DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   Movie Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk-17/)
-   -   Really pretentious directors? (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk/539639-really-pretentious-directors.html)

Palaver 09-15-08 08:38 AM


Originally Posted by SeekOnce (Post 8938132)
M Night

This is the correct answer.

Giles 09-15-08 09:02 AM

as much as I am a fan, it's kind of odd that I would slam Peter Greenaway, he introduced and did a Q&A after a screening of 'The Tulse Luper Suitcases, Part 1: The Moab Story' and 'Antwerp' - listening to him speak or should I say gush over his films and such, it got grating real fast. Being the masochist I am, I'm curious to see how over the top he gets on his 'Zed and Two Noughts' DVD commentary track, or if I want to self inflict myself with a nail gun to the forehead instead.

The Bus 09-15-08 10:09 AM


Originally Posted by AudioWizard (Post 8939098)

:up: :lol:

Jason Bovberg 09-15-08 10:33 AM

Peter Bogdonavich. He only directs "pictures," you know.

Maybe also Spike Lee with his "joints."

slop101 09-15-08 10:55 AM

I was just gonna say Greenway - he's certainly a talented director, but he's so full of his own shit, that he's insufferable, as are his movies sometimes.

chris_sc77 09-15-08 11:02 AM

Wong Kar Wai. I really like Chungking Express and My Blueberry Nights but In The Mood For Love is one of the most pretentious pieces of cinema/art/shit I have ever seen.

Similarly I am a big fan of Michael Hanake. I love both versions of Funny Games and I think Benny's Video is a very good film but Cache (Hidden) I find to be one of the most boring/pretentious/uninvolving wastes of time I can imagine a film to be.

Drop 09-15-08 11:35 AM


Originally Posted by lamphorn (Post 8939298)
I would call Vincent Gallo pretentious because he pulls shock stunts in the name of "art" and they don't mean shit except he gets to have a hot chick suck his cock onscreen.

I agree he is pretentious, but have you seen The Brown Bunny? That scene actually made sense in the context of the film, and because it's real actually enhances the scene. I wouldn't call it gratuitous. It's also interesting that in his two films he plays fairly unlikeable characters, they are not flattering in the least. And when you consider the amount of negative feed back he gets, some of it truly hateful, it's hard to see the glamour in that.

Giles 09-15-08 11:47 AM


Originally Posted by chris_sc77 (Post 8939881)
Wong Kar Wai. I really like Chungking Express and My Blueberry Nights but In The Mood For Love is one of the most pretentious pieces of cinema/art/shit I have ever seen.


or as I like to retitle that movie, 'In the Mood for a Nap'

Hokeyboy 09-15-08 01:44 PM

I'd like to hear many of the posters in this thread to define the word "pretentious"...

chris_sc77 09-15-08 02:25 PM


Originally Posted by Matt Millheiser (Post 8940315)
I'd like to hear many of the posters in this thread to define the word "pretentious"...

I dont know I guess like everything else regarding ones tastes in film it is subjective and based on personal taste/patience/likes/dislikes, etc.
I think a pretentious film is one that has no regard for an audience by not having the correct or right amount of involving elements.

Rockmjd23 09-15-08 02:29 PM


Originally Posted by Matt Millheiser (Post 8940315)
I'd like to hear many of the posters in this thread to define the word "pretentious"...

You first, webster.

toddly6666 09-15-08 02:34 PM

:confused: Mathew Barney :up:
:bow: Darren Arronofsky :up:
:bow: Tarsem Singh :up:
:clap: Pan Nalin :up:
-popcorn- Alexandro Jodorowsky :up:
:wtf: Dusan Makavejev :up:

:johnwoo2: Wong Kar Wai :bmonkey: :gah:
:boring:Rainer Werner Fassbinder :down:
Whit Stillman :thmbsdwn:
Christopher Guest :thmbsdwn:

Hokeyboy 09-15-08 02:55 PM


Originally Posted by Rockmjd23 (Post 8940449)
You first, webster.

Ruthlessly self-indulgent to the point of absolute obfuscation... douchebag.

Ergo, anyone who thinks Michael Bay is "pretentious" either has no idea what the word means, or has the intellectual capacity of a sump pump.

hardercore 09-15-08 02:57 PM

Gus Van Sant

toddly6666 09-15-08 02:57 PM

Calling Michael Bay a pretentious director is the equivalent of knighting George W. Bush.

Giles 09-15-08 03:06 PM


Originally Posted by toddly6666 (Post 8940523)
Calling Michael Bay a pretentious director is the equivalent of knighting George W. Bush.

:lol:

starseed1981 09-15-08 03:22 PM

Another vote for M. Night.

Daytripper 09-15-08 04:10 PM


Originally Posted by hardercore (Post 8940522)
Gus Van Sant

SOOOO agree!

NoirFan 09-15-08 04:55 PM

Guy Maddin. I enjoy many of his films and believe is one of the few true visionaries currently working in film, but dear God was Twilight of the Ice Nymphs insufferable! It played more like a parody of the typical pretentious art film than anything else, and the lead looked and acted as if he had mistakenly wandered off of the General Hospital set.

lamphorn 09-15-08 07:58 PM


Originally Posted by wendersfan (Post 8939523)
Surely you realize that those two being "genuinely brilliant filmmakers" is your opinion, not a statement of fact?

Since the Original Poster solicited "opinions", I would take everything written in this thread as opinion.

That was my opinion, as the OP requested. Care to share yours?

JumpCutz 09-15-08 08:43 PM

David Lynch

zooiiks 09-15-08 10:14 PM


Originally Posted by troystiffler (Post 8938753)
Wow. That's definately arrogant and pretentious. Did he include himself in that statement? How many times has he kicked the coke habit, been arrested for DUI and been in jail? I guess Stone is a slave to teh booze and substance abuse. Was this back in the mid 90's, when he was still making memorable (not just 'good') movies?

You mean group himself with us lowly film goers? Hell no. He wouldn't even make eye contact with us. This was back in '95 or '96. He also basically told a girl she was an idiot for not liking Natural Born Killers.

Troy Stiffler 09-15-08 11:18 PM


Originally Posted by Matt Millheiser (Post 8940518)
Ruthlessly self-indulgent to the point of absolute obfuscation... douchebag.

Without the pretty vocab, I consider pretentious ... caught 'pretending' to grasp and understand and, in a directors case, purvey to others ... when they really don't have the capacity to do so. This is frequently caused by aiming far higher than their capacity ... which is nobel ... which is why I don't have a problem with 'pretentious' directors and their snobby upshot films. I guess it's like being an 'unqualified elitist'.

With that, I stand by my Godard comment. If anyone wants to see the interviews, check YouTube. I just want to punch him in the face - and then praise him for making really good movies.

I also stand by my comment that it takes a level of ego and confidence (whether or not deserved) to get a movie made.

Kevin Smith is with Michael Bay as absolutely NOT being pretentious. Actually, I can't really think of many other directors who are less pretentious. They both throw out there universally enjoyable, simple movies that are made FOR a large audience.

NoirFan 09-15-08 11:20 PM


Originally Posted by Giles (Post 8939661)
as much as I am a fan, it's kind of odd that I would slam Peter Greenaway, he introduced and did a Q&A after a screening of 'The Tulse Luper Suitcases, Part 1: The Moab Story' and 'Antwerp' - listening to him speak or should I say gush over his films and such, it got grating real fast. Being the masochist I am, I'm curious to see how over the top he gets on his 'Zed and Two Noughts' DVD commentary track, or if I want to self inflict myself with a nail gun to the forehead instead.

My friend studied under him this summer and said he was really cool and down to earth, and would even hang out with his students after classes and drink a couple of beers.

dx23 09-15-08 11:26 PM

Damien Cockburn


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.