View Poll Results: How was Quantum of Solace (if you've seen it)?
Voters: 191. You may not vote on this poll
One and Only Quantum of Solace (James Bond) review thread!
#177
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
I hadn't seen this mentioned anywhere:
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/feat...eap.4643021.jp
Not so, says Forster. Aside from a 45-second sequence involving Craig, everything that was scripted ended up in the movie. "I just wanted this to be a much shorter film. Casino Royale was way too long for my taste; that poker game was really slow, so I wanted to make this a really tight and fast film. It should be like a bullet."
#179
Senior Member
even the booze i snuck into the theater couldn't make this movie enjoyable. for all the brosnan haters, die another day was better than this pos. besides having not an ounce of charisma, charm, or incapable of being suave, craig feels more like a hitman than a MI:6 operative. the plot, a whole movie dedicated to finding out vesper's killer. yawn. craig killing everyone is so not believable. I thought the reboot of this franchise was supposed to bring more realism to the bond franchise. seriously, bond being able to out-manuever a fighter plane with a cargo plane. taking on an army by himself? bond is about sneaking his way to the main villain not about being rambo. the ending was ridiculous, mr. green walks into the desert to flee when he was capable to jump into a vehicle ala bond and get away. for someone to say this was the best bond film since license to kill. no. goldeneye got it right and imo is the best bond film to date or top three. I'm still in disbelief that bond actually took out a fighter pilot. laughable. I agree what most critics had to say about this movie being a ripoff of a bourne movie. the apartment fight was almost an exact replica of one of the bourne fight sequences.
Last edited by Son of Odin; 11-17-08 at 10:37 PM.
#180
DVD Talk Legend
#181
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,461
Received 1,911 Likes
on
1,173 Posts
#182
DVD Talk Limited Edition
I agree with him actually; I thought the poker game was ridiculous in its final execution. There was no skill involved in the final hand, just the luckiest draw of cards anyone has ever seen for 4 players. In fact, there was no skill involved in nearly all of the poker game, yet they set up Bond as the best poker player in MI:6, able to read players and bluff his way through any situation, and then never used any of that setup. That and the stalled plot at the end of the movie were the weakest parts of Casino Royale. But as a reboot, it was effective otherwise.
#183
I agree with him actually; I thought the poker game was ridiculous in its final execution. There was no skill involved in the final hand, just the luckiest draw of cards anyone has ever seen for 4 players. In fact, there was no skill involved in nearly all of the poker game, yet they set up Bond as the best poker player in MI:6, able to read players and bluff his way through any situation, and then never used any of that setup. That and the stalled plot at the end of the movie were the weakest parts of Casino Royale. But as a reboot, it was effective otherwise.
#185
Banned by request
Just wanted to bring up what I posted in the original thread. A 5 FILM STORY ARC. This was a great CONTINUATION of Casino Royale. There was enough character moments in QoS to show Bond's growth as a 00. And this is a great beginning to the exploration of Quantum. In previous films, we got a polished Bond. Craig's Bond is still rough around the edges. The events of Casino Royale left him vulnerable. QoS, he's out to prove a point that he isn't (anymore), but in meeting with Camille, he sees what can happen when you act and not think therefore placing yourself in more jeopardy. There's a fine line they're taking with the development of Bond to turn him into the character we've known.
Does that mean I hated it? No. For the most part, I enjoyed it. But after Casino Royale, which dealt with both the epic (worldwide terrorism) and the personal (Vesper), it feels like things have been scaled back for Quantum of Solace. And that can't help but feel disappointing. On the other hand, there are a lot of things to like in the movie. But when you take the threadbare plot, and combine it with the spotty action (I liked the escape from the bar in South America, the plane sequence, and the final fight, but the action between the opening and the Opera was awful), you get a less than satisfying all around Bond film. Especially coming off of Casino Royale. And saying it's part of a larger story doesn't excuse it from being not as good as the last movie. The problem, in my mind, is with Forster. A better action director could have turned this into an above average Bond movie into a great Bond movie.
#186
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
#187
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#189
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Posts: 34,260
Received 769 Likes
on
556 Posts
If that's true, than this film didn't do what it should have done. The second act of a five act story is rising action. This felt like falling action. What did we really get from this movie? The name Quantum. That's it. We already knew there was an organization. We already knew MI6 knew nothing about them. At the end, Bond alludes to getting a bunch of info from Greene. Do we hear any of that info? No. Quantum of Solace is a footnote to Casino Royale. It almost feels like an ancillary product that the studio cooks up to bridge the events of the first film to the events of the second. Honestly, couldn't you see this being a novel or a video game that takes place between Casino Royale and the unnamed third Craig film? I can.
Does that mean I hated it? No. For the most part, I enjoyed it. But after Casino Royale, which dealt with both the epic (worldwide terrorism) and the personal (Vesper), it feels like things have been scaled back for Quantum of Solace. And that can't help but feel disappointing. On the other hand, there are a lot of things to like in the movie. But when you take the threadbare plot, and combine it with the spotty action (I liked the escape from the bar in South America, the plane sequence, and the final fight, but the action between the opening and the Opera was awful), you get a less than satisfying all around Bond film. Especially coming off of Casino Royale. And saying it's part of a larger story doesn't excuse it from being not as good as the last movie. The problem, in my mind, is with Forster. A better action director could have turned this into an above average Bond movie into a great Bond movie.
Does that mean I hated it? No. For the most part, I enjoyed it. But after Casino Royale, which dealt with both the epic (worldwide terrorism) and the personal (Vesper), it feels like things have been scaled back for Quantum of Solace. And that can't help but feel disappointing. On the other hand, there are a lot of things to like in the movie. But when you take the threadbare plot, and combine it with the spotty action (I liked the escape from the bar in South America, the plane sequence, and the final fight, but the action between the opening and the Opera was awful), you get a less than satisfying all around Bond film. Especially coming off of Casino Royale. And saying it's part of a larger story doesn't excuse it from being not as good as the last movie. The problem, in my mind, is with Forster. A better action director could have turned this into an above average Bond movie into a great Bond movie.
#190
Member
I think this is another case of people loving a film so much that the sequel will inevitably be trashed by many, the exception being a film like The Dark Knight. As much as I liked Casino Royale, I think it was a bit overrated. Yeah, it's the best Bond film in years, but how great can a Bond film ever really get? Maybe I shouldn't look at it from that perspective, but I think Casino Royale, while it redefined Bond, wasn't exactly earth-shattering excitement. They're fun movies, but come on.
#191
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Two observation on M's role in this one I just thought of. While some are calling her "changed" M role as CSI-esque consider the following.
1) The initial meeting with Mr. White was a high value target that was presumedly linked to whoever just stole all of the money from the poker game (and possibly something larger). I can see how homeoffice was on her to find the money, which might compell her to investiagte the matter first hand.
2) The rest of the meetings I can also see why she'd need to go in person. Not only had she been betrayed by a mole in her organizaton, but she was getting pressure from the foreign office. "Don't worry, my people assure me..."; I think not. Not to mention it appears that Bond may too have gone rogue. I don't think she's at the point where she can trust anybody else to look into such a matter. This is all summed up by their conversation on trust after he takes out the elevator crowd.
1) The initial meeting with Mr. White was a high value target that was presumedly linked to whoever just stole all of the money from the poker game (and possibly something larger). I can see how homeoffice was on her to find the money, which might compell her to investiagte the matter first hand.
2) The rest of the meetings I can also see why she'd need to go in person. Not only had she been betrayed by a mole in her organizaton, but she was getting pressure from the foreign office. "Don't worry, my people assure me..."; I think not. Not to mention it appears that Bond may too have gone rogue. I don't think she's at the point where she can trust anybody else to look into such a matter. This is all summed up by their conversation on trust after he takes out the elevator crowd.
#192
Moderator
I definitely plan on checking QoS out a second time -- not sure if I'll like it more or less (had a mediocre reaction after the first viewing).
#196
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This movie nearly defines mediocrity. The action scenes were shot and edited TERRIBLY! You couldn't tell what the hell was happening! The story was Meh and the movie as a whole was Meh. Daniel Craig is a good Bond, much better than Pierce "I suck at acting" Brosnan. 2 stars out of 4.
#197
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And the side Ukranian Bolivian chick actress was more developed in Xavier Gen's HITMAN (much more entertaining than QUANTUM).
#198
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Posts: 34,260
Received 769 Likes
on
556 Posts
This is what I took away from the film, sorry if it seems that people needed cut and dry, hit you over the head clues that say "LOOK, THIS IS A CHARACTER MOMENT SO PAY ATTENTION!"
#199
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,461
Received 1,911 Likes
on
1,173 Posts
Great post Devilshalo.
Yeah I think you're right about Quantum/Green all being a side issue or the "MacGuffin" for the movie with Bond's growth as a human/Agent and him realizing what others had been saying about Vespa loving him being the real story.
I guess I can see where Old School Bond fans might not like this. I think down the line people will look back with an appreciation of Craig's Bond.
Yeah I think you're right about Quantum/Green all being a side issue or the "MacGuffin" for the movie with Bond's growth as a human/Agent and him realizing what others had been saying about Vespa loving him being the real story.
I guess I can see where Old School Bond fans might not like this. I think down the line people will look back with an appreciation of Craig's Bond.
#200
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
even the booze i snuck into the theater couldn't make this movie enjoyable. for all the brosnan haters, die another day was better than this pos. besides having not an ounce of charisma, charm, or incapable of being suave, craig feels more like a hitman than a MI:6 operative. the plot, a whole movie dedicated to finding out vesper's killer. yawn. craig killing everyone is so not believable. I thought the reboot of this franchise was supposed to bring more realism to the bond franchise. seriously, bond being able to out-manuever a fighter plane with a cargo plane. taking on an army by himself? bond is about sneaking his way to the main villain not about being rambo. the ending was ridiculous, mr. green walks into the desert to flee when he was capable to jump into a vehicle ala bond and get away. for someone to say this was the best bond film since license to kill. no. goldeneye got it right and imo is the best bond film to date or top three. I'm still in disbelief that bond actually took out a fighter pilot. laughable. I agree what most critics had to say about this movie being a ripoff of a bourne movie. the apartment fight was almost an exact replica of one of the bourne fight sequences.
And I think that is being done since it's the beginning of Bond. By the next movie I hope to see some more charm in his charcater. Maybe grow his hair a little longer and tone down the pics.