DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   Movie Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk-17/)
-   -   Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk/515481-useless-remake-477-taking-pelham-one-two-three.html)

Zen Peckinpah 10-26-07 06:59 AM

Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=38799

Okay, this is a movie I wouldn't mind a remake of with something going in the right direction. Getting Tony Scott is, IMO, a step in that direction, because whether you hated Domino and Man on Fire (I loved both personally), he is tailor-made for the action genre. The Last Boy Scout? True frickin' Romance?

But this has "shit" written all over it. For one, Denzel Washington's casting is some of the biggest typecasting I've heard in a while. For one, he virtually played the same exact role in Inside Man, and both of that and the original Pelham have the haggard cop trying to talk down a hostage crisis, and he also toplined The Manchurian Candidate remake. I loved him in Inside Man, but honestly, they should just make this Inside Man 2 from the sound of it. However, if Tony Scott can make him half as badass as he was in Man on Fire...

Also, look at the recent casting of John Travolta in the scenery-devouring Robert Shaw role from the original. Maybe it's because South Park etched an irremovable image of him trying to coax Tom Cruise out of the closet, but the man is 250 pounds of Canadian bacon when it comes to playing villain roles. The greatness of Face/Off covered it, but remember the ham-fisted turn he has in The Punisher? I rest my case. If he plays it more like Vincent Vega, then we might be in good hands, but after his anti-intensity output this year, I can't see the man taking a subway hostage.

Maybe this can work out, but right now, I'm not convinced.

Charlie Goose 10-26-07 09:04 AM

I have a feeling this will be a lot different than the original, they're probably only using the title and very basic plot.

There was a middling TV remake some years ago with Vincent D'Onofrio in the Shaw role and Edward James Olsmos and Lorraine Bracco sharing the Walter Matthau role.

Rad14 10-26-07 09:14 AM

Tell me, why does it need remade?

FinkPish 10-26-07 11:17 AM

So they can do a remix of the kickass main theme: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXrEptVgUnc

Thrush 10-27-07 12:21 AM

I need an MP3 of that theme.

FinkPish 11-01-07 07:29 PM


Originally Posted by Thrush
I need an MP3 of that theme.

PM me if you still want this. And anyone else.

Geofferson 11-02-07 10:49 AM

I absolutely adore the original...tightly-wound thriller laced with humor throughout.

Unnecessary remake though.

Groucho 11-02-07 10:51 AM

Didn't they recently remake this for television?

Tracer Bullet 11-02-07 11:51 AM


Originally Posted by Geofferson
I absolutely adore the original...tightly-would thriller laced with humor throughout.

Unnecessary remake though.

I absolutely agree, although I think a good remake could say something interesting about post 9/11 New York. I tend to think this will not be that remake.

Charlie Goose 11-02-07 12:08 PM


Originally Posted by Groucho
Didn't they recently remake this for television?

Check the first response.

Groucho 11-02-07 12:22 PM


Originally Posted by Charlie Goose
Check the first response.

I have that poster on ignore.

Artman 11-02-07 12:28 PM

They've got my money, lookin forward to it.

gfoots 11-02-07 02:51 PM


Originally Posted by Thrush
I need an MP3 of that theme.

I need mp3s of the entire score.

FinkPish 11-02-07 03:46 PM


Originally Posted by gfoots
I need mp3s of the entire score.

Email me directly, everyone who wants it.

johnnysd 11-03-07 02:31 AM

The original was my first R rated movie that I was taken to by my parents. Have not seen it since 74. I should get a copy.

gfoots 11-03-07 02:58 AM


Originally Posted by FinkPish
Email me directly, everyone who wants it.

PM sent. I've got David Shire's Conversation score if anyone wants that.

Charlie Goose 11-05-07 07:33 AM


Originally Posted by Groucho
I have that poster on ignore.

:sad: :(

Mok 02-13-09 05:53 AM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
The trailer is up, eh I don't like it.

http://www.catchthetrain.com/

riotinmyskull 02-13-09 06:17 AM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
we better get an SE of the original on dvd for having to deal with this shit.

Mok 02-13-09 06:29 AM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
I know I watching my non-anamorphic copy last week.

Geofferson 02-13-09 08:46 AM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
Wow -- lame trailer. Not even looking forward to seeing this movie.

Read an interview that while filming, Denzel had never even seen the original. :down:

BullGooseLoony 02-13-09 08:53 AM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
I have always wanted to see a remake of this movie, so I'm excited. The original was a very deliberate thriller, and it worked, but I always thought more action could work, too.

I'll agree that Washington's role looks very similar to his role in Inside Man, and Travolta might ham it up as the villain, but at the end of the day, it's Denzel Washington AND John Travolta. That's the kind of star-powered pairing we haven't seen in a while.

I like the trailer. I think it sets up the story nice, shows that it isn't all action, but shows that the movie will get tense. I really hope it's good, this might be my second-most anticipated movie after Transformers 2.

Solid Snake 02-13-09 09:11 AM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
Where's this trailer? link or actual posting of trailer please

EDIT: nevermind here it is.

<object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/k_fbAz4--qw&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/k_fbAz4--qw&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object>

Haven't seen the original...this looks like entertaining at the least. Dunno if it's actually any good..but I'll want to see it until I hear a large amount of negative feedback of it.

riotinmyskull 02-13-09 09:28 AM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 

Originally Posted by BullGooseLoony (Post 9264043)
I have always wanted to see a remake of this movie, so I'm excited. The original was a very deliberate thriller, and it worked, but I always thought more action could work, too.

I'll agree that Washington's role looks very similar to his role in Inside Man, and Travolta might ham it up as the villain, but at the end of the day, it's Denzel Washington AND John Travolta. That's the kind of star-powered pairing we haven't seen in a while.

I like the trailer. I think it sets up the story nice, shows that it isn't all action, but shows that the movie will get tense. I really hope it's good, this might be my second-most anticipated movie after Transformers 2.


what drugs are you on?

Zen Peckinpah 02-13-09 10:02 AM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
Can't make an exact decision on this one, but it ain't the '74 one. Looks like one of the many "Die Hard on a..." movies studios were pumping out in the late 80's through the mid-90's. It could be good as a fan of Tony Scott, but I'm not feeling this one.

Matthew Ackerly 02-13-09 10:33 AM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 

Originally Posted by BullGooseLoony (Post 9264043)
I really hope it's good, this might be my second-most anticipated movie after Transformers 2.

Public Enemies, Inglorius Basterds, Terminator 4, Wolverine, Avatar, Shutter Island.


This and Transformers 2 are your most anticpated? Really?

Solid Snake 02-13-09 10:58 AM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
Let's not forget Watchmen and Where The Wild Things Are...

ah...it's up at Trailer Addict now..much better looking..

<object width="450" height="264"><param name="movie" value="http://www.traileraddict.com/emd/8813"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.traileraddict.com/emd/8813" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" wmode="transparent" width="450" height="264" allowFullScreen="true"></embed></object>

Artman 02-13-09 11:16 AM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
Looks good to me! You like the old one watch the old one.

TheNightFlier 02-13-09 11:27 AM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
It doesn't look bad at all. I'll see it.

ChefWinduAZ 02-13-09 11:32 AM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
This looks pretty good but I want to watch the original first before I see the remake.

Mok 02-13-09 12:25 PM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
I hate the part where Garber's wife is yelling at him to get the milk.

Zen Peckinpah 02-13-09 12:27 PM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 

Originally Posted by Mok (Post 9264531)
I hate the part where Garber's wife is yelling at him to get the milk.

Yeah, that REALLY grated on me too.

Mok 02-13-09 12:29 PM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
They could have at least had Jerry Stiller reprise his role, or maybe make a cameo.

iamiam 02-13-09 12:47 PM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
Not so useless, wouldn't this expose some new viewers to the original?

Ronnie Dobbs 02-13-09 12:57 PM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
the original is on hulu for free. its pretty good but Travolta is no Robert Shaw. I'll prob rent the remake.

http://www.hulu.com/watch/27822/the-...-one-two-three

chris_sc77 02-13-09 03:13 PM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
The original was very good but i think this one looks decent as well. At least they didnt make it PG-13. I hope Tony Scott doesn't ruin this with the terrible editing that ruined Man on Fire.
And , yeah, I too thought the milk line was very out of place in the trailer.

Torchur317 02-13-09 03:16 PM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
Useless Remake? No way....
I loved the original film but with this cast & crew it could easily be better....

DJariya 02-13-09 06:17 PM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
It looks good, but the person who cut the trailer should be shot for adding the line about getting the milk.

Washington and Travolta's action movies have normally been pretty good. The stinker from Denzel that I can think of from the last 5 years or so would be Out of Time. For Travolta it would be Basic.

You can't go wrong with Tony Scott as the director as well.

Torchur317 02-13-09 06:22 PM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 
Basic was pretty damn good....

Matthew Ackerly 02-13-09 08:12 PM

Re: Useless Remake #477: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
 

Originally Posted by DJariya (Post 9265504)
Washington and Travolta's action movies have normally been pretty good. The stinker from Denzel that I can think of from the last 5 years or so would be Out of Time. For Travolta it would be Basic.

You can't go wrong with Tony Scott as the director as well.

I like Out of Time a lot. Thought it was fantastic. It's not an action movie :shrug:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 AM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.