|
Re: Transformers 3{2011}
Originally Posted by j123vt_99
(Post 9330927)
I hear Megan Fox gets naked in the 3rd movie
|
Re: Transformers 3{2011}
Originally Posted by j123vt_99
(Post 9330927)
I hear Megan Fox gets naked in the 3rd movie
Naw some new chick. Megan Fox will be old and busted by 2011. |
Re: Transformers 3{2011}
I hear Sam's dad gets ripped in half by Ravage and another Decepticon in this one. ;)
|
Re: Transformers 3{2011}
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 9330736)
Why? A crossover happened in the comics. Lennox in Transformers is a Joe from one of the G.I. Joe/Transformers comics. I think it's fair to say the writers were preparing to leave the door open for this.
It could be fun so I'd definitely want to see a crossover. |
Re: Transformers 3{2011}
I don't get the problem. G.I. Joe wasn't exactly 100% realistic in the comics or cartoons. The movie looks to be over the top action. The Transformers live action movie had over the top action. It's not too outlandish to mix the two.
This isn't like trying to do a Superman/Batman film with the Nolanverse version of Batman. Given how much the Nolanverse strives for believabilty and realism (well, to a point), having Batman meet an alien that is nigh invincible unless attacked by magic or glowing green rocks wouldn't make much sense. A G.I. Joe/Transformers crossover would make sense. |
Re: Transformers 3{2011}
Eh, I thought the GI Joe trailer looked pretty darn silly. I'm just not interested. It feels too geeky even for me.
|
Re: Transformers 3{2011}
GI Joe looks terrible. I wouldn't want the universe Sommers is creating to touch another Transfomers movie.
|
Re: Transformers 3{2011}
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 9330675)
Another typical action movie??? And were you expecting some David Mamet dialogue or something? It's Michael Bay + CG Robots....what do you think? Part 2 is gonna make a shit load of money, the DVD's and Blu Rays will make a shit load of money and the toys and Part 3 will probably do the same.
I'm in for Part 2, 3, 4 or however many movies they make. |
Re: Transformers 3{2011}
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
(Post 9330686)
Is this post a joke? I can't tell. I hope it is.
|
Re: Transformers 3{2011}
I'm surprised that many of you thought GI Joe looked silly from the trailer and somehow thought that the first Transformers movie was better in tone. I'm with RocShemp on this, the two seemed pretty similar to me and a crossover would be easy.
|
Re: Transformers 3{2011}
Oh nononono. Regardless of how silly TF1 was there is no comparing anything Michael Bay has done to anything Stephen Sommers has done. I'm not a Bay fan or apologist by any means, but Sommers is a total hack with a bad-CGI fetish. G.I. Joe will suck ultimate ass purely because it's his film.
|
Re: Transformers 3{2011}
Originally Posted by KillerCannibal
(Post 9334225)
Oh nononono. Regardless of how silly TF1 was there is no comparing anything Michael Bay has done to anything Stephen Sommers has done. I'm not a Bay fan or apologist by any means, but Sommers is a total hack with a bad-CGI fetish. G.I. Joe will suck ultimate ass purely because it's his film.
|
Re: Transformers 3{2011}
Bay has already stated that if DreamWorks is gunning for a 2011 release, then they have to count him out. [He'll be down for 2012 as he needs a "year off."]
To be honest, if the sequel is as over bloated as the first one (odds are yes with Ehren Kruger writing), just reboot the entire franchise for round three. Don't get me wrong, I love me some Bay; but Transformers was too bloated and an hour too long. |
Re: Transformers 3{2011}
Yeah, Shia tweeted that 2012 was a more accurate date and 2011 was not happening.
|
Re: Transformers 3{2011}
Originally Posted by Joshsuth1
(Post 9334784)
I hear Dumbledore dies in this one!
|
Transformers 3 Announced
who didn't see this coming, i mean the series has only made 1.5 billion worldwide
Director says next 'bot sequel due out in 2011. by Jim Vejvoda October 1, 2009 - Giant f*****g robots will storm back into theaters come summer 2011, so sayeth director Michael Bay. The Transformers series director made the following announcement today at his official site: "Well its official: We have a great Transformers 3 story. The release date is now July 1st 2011. Not 2012. Today is Day One. This morning started with an ILM meeting for five hours in San Francisco. Currently I'm flying with writer Ehren Kruger to Rhode Island to talk to Hasbro about new characters." Bay also jokingly addressed the public rift between himself and his leading lady. "P.S. Megan Fox, welcome back. I promise no alien robots will harm you in any way during the production of this motion picture," the director blogged, adding a litany of physical side effects that can result from collaborating with him and urging her to contact her physician. He added that "Pain and Gain is right after shooting of Trans 3." That would mean Bad Boys III is at least five years away, if it's still even in the works (at least with Bay involved). Ditto I Am Number Four. Bay had been on the fence about returning for Transformers 3 in recent months (especially after Paramount announced the July 1, 2011 release date without checking his availability first), emphasizing his need for a break from the franchise after shooting two giant movies back-to-back. No rest for the weary, Mr. Bay. |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Paramount studio rep: Michael, we want TF3 in 2011.
Bay: No way, I need time off. (large sack of money is plopped on table) Bay smiles and signs on dotted line. |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
I hope they have some stereotypically offensive chinese robots this time! maybe cars that keep crashing? thin, skinny headlights?
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Currently I'm flying with writer Ehren Kruger to Rhode Island to talk to Hasbro about new characters. |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Well I am sad to see them make this before Bad Boys III but I hope Thansformers 3 is more like Trans. 2 than the first one.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
sweet!
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by William Fuld
(Post 9745316)
That sentence alone encapsulates everything that is wrong with the movie industry.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by chris_sc77
(Post 9745318)
I hope Thansformers 3 is more like Trans. 2 than the first one.
And don't give me your runtime BS because both movies are beyond two hours long with only 7 minutes difference between them. Also, neither is rated R. |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
The second movie is a pile of shit. The third movie is being rushed, so it will probably be a pile of shit as well. The first one is a fucking masterpiece when compared to the second.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by DthRdrX
(Post 9745448)
The second movie is a pile of shit. The third movie is being rushed, so it will probably be a pile of shit as well. The first one is a fucking masterpiece when compared to the second.
Pre-production on the second one started around the same time in 2007 (late September / early October) with filming starting in May 2008 for a release date more than barely a year later. I'd say the second film was more rushed due to the Writer's Strike that happened during most of the film's pre-production schedule. P.S. Both films suck. P.P.S. I hope I'm not tricked into seeing this one. I saw both theatrically as I'm a Bay apologist and the only reason I was at the sequel was due to seeing the scenes shot specifically for IMAX. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.