Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

The Golden Compass

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-07 | 11:13 PM
  #176  
GreenMonkey's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,578
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Originally Posted by FunkDaddy J
I just read this article from Mark Morford, a San Francisco Chronicle columnist I love to read.

"Jesus Loves 'His Dark Materials'"
...
It goes like this: If your ancient, authoritarian, immutable belief system is truly threatened by a handful of popular novels, if your ostensibly all-powerful, unyielding creed is rendered meek and defenseless when faced with the story of a fiery, rebellious young girl who effortlessly rejects your stiff misogynistic religiosity in favor of adventure, love, sex, the ability to discover and define her soul on her own terms, well, it might be time for you to roll it all up and shut it all down and crawl back home, and let the divine breathe and move and dance as she sees fit. Don't you agree?
Thank was a fantastic editorial, and very funny. Thanks for posting it.

It's so funny when the don't let your kids be exposed to unreligious ideas type folks get agitated over something. Or in the words of Kevin Smith with the protests over Dogma -

"It's a movie with a f---ing rubber poop monster in it,"

Lighten up people. Focus on keeping your kids from REALLY doing things they shouldn't. Like maybe their online video game playing. So I wouldn't have to listen to your kids calling me a f***king f** on Xbox live all night.

Last edited by GreenMonkey; 12-06-07 at 11:23 PM.
Old 12-07-07 | 08:08 AM
  #177  
Jason Bovberg's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer Emeritus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,644
Received 189 Likes on 114 Posts
From: Fort Collins, CO
Originally Posted by Joe Molotov
Golden Compass: Please increase it's Rotten Tomatoes ranking by not making a crappy movie!
Yeah...(sigh)...it appears you're right...I'll still be taking my daughter to see it, as we've just finished the book. The book is slow-going at first, but really picks up nicely and becomes a joy.
Old 12-07-07 | 09:22 AM
  #178  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 30,012
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Madison, WI ("77 square miles surrounded by reality")
The U.S. Catholic Bishops say the film is O.K. - good, even.

http://www.kansascity.com/entertainm...ry/392412.html

Posted on Thu, Dec. 06, 2007 10:15 PM
Catholic bishops give thumbs-up to ‘Golden Compass’
By ROBERT W. BUTLER
The Kansas City Star

“The Golden Compass” — and Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials trilogy of novels on which it is based — has been criticized in some quarters for being anti-religious and specifically anti-Catholic.

But the U.S. Conference of Bishops recently issued its official review of the film, and it’s a rave.

Writing for the Catholic News Service (catholicnews .com), critics Harry Forbes and John Mulderig call the movie “lavish, well-acted and fast-paced.”

“The good news,” they write, “is that the first book’s explicit references to this church have been completely excised, with only the term Magisterium retained.

“The choice is still a bit unfortunate, however, as the word refers so specifically to the church’s teaching authority.

“Yet the film’s only clue that the Magisterium is a religious body comes in the form of the icons which decorate one of their local headquarters.

“Most moviegoers with no foreknowledge of the books or Pullman’s personal belief system will scarcely be aware of religious connotations, and can approach the movie as a pure fantasy-adventure. This is not the blatant real-world anti-Catholicism of, say, the recent ‘Elizabeth: The Golden Age’ or ‘The Da Vinci Code.’ Religious elements, as such, are practically nil.”

While noting that “Pullman’s fanciful universe has a patchwork feel, with elements culled from other fantasy-adventure stories — most especially The Chronicles of Narnia (a work Pullman disdains),” the review goes on to say that the film has “hardly a dull moment.”

Whatever Pullman’s motives in writing the story, the film “can be viewed as an exciting adventure story with, at its core, a traditional struggle between good and evil and a generalized rejection of authoritarianism,” the review says.

“To the extent that Lyra” — the movie’s young heroine — “and her allies are taking a stand on behalf of free will in opposition to the coercive force of the Magisterium, they are of course acting entirely in harmony with Catholic teaching. The heroism and self-sacrifice that they demonstrate provide appropriate moral lessons …

“Is Pullman trying to undermine anyone’s belief in God? Leaving the books aside and focusing on what has ended up on screen, the script can reasonably be interpreted in the broadest sense as an appeal against the abuse of political power.”

Addressing the question of whether the film may inspire teens to read all three books, the writers suggest that “rather than banning the movie or books, parents might instead take the opportunity to talk through any thorny philosophical issues with their teens.”

The religious themes of the later books may be more prominent in the follow-up films, they note, but for now “this film — altered, as it is, from its source material — rates as intelligent and well-crafted entertainment.”
Old 12-07-07 | 10:12 AM
  #179  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Clearly the Bishops didn't get the email.
Old 12-07-07 | 10:42 AM
  #180  
Brack's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,011
Received 63 Likes on 40 Posts
From: near Cincinnati
I've never seen a 4 star review from Ebert that I hated, so I'm definitely checking this out.
Old 12-07-07 | 12:13 PM
  #181  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,278
Received 495 Likes on 355 Posts
Just got back from seeing it and I *LOVED* it. It moved along at a nice clip. The special effects were beautiful. As was Nicole Kidman. And Dakota Blue Richards was spectacular. I cannot believe this was her first movie. Whoever picked her deserves a raise and promotion.
Old 12-07-07 | 03:32 PM
  #182  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Berkeley, CA
Does Ebert just throw out 4-star reviews on a whim, now that he knows he's about to kick the bucket? He's probably given twice as many this year as any other year I've read him, or at least it feels like it.
Old 12-07-07 | 04:15 PM
  #183  
Brack's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,011
Received 63 Likes on 40 Posts
From: near Cincinnati
Originally Posted by hardercore
Does Ebert just throw out 4-star reviews on a whim, now that he knows he's about to kick the bucket? He's probably given twice as many this year as any other year I've read him, or at least it feels like it.
Movie Answer Man

BY ROGER EBERT FILM CRITIC / October 26, 2007

Q. It seems that your reviews since your return from illness are "nicer." Are you viewing life and films differently now? I can't remember ever seeing so many three- to four-star reviews from you, week after week, as I have in the past few months. Or do you think that movies are just getting better? What has changed, you or the quality of the films?
Garry Hasara, Tampa, Fla.

A. Maybe I'm just so happy to be writing reviews. Or maybe several other factors are at work: (1) Oscar season began in September, and autumn movies are traditionally superior to those of other seasons, (2) I no longer automatically review virtually every movie released and so tend to choose the ones that seem more interesting, (3) distributors have stopped screening most horror films for critics, (4) I enjoy calling attention to less-known indie films and tend to choose those I like, and (5) when I double back to review a movie that I missed earlier, of course I don't go looking for lousy ones.

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/...710250314/1023
Old 12-07-07 | 04:16 PM
  #184  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 30,012
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Madison, WI ("77 square miles surrounded by reality")
Just saw it and I wanted to love it because I love the books but I just couldn't. Too rushed, too episodic. I thought the pace was good at the beginning but became rushed around the time Lyra
Spoiler:
was rescued by the Gyptians.
The movie could easily have been 30-40 minutes longer.

Also, it didn't grab me emotionally like the book. It seemed a little distant and cool.

On the plus side it looked great technically and Dakota Blue Richards is an amazing find.

**½/****

What I am hoping against hope is that there is a much longer fleshed-out director's cut that we'll see on DVD.
Old 12-07-07 | 06:32 PM
  #185  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
I caught this one today myself, and I hated it. Weitz has no clue how to handle an action movie. Or an epic. The compositions and editing were so awkward, and the big epic moments were underplayed, while smaller and less dramatic scenes got far more pomp than they deserved. The film was far too rushed. Characters would pop in, say their names, and then immediately begin moving the plot along. No character development. The film also had this annoying habit of making many of the characters call each other by their first and last names all the time.

So many of the problems stem from the filmmaking. Weitz either doesn't understand how or refuses to extend sequences to maximize suspense or excitement. And the camera is maddeningly flat. How many medium two shots with a cutaway to a wide shot can we see? In order to have a sweeping epic, you need to do a little sweeping sometimes.

And the movie doesn't go out of its way to explain anything. If you haven't read the book you will walk out wondering why anybody thought this was a good idea for a film. Just massively disappointing all the way through. Even more annoying, you could see how the movie could have been a lot of fun had New Line handed the directorial reigns to anyone else. Christ, even Paul W.S. Anderson could have done better. Chris Weitz was simply the wrong person to have involved with this. Apparently, before Weitz was involved, Tom Stoppard wrote a treatment for the movie. When Weitz came in, he didn't even look at what Stoppard had done before doing his own thing. What a boneheaded move.

Even if this does somehow become a hit (and with the budget reportedly ballooning to close to $200 million, I don't see how it could be), I sincerely hope that Weitz isn't asked back for the sequels.

Edit: I did enjoy the CGI on the smaller daemons. Anything bigger than a cat looked really fake, though, including the bears.
Old 12-07-07 | 06:59 PM
  #186  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
I caught this one today myself, and I hated it. Weitz has no clue how to handle an action movie. Or an epic. The compositions and editing were so awkward, and the big epic moments were underplayed, while smaller and less dramatic scenes got far more pomp than they deserved. The film was far too rushed. Characters would pop in, say their names, and then immediately begin moving the plot along. No character development. The film also had this annoying habit of making many of the characters call each other by their first and last names all the time.

So many of the problems stem from the filmmaking. Weitz either doesn't understand how or refuses to extend sequences to maximize suspense or excitement. And the camera is maddeningly flat. How many medium two shots with a cutaway to a wide shot can we see? In order to have a sweeping epic, you need to do a little sweeping sometimes.

And the movie doesn't go out of its way to explain anything. If you haven't read the book you will walk out wondering why anybody thought this was a good idea for a film. Just massively disappointing all the way through. Even more annoying, you could see how the movie could have been a lot of fun had New Line handed the directorial reigns to anyone else. Christ, even Paul W.S. Anderson could have done better. Chris Weitz was simply the wrong person to have involved with this. Apparently, before Weitz was involved, Tom Stoppard wrote a treatment for the movie. When Weitz came in, he didn't even look at what Stoppard had done before doing his own thing. What a boneheaded move.

Even if this does somehow become a hit (and with the budget reportedly ballooning to close to $200 million, I don't see how it could be), I sincerely hope that Weitz isn't asked back for the sequels.

Edit: I did enjoy the CGI on the smaller daemons. Anything bigger than a cat looked really fake, though, including the bears.
im going to have to agree with pretty much everything you said. i enjoyed Narnia without having read the books, but Golden Compass was just a bore. And the CGI effects were way to obvious considering the budget on this film.

There were two scenes which i somewhat enjoyed more than the rest of the film (the bear fight and the "exploading toaster"). i also took that the powers of Golden Compass itself werent even that cool.
Old 12-07-07 | 08:48 PM
  #187  
Giles's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
I caught this one today myself, and I hated it. Weitz has no clue how to handle an action movie. Or an epic. The compositions and editing were so awkward, and the big epic moments were underplayed, while smaller and less dramatic scenes got far more pomp than they deserved. The film was far too rushed. Characters would pop in, say their names, and then immediately begin moving the plot along. No character development. The film also had this annoying habit of making many of the characters call each other by their first and last names all the time.

So many of the problems stem from the filmmaking. Weitz either doesn't understand how or refuses to extend sequences to maximize suspense or excitement. And the camera is maddeningly flat. How many medium two shots with a cutaway to a wide shot can we see? In order to have a sweeping epic, you need to do a little sweeping sometimes.

And the movie doesn't go out of its way to explain anything. If you haven't read the book you will walk out wondering why anybody thought this was a good idea for a film. Just massively disappointing all the way through. Even more annoying, you could see how the movie could have been a lot of fun had New Line handed the directorial reigns to anyone else. Christ, even Paul W.S. Anderson could have done better. Chris Weitz was simply the wrong person to have involved with this. Apparently, before Weitz was involved, Tom Stoppard wrote a treatment for the movie. When Weitz came in, he didn't even look at what Stoppard had done before doing his own thing. What a boneheaded move.

Even if this does somehow become a hit (and with the budget reportedly ballooning to close to $200 million, I don't see how it could be), I sincerely hope that Weitz isn't asked back for the sequels.

Edit: I did enjoy the CGI on the smaller daemons. Anything bigger than a cat looked really fake, though, including the bears.
I hope so too...

granted I knew the movie is part of a trilogy, the ending was an eyeroller because the entire movie felt like an overextended teaser for a (hopefully) much better second movie. Even though I hadn't read the book, I felt like there was alot missing.

Secondly it didn't help that the DLP presentation I saw was terribly flawed, this is the second time I've seen a DLP film on Cinema De Suck's auditorium 8, and while it's a great big screen, the system itself has a lot of bugs, this go around there was a constant flicker throughtout the entire film which while subtle, was still damn annoying to me.

oh and that horrid end song over the end credits - yuck!

Last edited by Giles; 12-07-07 at 08:53 PM.
Old 12-07-07 | 09:04 PM
  #188  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,278
Received 495 Likes on 355 Posts
Given that Chris Weitz has only directed "About a Boy" and "American Pie" (both with his brother Paul), I think he did an exceptional job with "The Golden Compass". Sure, a more accomplished "action" director probably would have made this movie soar. But I still enjoyed it a great deal. I thought Chris did a great job. Especially given his limited directing experience.
Old 12-07-07 | 09:09 PM
  #189  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
If you think about it, Peter Jackson wasn't an accomplished action director, either. He did mostly low budget horror and then Heavenly Creatures, a drama, and The Frighteners, a comedy. It's not about achievement in action, it's about understanding how to use the tools at your disposal. And for what it's worth, I adore About A Boy.
Old 12-07-07 | 09:14 PM
  #190  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 30,012
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Madison, WI ("77 square miles surrounded by reality")
Originally Posted by Giles
oh and that horrid end song over the end credits - yuck!
That song really did suck. It looked like they were going for an Academy Award LOTR type song.

Uh uh.
Old 12-07-07 | 09:15 PM
  #191  
Giles's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
If you think about it, Peter Jackson wasn't an accomplished action director, either. He did mostly low budget horror and then Heavenly Creatures, a drama, and The Frighteners, a comedy. It's not about achievement in action, it's about understanding how to use the tools at your disposal. And for what it's worth, I adore About A Boy.
but as I and a few others have pointed out, it seems like the most obvious flaw is that the movie is disjointed and doesn't flow well, the question is, how much footage was shot, if in fact there's more footage can a longer cut actually improve it overall? Peter Jackson's extended cut of The Two Towers is an excellent example where the reinstated footage improved the film greatly.
Old 12-07-07 | 09:15 PM
  #192  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,278
Received 495 Likes on 355 Posts
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
And for what it's worth, I adore About A Boy.
Me too! It's one of my all-time favorite films. Top 5. Just a perfect movie IMO.
Old 12-07-07 | 09:18 PM
  #193  
Giles's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
Originally Posted by movielib
That song really did suck. It looked like they were going for an Academy Award LOTR type song.

Uh uh.
what was funny was that the young woman in front of me was also quite vocal about that song - 'ugh, shut up'

"lyrah... Lyraaah..... Lyraaauuuuh"

Old 12-07-07 | 09:35 PM
  #194  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Traverse City, MI
Originally Posted by Daytripper
Given that Chris Weitz has only directed "About a Boy" and "American Pie" (both with his brother Paul), I think he did an exceptional job with "The Golden Compass". Sure, a more accomplished "action" director probably would have made this movie soar. But I still enjoyed it a great deal. I thought Chris did a great job. Especially given his limited directing experience.

I liked it too, I thought it was much better then the Narnia flick. Nicole Kidman looked great and I thought the movie was handled very well by Chris Weitz. I agree with some who said it could of been longer.
Old 12-08-07 | 03:20 AM
  #195  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Originally Posted by Giles
but as I and a few others have pointed out, it seems like the most obvious flaw is that the movie is disjointed and doesn't flow well, the question is, how much footage was shot, if in fact there's more footage can a longer cut actually improve it overall? Peter Jackson's extended cut of The Two Towers is an excellent example where the reinstated footage improved the film greatly.
I can't agree with you enough about The Two Towers. It turned the worst film in the LOTR trilogy into the best of the three. But the theatrical cut of The Two Towers still feels like a full film, just not as good of a full film as the other two theatrical cuts. The Golden Compass was not just disjointed, it was technically deficient. You can't shoot The Golden Compass like About A Boy, it just doesn't work. Weitz doesn't have the grand vision required to make this work, and I think you could add in two more hours of footage and have many of the same underlying problems.
Old 12-08-07 | 06:16 AM
  #196  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Daydream Nation
I'm watching this and no religous zealot nor any self proclaimed guardian of morality is gonna stop me.
Old 12-08-07 | 08:13 AM
  #197  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by FunkDaddy J
But what's the motive behind movements like these? Is it insecurity? Is it a feeling of collective shielding against ideas that differ from those of the insular group? It's fascinating in a sociological sense. But also annoying.
Well what's behind this post? Insecurity?

Does making the film more successful help your self esteem because in some weird way it champions your views?

Sheesh...
Old 12-08-07 | 11:19 AM
  #198  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,830
Received 382 Likes on 289 Posts
From: Seattle, WA
A shame about it bombing and not even being received well critically. Looks like chances for a follow-up are very slim indeed...I don't think it has anything to do with the supposed controversy, rather just the reasons that've been given right here...quality.

So, did they in fact shoot the last part of the book? (the twist which I know nothing about) If so, at least hopefully we'll get an extended cut that stands on it's own a little better. Still wanting to check this one out.

Also, just wondering...Kidman's character is called Ms Coulter right? Any...ahem, reasons for that...just found it humorous.

Last edited by Artman; 12-08-07 at 11:26 AM.
Old 12-08-07 | 11:29 AM
  #199  
Jason Bovberg's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer Emeritus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,644
Received 189 Likes on 114 Posts
From: Fort Collins, CO
Originally Posted by Kerborus
Well what's behind this post? Insecurity?

Does making the film more successful help your self esteem because in some weird way it champions your views?

Sheesh...
I don't think you even read what I wrote. The movie's success or failure doesn't matter much to me, although I would like to see further films of the books, which I'm enjoying. I just hope they're satisfying movies. What does matter to me is when fear-motivated busybodies get in my face.

The thread title is meant to be ironic.
Old 12-08-07 | 01:50 PM
  #200  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 30,012
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Madison, WI ("77 square miles surrounded by reality")
According to Variety, $8.6 million box office Friday. Not very impressive. May be premature but I'd say the sequels are in jeopardy.

Edit: Box Office Mojo says 8.8 million. Enchanted is second at $2.9 million. The Golden Compass didn't even have any competition from other wide releases this weekend. Looks terrible.

Last edited by movielib; 12-08-07 at 02:53 PM.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.