![]() |
Re: The Hobbit
What of the rumours of Ian McKellan and Christopher Lee returning as Gandalf and Saruman? Any truth to that?
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by JumpCutz
(Post 11330962)
There is also a late breaking rumor that Jackson will be directing all three films and they are going to be filmed in 3D. I'm trying to get confirmation.
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara
(Post 11331067)
What happened to Del Toro?
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 11331086)
And isn't MGM on the verge of bankruptcy?
|
Re: The Hobbit
Stuart Townsend will be recording a new version of Kiss's "Beth" for the soundtrack! :banana:
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by kd5
(Post 11330894)
I sincerely hope that the rumors regarding the splitting of The Hobbit into 3 parts is unfounded. I think it would be a travesty to the extreme. It's bad enough for the impatient that it's going to be in two parts (2 years), making us wait 3 years to see the whole movie would royally piss me off. While taking the additional time to flesh out the extravaganza over 2 movies would give Jackson a chance to do the movie as much justice as he did with LOTR (and ultimately be more satisfying to people like me), doing so over 3 seems more like abuse to me. -kd5-
|
Re: The Hobbit
Three movies? Really? Ugh. I just don't think I have the energy...
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by Bandoman
(Post 11331197)
Three movies? Really? Ugh. I just don't think I have the energy...
|
Re: The Hobbit
Official Hobbit 3D glasses Giveaway
http://latino-review.com/wp-content/...occhiali02.jpg http://latino-review.com/wp-content/...occhiali01.jpg Source |
Re: The Hobbit
.....I'm assuming they give us those correct?
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
(Post 11331262)
.....I'm assuming they give us those correct?
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by Anubis2005X
(Post 11331154)
Actually, if it were two movies, you'd only wait one year in between to see the whole film. And only two years if it is three movies...
(No way I'm wearing those dorky 3D glasses.) |
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by Sonic
(Post 11331260)
Official Hobbit 3D glasses Giveaway
http://latino-review.com/wp-content/...occhiali02.jpg http://latino-review.com/wp-content/...occhiali01.jpg Source |
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by Sonic
(Post 11331260)
Official Hobbit 3D glasses Giveaway
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by RoboDad
(Post 11331383)
What's the "giveaway" part?
Avengers had similar custom glasses, but those cost an additional $5: http://collider.com/avengers-3d-glasses/141505/ |
Re: The Hobbit
Harry Potter (also WB) had free ones too.
|
Re: The Hobbit
Ah, OK, thanks. I was curious if there was going to be some kind of contest for them, or if it would just be up to theater chains to choose to give them away.
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by Pizza
(Post 11331294)
(No way I'm wearing those dorky 3D glasses.) |
Re: The Hobbit
Holy shit, those are ugly.
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 11330924)
It's not a rumor. Peter Jackson posted the news on his Facebook account. The announcement has been quoted twice on this thread already.
Here it is again:
Originally Posted by Anubis2005X
(Post 11331154)
Actually, if it were two movies, you'd only wait one year in between to see the whole film. And only two years if it is three movies...
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by pinata242
(Post 11331413)
Harry Potter (also WB) had free ones too.
But those ones for Hobbit? WTF? i'm just glad they're "compatible with passive 3d tvs, monitors, and laptops"; just like the ones the ancient races of Middle Earth had. |
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by kd5
(Post 11331569)
Forgive me for not reading through 1,380 posts to see that.
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 11331611)
The quotes were posts 1307 and 1327, both made on 7/30, and yours was post 1381, so you would've had to have read the previous 53 posts, about two pages and about two days worth of posts. I'm not sure it's an unreasonable expectation that you've read at least a few days worth of recent posts before commenting in a 5 year old thread.
|
Re: The Hobbit
Or maybe 3-5 posts above yours to see if people are already talking about it? I mean, it was only 20 posts, superdeluxe! ;)
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 11331611)
The quotes were posts 1307 and 1327, both made on 7/30, and yours was post 1381, so you would've had to have read the previous 53 posts, about two pages and about two days worth of posts. I'm not sure it's an unreasonable expectation that you've read at least a few days worth of recent posts before commenting in a 5 year old thread.
Originally Posted by RoboDad
(Post 11331749)
Or maybe take 5 seconds to do a quick Google search for something like "hobbit movie trilogy", which returns "Peter Jackson splits 'The Hobbit' into three films" as its first news result.
Both of you can bite me. -kd5- |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.