Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

A Movie that Could Really use a CGI Make Over

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

A Movie that Could Really use a CGI Make Over

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-03-06 | 12:34 AM
  #26  
Mondo Kane's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 11,984
Received 256 Likes on 205 Posts
Originally Posted by SINGLE104
Clash of the Titans is perfect just the way it is,
There's definetly some stuff that's held up like The Kraken and Bubo. But man, I've ALWAYS wanted to see a mechanical Medusa. And (Like I pointed out above with Davy Jones) there's proof that wonders could be fulfilled with a half/CG Medusa.
Old 09-03-06 | 03:33 AM
  #27  
Giantrobo's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 65,284
Received 2,698 Likes on 1,599 Posts
From: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Originally Posted by SINGLE104
What Filmmaker has insinuated above, this would drastically ruin the film's original cinematography of it's era.

Sure, maybe for SOME movies. But again, I said "RECENT" G-films. No need to go and oppose all the -OPINIONS- in this thread SINGLE104 .

Last edited by Giantrobo; 09-03-06 at 03:38 AM.
Old 09-03-06 | 07:57 AM
  #28  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 30,012
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Madison, WI ("77 square miles surrounded by reality")
Originally Posted by natevines
I disagree. It would make it a different film if it had good, believable CGI. This and TRON I appreciate for their old school, '80s CGI. Makes me so nostalgic!
I totally agree with you. Those effects are a big part of their charm. I wouldn't change a pixel.
Old 09-03-06 | 09:37 AM
  #29  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Right now, my location is DVDTalk, but then again, you should already know that, shouldn't you?
Originally Posted by BrentLumkin


I can't decide if I'd like to see that be done a bit better, or if I love it as it is just because of how crazy it looks.
Mogwai body mechanics aside, I'd have the shot redone to not take place in broad daylight (major plot snafu there, he he)!

I've been thinking seriously about this question and think I've finally found the perfect answer--a film that should possess state-of-the-art special effects but, even upon release, was derided for having bargain-basement-level effects, under par for what had been on display in the series prior and after. That film is...







Old 09-03-06 | 10:24 AM
  #30  
Giantrobo's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 65,284
Received 2,698 Likes on 1,599 Posts
From: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
But but but...that was part of the charm. It brought back a Nostalgic feeling for the 60's.


I think if ALL cgi was done well then we wouldn't be having these constant bullshit CGI sucks/Old sfx rule debates. As it is, people see the worst examples and they get soured on just about all CGI.
Old 09-03-06 | 03:46 PM
  #31  
Shazam's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,027
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Canuckistan
Ghostbusters just needs some matte line cleanup.
Old 09-03-06 | 06:04 PM
  #32  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
?!? The SFX in Gremlins are awesome! Obviously not as good as in Gremlins 2: The New Batch, but still very good.
You've got to be kidding me. The effects look dated and very unrealistic by todays standards.
Old 09-03-06 | 06:24 PM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Squirrel God
You've got to be kidding me. The effects look dated and very unrealistic by todays standards.
That's to be expected. You must realize, Gremlins is twenty two years old.
Old 09-03-06 | 06:48 PM
  #34  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Right now, my location is DVDTalk, but then again, you should already know that, shouldn't you?
Originally Posted by Squirrel God
You've got to be kidding me. The effects look dated and very unrealistic by todays standards.
Disagreed.
Old 09-03-06 | 07:25 PM
  #35  
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zombiezilla
I will hunt down and make very sorry anyone who dares lay a finger on ANY Harryhausen effects with the intent to "upgrade" them with CGI.
Ditto! Ray Harryhausen is da man!
Old 09-03-06 | 07:43 PM
  #36  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SINGLE104
That's to be expected. You must realize, Gremlins is twenty two years old.
The title of this thread is:

"A Movie that Could Really use a CGI Make Over".

So what are you arguing? That because it's 22 years old it is beyond repair?
Old 09-03-06 | 10:56 PM
  #37  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Squirrel God
The title of this thread is:

"A Movie that Could Really use a CGI Make Over".

So what are you arguing? That because it's 22 years old it is beyond repair?
Who's arguing Squirrel God? I was just making a comment. And how can a movie be repaired? I think you mean: remake.
Old 09-03-06 | 11:19 PM
  #38  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Originally Posted by Squirrel God
You've got to be kidding me. The effects look dated and very unrealistic by todays standards.
I completely disagree. I can easily watch Gremlins without thinking about the special effects looking fake. Actually, the only scene in the entirety of Gremlins that could be redone is the scene where the Gremlins storm the movie screen, as they're clearly using cell animation. And while it looks cool, it's completely out of place.
Old 09-04-06 | 06:14 AM
  #39  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SINGLE104
Who's arguing Squirrel God? I was just making a comment. And how can a movie be repaired? I think you mean: remake.
I think you shouldn't have ducked when the joke was approaching your head.


Originally Posted by Suprmallet
I completely disagree. I can easily watch Gremlins without thinking about the special effects looking fake. Actually, the only scene in the entirety of Gremlins that could be redone is the scene where the Gremlins storm the movie screen, as they're clearly using cell animation. And while it looks cool, it's completely out of place.
While it's responsible for giving them character, the Mogwais all look too much like puppets rather than real creatures and I just can't get that out of my head when watching the film. It prevents me suspending my disbelief.
Old 09-04-06 | 07:43 AM
  #40  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Right now, my location is DVDTalk, but then again, you should already know that, shouldn't you?
Originally Posted by Squirrel God
While it's responsible for giving them character, the Mogwais all look too much like puppets rather than real creatures
The ratio of films that have successfully used CGI to make creatures look real is woefully tiny...
Old 09-04-06 | 10:08 AM
  #41  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Squirrel God
While it's responsible for giving them character, the Mogwais all look too much like puppets rather than real creatures and I just can't get that out of my head when watching the film. It prevents me suspending my disbelief.
Actually, the Mogwais was not real creatures at all, they were a pleasant, gentle and a unique pet. The Gremlins were the creatures after their manifestation from the Mogwais, when the three forbidden rules were accidently broken.

Last edited by SINGLE104; 09-04-06 at 10:11 AM.
Old 09-04-06 | 10:39 AM
  #42  
Nick Danger's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 32,933
Received 2,374 Likes on 1,475 Posts
From: Albuquerque
Muppets in Space. It looks like a bunch of puppets. They really need to be replaced with modern CGI, like Yoda was.
Old 09-04-06 | 10:45 AM
  #43  
Giantrobo's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 65,284
Received 2,698 Likes on 1,599 Posts
From: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Originally Posted by Filmmaker
The ratio of films that have successfully used CGI to make creatures look real is woefully tiny...
Yeah like I said, that's the problem. If it was all done well then it would be a different story.
Old 09-04-06 | 10:59 AM
  #44  
Drexl's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 16,077
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
From: St. Louis, MO
"CGI Makeover" would be an interesting reality show.
Old 09-04-06 | 01:51 PM
  #45  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 39,565
Received 1,658 Likes on 1,176 Posts
From: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Originally Posted by Giantrobo
Sure, maybe for SOME movies. But again, I said "RECENT" G-films. No need to go and oppose all the -OPINIONS- in this thread SINGLE104 .
I dunno.. I kinda chuckled and was surprised how well the digital Godzilla 2000 looked in Final Wars.
Old 09-04-06 | 01:55 PM
  #46  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23,936
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: MN
The early Harry Potter movies could use some touching up.
Old 09-04-06 | 04:26 PM
  #47  
TGM's Avatar
TGM
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,093
Received 474 Likes on 295 Posts
From: Massachusetts
Dreamscape ... great premise, lousy F/X
Old 09-04-06 | 05:46 PM
  #48  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spawn
Old 09-04-06 | 06:23 PM
  #49  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Originally Posted by Nick Danger
Muppets in Space. It looks like a bunch of puppets. They really need to be replaced with modern CGI, like Yoda was.


Did no one else pick this up?
Old 09-04-06 | 07:08 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 755
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by Giantrobo
The most recent Godzilla movies had some cgi but a lot of it was crappy looking and could use an overhaul. You would think the the Japanese would be ahead of the pack with CGI but I guess not.
It's really more about budget and production time, not technical know-how. These movies are produced for the Japanese market first and foremost, and the potential box office could never justify an $80mil+ budget. Yoshimitsu Banno's production company has been trying to raise $30mil for it's 3D IMAX Godzilla movie. If this approximately 40 minute movie ever gets made, it will be the second most expensive movie with the name Godzilla in the title ever made (behind that 1998 debacle). And third place is a distant third. As for production time, these movies typically start shooting in the Spring and are released in the winter of the same year. Not much time for rendering photo-real level effects.

I wouldn't want Toho to abandon their traditional methods of miniatures and suitmation (I believe you feel the same way Giantrobo), but I have no problem with them blending in a little CG neither. Whatever works for the scene at hand. So far, I think 2002's Godzilla Against Mechagodzilla mixed in CG the most effectively and appropriately.

Originally Posted by devilshalo
I kinda chuckled and was surprised how well the digital Godzilla 2000 looked in Final Wars.
I'm trying to recall when Godzilla was not man-in-suit in that movie....


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.