Open to interpretation vs. Incoherent mess
#51
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Originally Posted by jessecrx
Wow, what a juicy topic!
First movie that comes to mind is Eyes Wide Shut
I remember reading a post about a year ago about the possibilities and it blew my mind.
First movie that comes to mind is Eyes Wide Shut
I remember reading a post about a year ago about the possibilities and it blew my mind.
Yeah, Eyes Wide Shut is one of my all-time favorite Kubrick films since it lends itself so well to multiple viewings.
Funny how some people mention Memento and American Psycho. Personally, I think the ending is so obvious there is actually nothing open to interpretation.
What I don't like is when directors try the "incoherent mess" angle to end a film, in a cheap attempt to spark discussion about it and get people to talk about how brilliant it was. I'm sorry, but I feel there is a fine line between open to interpretation vs. incoherent mess, and an incoherent mess is not brilliant.
I also think there are situations where people see things in movies that they want to see, but it isn't actually there, nor was it ever intended by the director. I have a cozy interpretation of Mulholland Drive that allows me to sleep at night, but I doubt if even David Lynch can truly explain aspects of this movie.
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, I just watched Barton Fink and I really don't know what the hell to think of that other than I didn't really like it. The more theories and interpretations I read about the movie (and there are MANY) the more I think it's just deliberately an incoherent mess... Anybody care to weigh in on what they think about this movie?
#54
Moderator
Barton Fink is a masterpiece.