![]() |
Originally Posted by SINGLE104
Clash of the Titans is perfect just the way it is,
|
Originally Posted by SINGLE104
What Filmmaker has insinuated above, this would drastically ruin the film's original cinematography of it's era.
Sure, maybe for SOME movies. But again, I said <b>"RECENT"</b> G-films. No need to go and oppose all the -OPINIONS- in this thread SINGLE104 . ;) |
Originally Posted by natevines
I disagree. It would make it a different film if it had good, believable CGI. This and TRON I appreciate for their old school, '80s CGI. Makes me so nostalgic!
|
Originally Posted by BrentLumkin
http://content.ytmnd.com/content/2/8...2aece71558.gif
I can't decide if I'd like to see that be done a bit better, or if I love it as it is just because of how crazy it looks. :lol: I've been thinking seriously about this question and think I've finally found the perfect answer--a film that should possess state-of-the-art special effects but, even upon release, was derided for having bargain-basement-level effects, under par for what had been on display in the series prior and after. That film is... http://services.tos.net/pics/st5/st5-shuttle.gif http://www.trekconnection.com/pictur...2002230051.jpg http://www.trekconnection.com/pictur...2002230911.jpg http://www.film-music.it/score/headers/startrekV.jpg |
But but but...that was part of the charm. It brought back a Nostalgic feeling for the 60's. :lol::p
I think if ALL cgi was done well then we wouldn't be having these constant bullshit CGI sucks/Old sfx rule debates. As it is, people see the worst examples and they get soured on just about all CGI. |
Ghostbusters just needs some matte line cleanup.
|
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
?!? The SFX in Gremlins are awesome! Obviously not as good as in Gremlins 2: The New Batch, but still very good.
|
Originally Posted by Squirrel God
You've got to be kidding me. The effects look dated and very unrealistic by todays standards.
|
Originally Posted by Squirrel God
You've got to be kidding me. The effects look dated and very unrealistic by todays standards.
|
Originally Posted by zombiezilla
I will hunt down and make very sorry anyone who dares lay a finger on ANY Harryhausen effects with the intent to "upgrade" them with CGI.
|
Originally Posted by SINGLE104
That's to be expected. You must realize, Gremlins is twenty two years old.
"A Movie that Could Really use a CGI Make Over". So what are you arguing? That because it's 22 years old it is beyond repair? :lol: |
Originally Posted by Squirrel God
The title of this thread is:
"A Movie that Could Really use a CGI Make Over". So what are you arguing? That because it's 22 years old it is beyond repair? :lol: |
Originally Posted by Squirrel God
You've got to be kidding me. The effects look dated and very unrealistic by todays standards.
|
Originally Posted by SINGLE104
:lol: Who's arguing Squirrel God? I was just making a comment. And how can a movie be repaired? I think you mean: remake.
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
I completely disagree. I can easily watch Gremlins without thinking about the special effects looking fake. Actually, the only scene in the entirety of Gremlins that could be redone is the scene where the Gremlins storm the movie screen, as they're clearly using cell animation. And while it looks cool, it's completely out of place.
|
Originally Posted by Squirrel God
While it's responsible for giving them character, the Mogwais all look too much like puppets rather than real creatures
|
Originally Posted by Squirrel God
While it's responsible for giving them character, the Mogwais all look too much like puppets rather than real creatures and I just can't get that out of my head when watching the film. It prevents me suspending my disbelief.
|
Muppets in Space. It looks like a bunch of puppets. They really need to be replaced with modern CGI, like Yoda was.
|
Originally Posted by Filmmaker
The ratio of films that have successfully used CGI to make creatures look real is woefully tiny...
|
"CGI Makeover" would be an interesting reality show.
|
Originally Posted by Giantrobo
Sure, maybe for SOME movies. But again, I said <b>"RECENT"</b> G-films. No need to go and oppose all the -OPINIONS- in this thread SINGLE104 . ;)
|
The early Harry Potter movies could use some touching up.
|
Dreamscape ... great premise, lousy F/X
|
Spawn
|
Originally Posted by Nick Danger
Muppets in Space. It looks like a bunch of puppets. They really need to be replaced with modern CGI, like Yoda was.
Did no one else pick this up? |
Originally Posted by Giantrobo
The most recent Godzilla movies had some cgi but a lot of it was crappy looking and could use an overhaul. You would think the the Japanese would be ahead of the pack with CGI but I guess not.
I wouldn't want Toho to abandon their traditional methods of miniatures and suitmation (I believe you feel the same way Giantrobo), but I have no problem with them blending in a little CG neither. Whatever works for the scene at hand. So far, I think 2002's Godzilla Against Mechagodzilla mixed in CG the most effectively and appropriately.
Originally Posted by devilshalo
I kinda chuckled and was surprised how well the digital Godzilla 2000 looked in Final Wars.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.