Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Different actors, same character - Sequel related

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Different actors, same character - Sequel related

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-07, 03:06 PM
  #26  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Nick Danger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 30,682
Received 1,484 Likes on 943 Posts
And Dracula (Bela Lugosi and Christopher Lee), and Frankenstein.
Old 02-04-07, 05:01 PM
  #27  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,988
Likes: 0
Received 256 Likes on 179 Posts
Felix Leiter
Old 02-04-07, 06:27 PM
  #28  
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The dad in The Man From Snowy River was played by Kirk Douglas, and then they put in Brian Dennehy as the dad in Return to Snowy River. It definitely bugged me!
Old 02-04-07, 06:52 PM
  #29  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rw2516
Felix Leiter
Yep. Nine movies and 8 actors.
Old 02-04-07, 06:58 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Therer were 3 different actors who played Charlie Chan I think.
Old 02-04-07, 07:49 PM
  #31  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,414
Likes: 0
Received 238 Likes on 142 Posts
Eugene Jerome in the Neil Simon movies (Brighton Beach Memoirs and Biloxi Blues) was played by Jonathan Silverman and then Matthew Broderick.
Old 02-04-07, 08:16 PM
  #32  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 23,936
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Didn't the Fire guy in Xmen change?

And Dumbledore in Harry Potter.
Old 02-04-07, 08:43 PM
  #33  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
tanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Gator Nation
Posts: 9,983
Received 971 Likes on 678 Posts
Originally Posted by emachine12
Aladdin (Walt Disney)
Robin Williams -> Dan Castellaneta -> Robin Williams -> Dan Castellaneta = Genie
[Disney made Willaims mad before the second sequel so he refused to participate. After a long making up session, Willaims returns for the third film. For the TV show sequel, Disney went back to Castellaneta.]

I thought it was just a money issue.
Old 02-04-07, 10:04 PM
  #34  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,134
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
Robin Williams accepted union scale for Aladdin (1992) on the terms that his voice not be used for merchandising and that the Genie character only occupy 25% or less of marketing products. The Walt Disney Company reneged on this (obviously, since the Genie would be the most popular character), so Williams' refused to return for Aladdin: The Return of Jafar. Michael Eisner attempted to "make good" to Robin Williams with both a public apology and gift which was refused. When Jeffrey Katzenberg was fired and the new producer apologized for the errors; Williams' returned to the franchise with Aladdin: The King of Thieves. Interestingly enough, Dan Castellaneta did record dialogue for the third film which was shelved and replaced by Williams.
Old 02-04-07, 10:38 PM
  #35  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Lincolnwood, Illinois
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Surprised no one said Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader, granted there's the age issue, but it's still pretty frakked up when you think about it.

Ep. I - Jake Lloyd
Ep. II-III - Hayden Christensen
Ep. IV-VI - David Prowse for body movements, James Earl Jones as the voice, Sebastian Shaw playing unmasked Vader, and then back to Hayden Christensen as a Jedi spirit (only ROTJ current edition).
Old 02-05-07, 02:03 AM
  #36  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
mrhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,177
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by GuruTwo
Yeah but "The Silence of the Lambs" was never intended to be a cinematic followup to "Manhunter". They certainly downplayed the connection (IE: they didn't want to associate their high-profile movie with an obscure flop) and there's no evidence they ever even considered recasting Brian Cox. As it stands "Manhunter" and "The Silence of the Lambs" are no more "related" than, say, any two random Sherlock Holmes adaptations. The books upon which they are based are related but as cinematic entities they are not.
So why did they remake it? They even used the same DP that worked on Manhunter. Even with the different ending it basically was a remake of Manhunter except they used the original title.
Old 02-05-07, 03:19 AM
  #37  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,444
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
In Arthur, the character of Susan Johnson (the woman that
Arthur was supposed to marry) was played by Jill Eikenberry,
but in the sequel, the character was played by Cynthia Sikes.

Rob
Old 02-05-07, 03:25 AM
  #38  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So why did they remake it? They even used the same DP that worked on Manhunter. Even with the different ending it basically was a remake of Manhunter except they used the original title.
"Red Dragon" is a second adaptation of the novel "Red Dragon", not a remake of "Manhunter".

Ratner used Spinotti because he had worked with him before on "The Family Man" and he subsequently worked with Spinotti on "After the Sunset" and "X-Men: The Last Stand". There was definitely a level of "hey, he worked on the other one so he's a good choice" but by now it's obvious that Ratner just likes working with him.

The reason they "remade" it was BECAUSE "Manhunter" isn't connected to "The Silence of the Lambs" cinematically and now there's a version of it that features most of the same cast (the original actors appeared as three of the four recurring characters from "Silence") and a visual style, production design (courtesy of "Silence" production designer Kristi Zea) etc.

Basically all the similarities can be attributed to the fact that they both adapted the same source material. I've watched all 4 Lecter films within the past week and even with Dante Spinotti working on both "Manhunter" and "Red Dragon" the visual similarities are pretty minimal. Ratner obviously (and wisely) knew that it would be better to ape Jonathan Demme than Michael Mann and there are instances of the Demme trademark "staring into the camera closeup" from "Silence" but none of the awkward editing and dated visuals of "Manhunter".

But the Bond movies are a series. If you want to call them sequels, then the Sherlock Holmes and Tarzan movies count too.
No no no no no, the Bond movie is more of a series than lumping in the hundreds of Sherlock Holmes, Dracula and Tarzan movies because unlike those cases the 21 Bond films collectively considered "official" were all made by the same legal entity: EON productions.

Furthermore, there IS continuity in the first 20 of those films. There is something akin to comic book aging at play where the Bond character doesn't age while current time progresses but aside from the aforementioned Blofeld continuity error between "You Only Live Twice" and "On Her Majesty's Secret Service" and a few small gaffes like Bond's inability to read Chinese in "Tomorrow Never Dies" (he claims to have studied Oriental languages in "You Only Live Twice") there are numerous attempts made throughout the series to continuously remind the audience that the Bond they're watching is the same one they've always watched.

Take the death of Tracy. It occurs in Lazenby's only film but it's implied in the subsequent film (starring Connery) and is later mentioned in films starring Moore, Dalton and Brosnan. You also have scenes in both "On Her Majesty's Secret Service" and "Die Another Day" when the current Bond actor (Lazenby and Brosnan, respectively) show familiarity with gadgets used in previous films regardless of the actor playing them.

As for "Casino Royale", it may feature a rebooted and different version of the character in the previous 20 films, EON Productions does consider it "Bond 21" and continues to use that numbering when producing new Bond films, for example the upcoming Bond film is "Bond 22" until it's officially titled.

But yeah, if you're going to compare the Bond series to Holmes, Dracula and Tarzan you have to acknowledge the different series within the larger parameters of all films featuring that character. The Bonds featured in the TV version of "Casino Royale", the spoof version and "Never Say Never Again" are all different than the Bond(s) of the EON films but that's not to say that it's an appropriate comparison.

When it comes to Bond, there are 23 films plus a TV episode and 21 of those are considered part of the same series. When it comes to Lecter there are 5 films, four of which are part of the same series (I'm counting "Hannibal Rising" as part of the Hopkins series since Gaspard Ulliel based his performance on Hopkins), there are 7 theatrical Batman films in four different series, etc.
Old 02-05-07, 08:21 AM
  #39  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Giantrobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,373
Received 1,854 Likes on 1,147 Posts
Originally Posted by Simpson Purist
Surprised no one said Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader, granted there's the age issue, but it's still pretty frakked up when you think about it.


Ep. IV-VI - David Prowse for body movements, James Earl Jones as the voice, Sebastian Shaw playing unmasked Vader, and then back to Hayden Christensen as a Jedi spirit (only ROTJ current edition).
I'm not sure all of this counts. Perhaps the replacement of "Spirit Shaw" with "Spirit Hayden" but that's it.
Old 02-05-07, 01:32 PM
  #40  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
mrhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,177
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by GuruTwo
"Red Dragon" is a second adaptation of the novel "Red Dragon", not a remake of "Manhunter".

Ratner used Spinotti because he had worked with him before on "The Family Man" and he subsequently worked with Spinotti on "After the Sunset" and "X-Men: The Last Stand". There was definitely a level of "hey, he worked on the other one so he's a good choice" but by now it's obvious that Ratner just likes working with him.

The reason they "remade" it was BECAUSE "Manhunter" isn't connected to "The Silence of the Lambs" cinematically and now there's a version of it that features most of the same cast (the original actors appeared as three of the four recurring characters from "Silence") and a visual style, production design (courtesy of "Silence" production designer Kristi Zea) etc.

Basically all the similarities can be attributed to the fact that they both adapted the same source material. I've watched all 4 Lecter films within the past week and even with Dante Spinotti working on both "Manhunter" and "Red Dragon" the visual similarities are pretty minimal. Ratner obviously (and wisely) knew that it would be better to ape Jonathan Demme than Michael Mann and there are instances of the Demme trademark "staring into the camera closeup" from "Silence" but none of the awkward editing and dated visuals of "Manhunter".

No matter how you "slice" it; Mann is leagues ahead of Rattner as a director and to most it's basically the same movie.
Old 02-05-07, 02:09 PM
  #41  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No matter how you "slice" it; Mann is leagues ahead of Rattner as a director and to most it's basically the same movie.
No matter how you "slice" it; "Manhunter" is a schlocky b-movie that Mann crapped out on his "Miami Vice" hiatus and it would have faded into obscurity if it wasn't for Jonathan Demme taking similar source material and doing it right, and even if you can't respect Ratner for doing no more than avoiding Mann's mistakes and aping Demme's successes you can still look at his film and appreciate that it's better than Mann's in every single way.
Old 02-05-07, 04:22 PM
  #42  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 6,287
Received 231 Likes on 159 Posts
Rocky Jr. (III, IV & V)
Old 02-05-07, 04:42 PM
  #43  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,381
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by candyrocket786
Rocky Jr. (III, IV & V)

More like: Rocky Jr: II, III, IV, V, and VI


How about: Wesley Snipes -----> Omar Epps in Major League I and II
Old 02-05-07, 05:03 PM
  #44  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 6,287
Received 231 Likes on 159 Posts
Guyver, Guyver II: Dark Hero
TMNT I, II III (April O'neil/Voice Actors)
X-Men Films (Kitty Pride, Pyro, Jubilee)
Old 02-05-07, 05:41 PM
  #45  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Giantrobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,373
Received 1,854 Likes on 1,147 Posts
Originally Posted by candyrocket786
TMNT I, II III (April O'neil/Voice Actors)
Superman in Superman:TAS is a different actor than the one in Justice League/JLU

I know it's not a sequel or movie but since they used Kevin C. to voice Batman in more than one series I think it should get a honorable mention.
Old 02-05-07, 05:41 PM
  #46  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,381
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
How about:

Michael Brody: Jaws --> Jaws 2 --> Jaws 3-D (Dennis Quaid) --> Jaws the Revenge (Lance Guest)

and

Sean Brody. same deal-yo, daddy-o.
Old 02-05-07, 05:49 PM
  #47  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
mrhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,177
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by GuruTwo
No matter how you "slice" it; "Manhunter" is a schlocky b-movie that Mann crapped out on his "Miami Vice" hiatus and it would have faded into obscurity if it wasn't for Jonathan Demme taking similar source material and doing it right, and even if you can't respect Ratner for doing no more than avoiding Mann's mistakes and aping Demme's successes you can still look at his film and appreciate that it's better than Mann's in every single way.
I saw Manhunter when it was first released and it was good in it's time; obviously time wasn't good to it. Bottom line: Ratner is a hack and Mann will always be the better director.
Old 02-05-07, 10:49 PM
  #48  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree that Mann is a better director but I still think "Red Dragon" is the better film. It's simply a case of comparing one of Mann's worst films with Ratner's best.
Old 02-06-07, 09:56 AM
  #49  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 6,287
Received 231 Likes on 159 Posts
Originally Posted by Giantrobo
Superman in Superman:TAS is a different actor than the one in Justice League/JLU

I know it's not a sequel or movie but since they used Kevin C. to voice Batman in more than one series I think it should get a honorable mention.
Yep...

Tim Daly voiced Supes during the three seasons of STAS and that crappy Brainiac movie.

George Newburn voiced Supes during JL/JLU
Old 02-06-07, 01:34 PM
  #50  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
mrhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,177
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Well, the one that went over my head when I was a little kid watching reruns of Bewitched was the Dick York/ Dick Sargent switch. They looked exactly the same.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.