Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

The Hobbit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-12 | 12:01 PM
  #1501  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 41,591
Received 1,807 Likes on 1,294 Posts
From: Kansas City, MO
Re: The Hobbit

I wonder how many people that will have both 24fpm and 48fpm available locally will see both just to see the difference. And which one would you want to see first?
Old 04-29-12 | 12:04 PM
  #1502  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 41,591
Received 1,807 Likes on 1,294 Posts
From: Kansas City, MO
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by Strevlac
When it comes to movies, I disagree. Easier, cheaper and more convenient doesn't make talented people better, it makes them lazier. And it removes the barrier of entry to a hell of a lot more untalented people.
I never said it will make talented people better. I'm talking about just getting a movie made. Period.
Old 04-29-12 | 12:08 PM
  #1503  
bluetoast's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,880
Received 324 Likes on 244 Posts
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by TomOpus
I wonder how many people that will have both 24fpm and 48fpm available locally will see both just to see the difference. And which one would you want to see first?
Depending on if I like the movie I would see it twice, but 48 fps first. But first I would also have to actually finish watching the trilogy, which I still haven't done.
Old 04-29-12 | 12:10 PM
  #1504  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by Strevlac
It seems clear to me that cinema (or cinema as I define it) is dying. No film. No film projection. Smaller scale productions created entirely with digital equipment, where the production value comes from a computer that does all of the heavy lifting. Anything a person has to do is randomly thrown together as quickly as possible with little regard to craft (storyboarding, blocking, camerawork, editing). "We'll fix it in post." Where there is no difference between TV and "the movies." Visible digital pixels and 48fps in a movie theater and people don't care...as long as The Hulk shows up to smash some shit in the latest comic book turd (with RoboDad and his RoboBrats cheering obnoxiously).
....have you seen The Avengers yet?

I'm not sure if you've ever worked on a film. Film or digital....will always need people there. Film has been edited on a computer for years. Kahn is one of the few who still does it for Spielberg. I'm not sure who else...maybe Schoonmaker still does...though being a teacher in film I don't think she'd benefit too much in still teaching a moviola to the young kids trying to get in it now..though it would still be badass to do so. Also...going digital doesn't mean it can all be fixed in post. Fuck that. Post is a bitch to "try" to fix something you disregarded in the actual filming process. You leave it to post all the time..you're not going to get anywhere creatively. It's just going to let you try to clean up or whatever your use of it is for to make it "better"

storyboarding, blocking, camerawork, editing, etc will always exist unless something isn't needed cuz of the digital medium. Again...I'm not sure you know how it works exactly.

Talent will surpass whatever medium they use.
Old 04-29-12 | 12:13 PM
  #1505  
bluetoast's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,880
Received 324 Likes on 244 Posts
Re: The Hobbit

I imagine a "digital" movieola in the future, with touch screen tablets set up on a table such that it can emulate the console. Now that would be badass.
Old 04-29-12 | 12:17 PM
  #1506  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,082
Received 826 Likes on 576 Posts
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by RocShemp
24 fps was just an economical decision of "how low/cheap can we go before movemement looks absolutely horrible" since more fps means longer reels. These days it might be viewed aesthetically [pleasing] by some but that was never the intent.
This is a good point. It should be pointed out that framerate was a widely discussed topic at the beginning of motion pictures. Faster framerates were typically thought of as better quality, but economics ultimately won out.

http://web.archive.org/web/201107081...lf/18_kb_2.htm
Controversy over speed dogged silent films from the start. Thomas Edison recommended a speed of 46 frames per second- 'anything less will strain the eye.' As historian Gordon Hendricks wrote in his book "The Edison Motion Picture Myth": 'There would seem to be no good reason for it. This rate was far above any rate necessary for gaining the persistence of vision.' H.A.V. Bulleid points out, however, that Edison's decision was a sensible one: 'To obviate flicker from white light projected on a bright surface requires about 48 obscurations per second.' Nevertheless, Edison films did not follow this recommendation for long. Apart from anything else, it used too much film. It also reduced the exposure, and film stock was not fast. But Edison films were photographed much faster than the films of most other companies- although Hendricks found them varying as much as 15 fps in a single day. An Edison film of 1900 will generally project satisfactorily at 24 fps. Edison's rival, the American Mutoscope and Biograph Company, used a camera which weighed 1700 lbs. This camera had a motor, and it turned at a speed of 40 fps. Billy Bitzer operated one. (Curiously, his later films were characterised by a remarkably slow camera speed.)
It should be noted that projector companies solved the problem of flicker with the slow 24fps framrate by using two-blade and eventually three-blade shutters, where the projector displays the same frame of film up to 3 times, creating a psuedo-framerate of 72fps:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_rate#Background
Old 04-29-12 | 12:23 PM
  #1507  
RoboDad's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 5,960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: A far green country
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by TomOpus
I wonder how many people that will have both 24fpm and 48fpm available locally will see both just to see the difference. And which one would you want to see first?
If I have the option to see the film in 48fps, I will definitely do that first, and then decide whether I "need" to see it in 24fps for my second viewing, or if 48fps will be the preferable frame rate for me.
Old 04-29-12 | 12:27 PM
  #1508  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
....have you seen The Avengers yet?

I'm not sure if you've ever worked on a film. Film or digital....will always need people there. Film has been edited on a computer for years. Kahn is one of the few who still does it for Spielberg. I'm not sure who else...maybe Schoonmaker still does...though being a teacher in film I don't think she'd benefit too much in still teaching a moviola to the young kids trying to get in it now..though it would still be badass to do so. Also...going digital doesn't mean it can all be fixed in post. Fuck that. Post is a bitch to "try" to fix something you disregarded in the actual filming process. You leave it to post all the time..you're not going to get anywhere creatively. It's just going to let you try to clean up or whatever your use of it is for to make it "better"

storyboarding, blocking, camerawork, editing, etc will always exist unless something isn't needed cuz of the digital medium. Again...I'm not sure you know how it works exactly.

Talent will surpass whatever medium they use.
Sure sure. But you can't tell me that it isn't a hell of a lot more prevalent today than it was before the digital era. How many people edit in camera today instead of just shooting a bunch of coverage and figuring it out in FinalCut Pro? Or just randomely having the steadicam guy wandering around the scene and pointing in the general direction of the point of interest? How many scenes do we see where people are in a room talking to each other and the camera is just going in circles? How many people today take the time in these small scenes and actually create different, specifically motivated camera setups? How much care is given to lighting and lenses? Hitchcock would fire every single one of these hacks.

The point is, very few care about these cinematic fundamentals anymore. And I mean both the people making movies and the people watching movies. These things require time, consideration, and cinematic storytelling ability. Things that pro-quick and easy folks hate because they want to get to their digital toys as quickly as possible.
Old 04-29-12 | 12:41 PM
  #1509  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: The Hobbit

I'd say...a lot of people still care about the cinematic fundamentals. I'm not sure what motivates you to think otherwise but you're wrong.
Old 04-29-12 | 01:08 PM
  #1510  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by Strevlac
Listen RoboDork, emotional response is the entire point. That's what movies are all about. If people respond emotionally to this change in a negative way, then they are right. This isn't science class.
Mod Note: Listen, Strevlac, we don't allow personal attacks here. You care about what you think is important in film, but not everyone has the same opinion as you, and that's okay. If you can't discuss it without being rude, then you will be suspended or banned.
Old 04-29-12 | 01:29 PM
  #1511  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: The Hobbit

Don't know if anyone else has brought this up yet, but has anyone actually seen a film-based projection with a higher framerate (48 fps or 60 fps)? I remember Showscan back in the day, which I think was 60 fps, and I believe Soarin' Over California at DCA uses 48 fps IMAX. I've seen both of those, and neither of them gave off that "Korean soap opera" feeling, which leads me to believe it's less a problem with the framerate specifically, and has more to do with using digital instead of film (or that the possible problems with a higher framerate are compounded by the digital aspect).
Old 04-29-12 | 01:39 PM
  #1512  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Re: The Hobbit

48fps IMAX has existed for a while, and I've never heard anyone say it looks like a soap opera (Soaring Over California certainly doesn't). But yes, this might be a digital versus film thing. Perhaps digital looks too clean, and when paired with the higher framerate, just looks too off from what some people consider "natural" for cinema.

I do think it's a bad idea to look at 120/240 hz TV's and say that this is what The Hobbit must look like. Those TV's are using 24fps sources and extrapolating. If the source is 48fps it should look a lot better.

Now I might go out of my way to see The Hobbit in 48fps just to have an opinion on the matter.
Old 04-29-12 | 02:08 PM
  #1513  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 41,591
Received 1,807 Likes on 1,294 Posts
From: Kansas City, MO
Re: The Hobbit

Per wiki regarding Soaring Over California:

The scenes were shot with an IMAX HD frame rate - 48 frames per second, twice the conventional output for regular films.
As noted above, I will agree with the others that it does not look like video.
Old 04-29-12 | 03:51 PM
  #1514  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,037
Likes: 0
Received 99 Likes on 73 Posts
From: Very far away..
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by The Bus
I don't have an opinion either way (since I haven't seen it), but saying it looks like a "Korean soap opera" is one of the funniest put-downs I can think of.
It's also not an accurate description of the problem. I'll say it looks more like an sports event on HDTV.
Old 04-29-12 | 07:13 PM
  #1515  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: The Hobbit

could someone show me wtf a Korean Soap Opera looks like? I know that Spanish Soaps and the US Soaps look like..but know nothing on Korea's.
Old 04-29-12 | 07:36 PM
  #1516  
Banned by request
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,800
Received 779 Likes on 583 Posts
From: Goodbye and Good Luck
Re: The Hobbit

It's exactly like a telenovela - but with hot Korean women.
Old 04-29-12 | 07:50 PM
  #1517  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 47,816
Received 2,297 Likes on 1,426 Posts
From: Rosemount, MN
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by Strevlac
When it comes to movies, I disagree. Easier, cheaper and more convenient doesn't make talented people better, it makes them lazier. And it removes the barrier of entry to a hell of a lot more untalented people.
Yes, let's keep moviemaking as complicated, expensive and time consuming as possible.

Every innovation that has ever happened in cinema (including what you claim to enjoy) was made to make things more convenient, cheaper, faster, etc. You just latched onto a particular period of time in the industry and seem to expect it to freeze there. That's not how technology works (which is a huge part of filmmaking.)

I once worked with a graphic designer who hated filters in Photoshop. He literally believed you should blur each pixel individually. Of course, he was using PHOTOSHOP and not doing it with a horsehair brush with ink he made himself onto papyrus he pressed that morning. He picked one point in the industry and expected things to never advance further. He also didn't have the talent to justify his viewpoint.

I'm sorry you can't see the creativity and potential that lower costs, accessible equipment and affordable post-production has brought to the industry. It's absolutely your loss.

Last edited by Draven; 04-30-12 at 09:28 AM.
Old 04-29-12 | 08:29 PM
  #1518  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by trespoochies
It's exactly like a telenovela - but with hot Korean women.
oh ok...so still better than the shitty US Soaps correct? That's the one thing I love about Mexican telenovelas. one season..but goddamn is that season packed w/ crazy ass drama and wonderful tits abound.
Old 04-30-12 | 12:04 AM
  #1519  
Nick Danger's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 32,965
Received 2,387 Likes on 1,483 Posts
From: Albuquerque
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by Strevlac
When it comes to movies, I disagree. Easier, cheaper and more convenient doesn't make talented people better, it makes them lazier. And it removes the barrier of entry to a hell of a lot more untalented people.
Do you think that movie cameras should be cranked by men with super-steady hands, and that cross-fades should be done on the negative in the camera?

You sound like one of those people who thinks that all improvements made before you turned eighteen are good and natural, but everything after that is opposed to True Art.
Old 04-30-12 | 11:37 AM
  #1520  
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: The Hobbit

I'm someone who really enjoys black & white movies, and think in some way they're better than colour, but I understand why most films today are colour, and while there's a few b&w moderns that are great (Ed Wood, The Man Who Wasn't There), it would be pretentious if all movies today were made that way.

I can't wait for higher frame-rate movies, and hope it becomes a standard soon (don't care about 3D, though).
Old 04-30-12 | 01:22 PM
  #1521  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,037
Likes: 0
Received 99 Likes on 73 Posts
From: Very far away..
Re: The Hobbit

At least black & white AND color movies both look like.....movies.
Old 04-30-12 | 01:34 PM
  #1522  
Why So Blu?'s Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 40,403
Received 1,763 Likes on 1,341 Posts
From: Los Angeles
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
oh ok...so still better than the shitty US Soaps correct? That's the one thing I love about Mexican telenovelas. one season..but goddamn is that season packed w/ crazy ass drama and wonderful tits abound.

Si, se puede!
Old 04-30-12 | 02:11 PM
  #1523  
bunkaroo's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16,400
Received 206 Likes on 139 Posts
From: Chicago West Suburbs
Re: The Hobbit

I will check it out in 48fps to judge for myself but I am not encouraged by what I've read. But since PJ gave me probably the best movie experience of my life since the original Star Wars trilogy, I'm willing to give it a shot. I will likely see it at midnight so whatever option is available is what I'll go with for the first viewing. I won't be doing any 3-D though (see sig).
Old 04-30-12 | 02:20 PM
  #1524  
Hailey G's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,024
Received 1,052 Likes on 489 Posts
From: Detroit, formerly known as Obi-Wanma
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by bunkaroo
I will check it out in 48fps to judge for myself but I am not encouraged by what I've read. But since PJ gave me probably the best movie experience of my life since the original Star Wars trilogy, I'm willing to give it a shot. I will likely see it at midnight so whatever option is available is what I'll go with for the first viewing. I won't be doing any 3-D though (see sig).
I wouldn't be surprised if the only way to see it in 48fps is in 3D. Theater owners who have sprung for the equipment will likely want to maximize their profits.
Old 04-30-12 | 02:40 PM
  #1525  
Shannon Nutt's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,591
Received 413 Likes on 310 Posts
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Re: The Hobbit

This is going to be an interesting movie to see the reviews from...if the story and acting are on par with the LOTR trilogy, but the movie provides an awful visual experience, will fanboys (and girls) love it or loath it?


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.