DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   Movie Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk-17/)
-   -   The Strangers (2008) (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk/527144-strangers-2008-a.html)

Robert 06-01-08 12:12 AM

Spoiler:
The most ridiculous aspect of this uninspired horror movie is, the fact that Tyler's character gets fully dressed but conveniently forgets to put on shoes so when she has to walk through the woods, she gets hurt and then has to crawl agonizingly slow to keep us on the edge of our seats.

Brack 06-01-08 12:43 AM

hey, Scott Speedman always gives a solid performance. he was good on "Felicity," back in the day.

Mikael79 06-01-08 12:46 AM


Originally Posted by Gunde
This movie has plenty of cheap jump scares

Some were cheap, while others were not.

Spoiler:
The opening of the curtains and seeing the masked male wasn't what I'd call cheap, and neither was the part where Liv's character was drinking water and he's suddenly standing in the house.

MartinBlank 06-01-08 01:26 AM

I liked the movie a lot. Thought it built tension really good, both with pace and music. I'm sick and tired of these cookie-cutter "this is why the crazy guy's crazy" storylines and the Eli Roth torture-horror-porn shit being produced nowadays...gore doesn't necessarily equate to "scary", and this movie proves that.


Originally Posted by Rainet
Spoiler:

Two. At the very end when the two kids walked into the house. Ok, i can somewhat believe them to walk through the open door even though it's trespassing, but even before they saw the couple, after you see the blood on the wall and the shotgun, wouldnt you run the hell out of the house.

Spoiler:
I guess somebody's never seen Stand By Me ;)



Originally Posted by LivingINClip
Spoiler:
I loved the fact we never really see the stranger's faces. Instead, they have the mask or the camera avoids them. Also loved the fact that at the end, there as no huge escape. It was extremely personal. They took their masks off so that their victims could see their faces and then they brutally stabbed them.

Spoiler:
That was my favorite part, the fact that there were just CRAZY. No explanation...no picked on as a child (Zombie's Michael Myers), no fucked up childhood (Hannibal Rising), no genetic defects (Bay's Texas Chainsaw Massacre). They were just crazy fucked up people doing crazy fucked up things.



Originally Posted by Robert
Spoiler:
The most ridiculous aspect of this uninspired horror movie is, the fact that Tyler's character gets fully dressed but conveniently forgets to put on shoes so when she has to walk through the woods, she gets hurt and then has to crawl agonizingly slow to keep us on the edge of our seats.

Spoiler:
Kinda like Die Hard. :D

ardathbey 06-01-08 03:16 AM


Originally Posted by Brack
hey, Scott Speedman always gives a solid performance. he was good on "Felicity," back in the day.

That may be well and good but his "credibility" is not the reason the movie is doing well as the person I quoted said was likely the case.

danegger 06-01-08 06:59 AM

Being that I am a reclusive nut who absolutely hates to do anything that will involve a large crowd, I wanted to see this movie and my wife convinced me and dragged me off to it last night. I was not dissapointed. It was great. We got there and the theatre was jam packed so we had to sit on the front row, which absolutely sucked!!! But other than that, I thought the movie was well done. The crowd really dug into it with some screams and shrieks. Some of it was predictable, but it didn't take away from the effect.

Now I'm just waiting for The Dark Knight!!!

LivingINClip 06-01-08 08:32 AM


Originally Posted by MartinBlank


Spoiler:
That was my favorite part, the fact that there were just CRAZY. No explanation...no picked on as a child (Zombie's Michael Myers), no fucked up childhood (Hannibal Rising), no genetic defects (Bay's Texas Chainsaw Massacre). They were just crazy fucked up people doing crazy fucked up things.



[/spoiler]

Spoiler:
"Are you a sinner?"
"Sometimes."

"It'll be easier the next time.."



Lines like that made the movie for me. Just a true creepy factor .

xfilefanfreak 06-01-08 09:03 AM

realy loved it was well done will pick it up on dvd !

kurupt 06-01-08 09:52 AM


Originally Posted by Brack
hey, Scott Speedman always gives a solid performance. he was good on "Felicity," back in the day.

If "solid performance" means unable to effectively emote anything other than a singular blank emotion and a monotone lisp, his career has certainly been solid. That said, The Strangers, while predictable and cliched, was very tense. There were "jump scares" aplenty that were very effective and not what I would call "cheap scares" (I reserve that for cats jumping out in lieu of the killer and trash cans falling over and causing a startling noise). I came out of the theater pleasantly surprised.

riley_dude 06-01-08 01:55 PM


Originally Posted by kurupt
If "solid performance" means unable to effectively emote anything other than a singular blank emotion and a monotone lisp, his career has certainly been solid. That said, The Strangers, while predictable and cliched, was very tense. There were "jump scares" aplenty that were very effective and not what I would call "cheap scares" (I reserve that for cats jumping out in lieu of the killer and trash cans falling over and causing a startling noise). I came out of the theater pleasantly surprised.

I agree. Watching Felicity and his other films over the years I am surprised that Speedman gets more work than his costar of Felicity, Scott Foley, who was always much better.

This current movie is getting horrible reviews. I think I will wait until DVD.

Rainet 06-01-08 02:00 PM


Originally Posted by riley_dude
I agree. Watching Felicity and his other films over the years I am surprised that Speedman gets more work than his costar of Felicity, Scott Foley, who was always much better.

This current movie is getting horrible reviews. I think I will wait until DVD.

Was there ever a slasher film that got great reviews? :question:

onebyone 06-01-08 02:49 PM

The movie had me on the edge of my seat. I was able to overlook many flaws like Speedman's blank acting because it was so tense. The scene were
Spoiler:
Lix's character was alone in the house waiting for him to come back with cigarettes
was one of the scariest that I had seen in quite some time. I was pretty much scared stiff. Good times.

My only fault with it was that it didn't end a few minutes earlier. I think that
Spoiler:
having them drive away after getting the pamphlet would have been a perfect ending. The ending as it is, well, seems really cheap and predictable.
I wish it hadn't ended on a bad note, but there were so many good notes before that I am willing to let it slide and call the movie a big success.

SuckaMC 06-01-08 03:26 PM

Speedman was a puss.

Spoiler:
Once you have a shotgun, you should be hunting the three unarmed (no guns) attackers.

Dr Mabuse 06-01-08 04:02 PM

this movie was the suckiest pile of suck that ever sucked...

and what REALLY sucks, is it could have been something really cool if it were in the hands of someone with real talent and creativity...

maximus49 06-01-08 04:11 PM

I'm curious about something that no one has mentioned yet...
Spoiler:
Who was the person calling 911 on the phone at the begining of the film? From their voice, it sounded like it was a girl. My friend told me it was probably one of the kids that found the bodies. The caller identified themselves as Jordan. It didnt sound like a kid though, and I think it was most likely one of the killers.

DRG 06-01-08 06:31 PM

I'm torn on this one. I think it does a great job of establishing character and mood early in the film. But once
Spoiler:
the buddy shows up it just felt like a series of stupid character decisions. I'm sorry but if I have a gun and people are terrorizing me on my property, I'd have gone outside to that big open area and if the bad guys wanted to try something, bam. And the whole thing with the guy leaving Liv Tyler while he went for help with the only gun, after they already know the bad guys could get in the house.

And the climax just felt out-of-place to me, as if the filmmakers ran out of cerebral scares and had no tricks left except abrupt brutality. Personally I think it would have been more interesting if they *hadn't* killed them (or in Liv's case, tried to kill them) because having the trio disappear having *only* terrorized them and leaving them to live with the nightmare (which includes the guy living with -- and having to explain --shooting his best friend in the face) is more creepy in my opinion.

Dr Mabuse 06-01-08 08:00 PM

you touched on a few of the things that were so mindlessly inane that it blew the whole film...

what pisses me off really, is if the writer/director had possessed a >100 IQ this could have been a good horror movie...

the setup of the suspense was very well done... it wasn't going to win any oscars but i was with, and enjoying, the film, and the whole thing was developing well... the 'surprise' scare scenes worked, the masks and the whole 'thing' of 'The Strangers' worked... then suddenly it becomes like almost a self-parody... like a sarcastic self-parody exposition scene in 'Scream' or something... like a skit...

and it just kept getting more and more stupid till i heard people laughing in the theatre at two 'plot development' points...

then it comes back to a pretty damn effective final scene... and could have ended well... but they blew that too, by having the out of place ending mentioned above... almost like "see we thought this up at the last second so we can justify a sequel" or something...

suckfest...

MartinBlank 06-01-08 09:30 PM


Originally Posted by onebyone
My only fault with it was that it didn't end a few minutes earlier. I think that
Spoiler:
having them drive away after getting the pamphlet would have been a perfect ending. The ending as it is, well, seems really cheap and predictable.

Spoiler:
It had to end that way...who else was to tell the story that was based on actual events ;)


One thing I found weird...

Spoiler:
In the beginning of the film when we first meet the couple sitting at the stoplight, I could have sworn that the guy had bloody knuckles, leading me to believe that the story was going to be told in a flashback style. I also thought they were made prominent during the "lust" scene. Did anybody else notice this?

I figured there must have been an altercation at the event earlier in the night which was cut from the film in order to made the character still appear weak/non-heroic.

kurupt 06-02-08 05:29 AM


Originally Posted by MartinBlank
One thing I found weird...

Spoiler:
In the beginning of the film when we first meet the couple sitting at the stoplight, I could have sworn that the guy had bloody knuckles, leading me to believe that the story was going to be told in a flashback style. I also thought they were made prominent during the "lust" scene. Did anybody else notice this?

I figured there must have been an altercation at the event earlier in the night which was cut from the film in order to made the character still appear weak/non-heroic.

Spoiler:
I took that as red knuckles from gripping the steering wheel so hard due to being pissed off because of the rejection, but I could be wrong

kaze0 06-02-08 06:23 AM

I feel like theres been a lot of scary movies lately where
Spoiler:
the good guys die

LivingINClip 06-02-08 08:32 AM

My only complaint was.

Spoiler:
The friend pulls up. Someone busts his windshield - so he gets out and explores? He had a cellphone, he should of just drove off and called 911.


Other than that, I loved the film.

MoviePage 06-02-08 02:16 PM

I'm with the majority here. Very suspenseful, well-made film until the friend shows up, then it turns into a laundry list of every cliched moment from every other horror movie ever made, with characters making the most boneheaded and plot-convenient decisions possible, almost to the point of self-parody.

I'm extremely disappointed.

SPiRAL 06-02-08 06:08 PM


Originally Posted by maximus49
I'm curious about something that no one has mentioned yet...
Spoiler:
Who was the person calling 911 on the phone at the begining of the film? From their voice, it sounded like it was a girl. My friend told me it was probably one of the kids that found the bodies. The caller identified themselves as Jordan. It didnt sound like a kid though, and I think it was most likely one of the killers.


Your friend was right.

Mikael79 06-02-08 11:16 PM

The one negative that I keep telling friends is the part where
Spoiler:
The guy tells his girlfriend that he's going to go find help, and that she should stay there. So not only is he leaving her in a house that the strangers have proven they can enter, but he was also bringing the rifle with him.

Was this his revenge for her saying "no" to his marriage request?

kaze0 06-03-08 08:30 AM

The dvd talk review is really harsh. Wow.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.