Saw IV (Movie discussion thread.)
#51
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Recently watched it. I had no problem following the story at all. The twist wasn't as mind blowing as I was expecting, but I liked how it all turned out overall.
It's more of a SAW 3.5 as other have said just to set up SAW 5 and 6.
I enjoy these films. Despite what most say they do have a story to them, but to each their own.
It's more of a SAW 3.5 as other have said just to set up SAW 5 and 6.
I enjoy these films. Despite what most say they do have a story to them, but to each their own.
#52
DVD Talk Special Edition
Saw 1 8/10
Saw 2 7/10
Saw 3 2/10
Saw 4 3/10
Movie was horrible. This series just contiues to go down hill.
Saw 2 7/10
Saw 3 2/10
Saw 4 3/10
Movie was horrible. This series just contiues to go down hill.
#54
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by Darkgod
Saw 1 8/10
Saw 2 7/10
Saw 3 2/10
Saw 4 3/10
Movie was horrible. This series just contiues to go down hill.
Saw 2 7/10
Saw 3 2/10
Saw 4 3/10
Movie was horrible. This series just contiues to go down hill.
Sorry
I dunno I guess maybe I'm in the minority but I enjoyed Saw IV.
#55
DVD Talk God
I also enjoyed Saw IV. The only problem I had was the conclusion which made almost no sense IMO. Hopefully Saw V will clear things up.
#56
DVD Talk Legend
Eh, wasnt great, but I cant say it was so much worse than the previous 3... With the exception of the ending, thought it was pretty decent horror movie.
#58
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Drop
I think most people enjoyed the film, not that they thought it was great, but good enough to warrant seeing Saw 5 (and 6).
#59
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Originally Posted by Matthew Chmiel
Everyone I went with opening night, which was about twelve people, all thought it sucked (myself included) and thought we were all idiots as we will most likely be there for Saw V since we've already seen the first four.
Saw 5 could clear up and null a lot of the problems of Saw 4, if it does, I'll probably have a better opinion of part 4.
#60
DVD Talk Godfather
Wow, I can't imagine that all 12 people wouldn't care for this, especially if they had some sort of enjoyment from the previous 3.
Me and my friend, while both having complaints, enjoyed it enough to see how 5 plays out. I agree that how 5 plays out can make 4 (and subsequently 3) play out far better.
Me and my friend, while both having complaints, enjoyed it enough to see how 5 plays out. I agree that how 5 plays out can make 4 (and subsequently 3) play out far better.
#61
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didn't like it.
the male leads looked too much alike. I think it may have made the timeline confusing for me.
I think detective Mathews would have made a better, more interesting accomplice. I still don't get why generic male lead 1 was in on it.
the male leads looked too much alike. I think it may have made the timeline confusing for me.
I think detective Mathews would have made a better, more interesting accomplice. I still don't get why generic male lead 1 was in on it.
#62
DVD Talk Gold Edition
I just got home from seeing Saw IV... Yes, it was confusing. I still liked it. Hopefully 5 & 6 will clear some things up.
One of my biggest complaints though... WAY too many quick flashes of things. I had to close my eyes at one point because it was irritating my eyes.
One of my biggest complaints though... WAY too many quick flashes of things. I had to close my eyes at one point because it was irritating my eyes.
Last edited by Darth Maher; 11-06-07 at 01:40 AM.
#63
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Formerly known as achau9598 - Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I finally got a chance to see this, and part of the timeline got me messed up. I mean, you have Riggs being told by the beefy detective to go home to his wife, and then they are saying that the detective has been missing. Did I miss a line somewhere? Or was that just part of the funky time issue of this film?
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kaze0
the male leads looked too much alike. I think it may have made the timeline confusing for me.
And jigsaw's wife: That lass has large tracts of land!
#67
DVD Talk Limited Edition
For some reason the saw films don't really bother me that much. I thought the third one was a nice change of pace and place it as second best in the series. For the fourth installment, I place at a tie with 2.
Good mindless fun...........that I never ruin by watching any of these films more than once.
Good mindless fun...........that I never ruin by watching any of these films more than once.
#71
Suspended
I saw the first three films back to back about a month ago. Thought they were great.
I never knew where I was in the timeline during Saw 4. They're really reaching at this point. I would have been fine with 3 being the final film, but also would have been okay with part 4 had it continued on logically from where 3 ended.
Anyone know how the director's cut differs from the theatrical? The DC is what I saw.
I never knew where I was in the timeline during Saw 4. They're really reaching at this point. I would have been fine with 3 being the final film, but also would have been okay with part 4 had it continued on logically from where 3 ended.
Anyone know how the director's cut differs from the theatrical? The DC is what I saw.
#72
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 5,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by lotsofdvds
I saw the first three films back to back about a month ago. Thought they were great.
I never knew where I was in the timeline during Saw 4. They're really reaching at this point. I would have been fine with 3 being the final film, but also would have been okay with part 4 had it continued on logically from where 3 ended.
Anyone know how the director's cut differs from the theatrical? The DC is what I saw.
I never knew where I was in the timeline during Saw 4. They're really reaching at this point. I would have been fine with 3 being the final film, but also would have been okay with part 4 had it continued on logically from where 3 ended.
Anyone know how the director's cut differs from the theatrical? The DC is what I saw.
Originally Posted by REL77
did anyone notice that Jigsaws wife's necklace, it looks remarkably like a Key? Could she be involved in SAW V?
#73
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: High above the Mucky Muck
Posts: 5,054
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Rented it, wondered where i knew the FBI agent from, thought it sucked when i was watching it, fell asleep halfway thru it. Woke up, wanted to get my moneys worth before i took it back to the rental store so i finished watching it and the movie did not stop sucking. After the movie was over, i got on IMDB and found out that the FBI agent was the dipshit who wore his hat backwards all the time on the Gilmore Girls. So at least i solved that mystery.
And that ladies and gentlemen, was my Saw IV experience.
Can't believe thats Betsy Russell from Private School and Tomboy. I didn't reconize her at all. She still looks damn good.
And that ladies and gentlemen, was my Saw IV experience.
Originally Posted by chrisfelice
I agree 100% on this one.. Didn't have a clue who was who at the end...
And jigsaw's wife: That lass has large tracts of land!
And jigsaw's wife: That lass has large tracts of land!