |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by jeffbase34
(Post 9838835)
More bland than Paul Walker?
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
whats with the hate on pitt? c'mon the guy has a reeal respectable resume...
fight club snatch seven inglourious basters to just name a few.... |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
(Post 9839188)
A great performance, but also an exception. Why does he insist on mumbling all his lines? :(
Originally Posted by jmu878
whats with the hate on pitt? c'mon the guy has a reeal respectable resume...
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
I don't watch any Paul Walker movies so I can't comment on him, and I haven't seen Eastern Promises so I can't comment there either (I gave up watching Viggo years ago!).
Sorry but I consider both Viggo Mortensen and Clive Owen to be overrated. You can throw in Mark Wahlberg and Christian Bale into that category too. All of them are the same in every movie IMHO, bland, wooden and nondescript. And these are major players too, starring in some of the biggest movies over recent years!! |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
I am starting to have some serious doubts about Christian Bale, Rescue Dawn wasn't bad, but disappointing for a Herzog movie and I think The Prestige is brilliant.... other than that, he hasn't been great in anything as of recent.
Also, Casey Affleck... his career is still relatively young (at least as a leading man). Really though, he was perfectly cast in Assassination of JJ and moderately successful in Gone Baby Gone, but I'm not sure he has a range beyond what I've seen so far. I lost hope in Ed Norton a long time ago. And finally, I want to defend Wahlberg's performances in Three Kings and I Heart Huckabee's (a flawed movie sure, but his part really played to his strengths and I thought he was quite good). Viggo is pretty great all around. |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Tobey Maguire, although I think I'm pretty sure he just sucks.
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
I almost forgot, Hugh Jackman. Wooden and bland also!
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
The Brad Pitt comments are shocking to me.
Curious Case of Benjamin Button, Snatch., Seven, Fight Club, Twelve Monkeys, Ocean's, Burn After Reading, Babel, Inglourious Basterds, Kalifornia, etc. etc. are all varied roles and varied characters that he played uniquely. |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
I find most of the choices in this thread shocking. A lot these guys do play similar roles, but that's because that's what they're offered. You become famous for a certain role and someone wants you you play a similar role. All of them at some point have shown some great range, even if they don't so much anymore or not for a while.
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by Rad14
(Post 9840752)
I almost forgot, Hugh Jackman. Wooden and bland also!
Fox will back up a dumptruck full of cash for him to continue doing Wolverine movies, but I'd rather see him walk away from that role forever after the twin crapfests of X-Men: The Last Stand and Wolverine. On the other hand, I thought he was exceptional in "The Prestige" and extraordinarily good in "The Fountain". |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by GreenVulture
(Post 9839542)
That doesn't mean he's good in them. Do I have to explain my Brad Pitt Theory again?
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
if I were to defend Brad Pitt, IF, I would use Kalifornia, 12 Monkeys, and Seven as my examples.
he doesn't make films unwatchable to me and I don't hate him, as he has his hand in some real quality movies, regardless of his performance in each. I wouldn't call him an excellent actor. Just someone who I think used his level of power wisely, and made and extreme profitable career while retaining credibility. He such a Nancy though... :) Patrick Wilson. Loved Little Children, liked Hard Candy, hated Watchmen. Hope he picks some good roles in the future, but can't exactly tell if he has anything to bring to the table. His casting in Little Children was perfect, but the character was a clutz, so maybe he's another Keanu or something. |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
I'll echo the Brad Pitt comments. I'll also say Tom Cruise. He's made some good movies, but he's himself in every film.
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Kristen Stewart, but I'm sure she's bad and shouldn't be as popular as she is.
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by Terrell
(Post 9841664)
I'll echo the Brad Pitt comments. I'll also say Tom Cruise. He's made some good movies, but he's himself in every film.
I consider him to have an excellent resume, supported by three Best Actor/Supporting nominations. His personal antics have overshadowed this, which is a shame, because he's given many good performances in some great films. Even his huge blockbusters have a certain "quality" to them. He recruits the best, and has a knack for working with some of Hollywood greatest current directors. I do not work for Tom Cruise, btw, he gives me the creeps! |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by AnonomusBob15
(Post 9841169)
if I were to defend Brad Pitt, IF, I would use Kalifornia, 12 Monkeys, and Seven as my examples.
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
my youtube attention span runs at about 45 seconds, is it really funny or something?
|
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by AnonomusBob15
(Post 9841169)
if I were to defend Brad Pitt, IF, I would use Kalifornia, 12 Monkeys, and Seven as my examples.
he doesn't make films unwatchable to me and I don't hate him, as he has his hand in some real quality movies, regardless of his performance in each. I wouldn't call him an excellent actor. Just someone who I think used his level of power wisely, and made and extreme profitable career while retaining credibility. He such a Nancy though... :) Patrick Wilson. Loved Little Children, liked Hard Candy, hated Watchmen. Hope he picks some good roles in the future, but can't exactly tell if he has anything to bring to the table. His casting in Little Children was perfect, but the character was a clutz, so maybe he's another Keanu or something. I would throw in Babel as well. I thought his performance was powerful in that film. |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by AnonomusBob15
(Post 9842162)
my youtube attention span runs at about 45 seconds, is it really funny or something?
But I do agree, that ending scene is weakened somewhat by Pitt's performance. I don't really have anything against Pitt, though. There is a place for the "movie star" type in Hollywood and I think he fits the role pretty well. I think he's fine in Ocean's (which isn't anything that requires much ability beyond a little charisma) and sometimes knocks it out of the park like, for instance, in 12 Monkey's. |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
(Post 9837821)
No one else could have pulled off JOE VS. THE VOLCANO except Tom Hanks.
Also: Mark Wahlberg. Here is a guy who was SO outstanding in "The Departed" and "Boogie Nights", and an ABSOLUTE PIECE OF SHIT IN EVERYTHING ELSE. I'm not talking just OK, decent, whatever, I mean a FUCKING AWFUL ACTOR. I guess abs can take you far in this world. |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by John Slider
(Post 9840844)
The Brad Pitt comments are shocking to me.
Curious Case of Benjamin Button, Snatch., Seven, Fight Club, Twelve Monkeys, Ocean's, Burn After Reading, Babel, Inglourious Basterds, Kalifornia, etc. etc. are all varied roles and varied characters that he played uniquely. |
Re: Actors you're not sure about
Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
(Post 9844777)
Doesn't mean he played them well. He has a tendency to overact, to pitch his performance a little too much in one direction or another, diminishing the character's believability. Sometimes you need to tone it down and let the eyes do the talking and let the camera pick it up. Of the films you list, I only thought he was good in OCEAN'S and only because, as Clooney's chief sidekick, he had to play a straight man rather than a "top banana."
It's like when people criticize Nicholson in The Shining. You might not like it, but it is exactly what Kubrick wanted, he wanted it over the top. So in that instance I wouldn't say there is overacting, overacting is a film to film thing. I think every director gets exactly what they want out of Pitt, and he has showed some pretty good range over his career. I wouldn't say he's great but he is solid. And I know what to expect from Pitt when he's in a film. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.