Weekend Box Office 2/10 - 2/12
#26
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RichC2
While subjective to your opinion on what you'd consider "decent" or not, What Lies Beneath was a decent sized hit ($155m domestic, $291m Worldwide), though I have no idea its huge budget went. Air Force One made $173m domestic and about $315m worldwide.
So 6 years since a hit, but still way above the Sly Stallone draw.
So 6 years since a hit, but still way above the Sly Stallone draw.
Hey at least we got to see the new Chrysler 300
#27
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RichC2
While subjective to your opinion on what you'd consider "decent" or not, What Lies Beneath was a decent sized hit ($155m domestic, $291m Worldwide), though I have no idea its huge budget went. Air Force One made $173m domestic and about $315m worldwide.
So 6 years since a hit, but still way above the Sly Stallone draw.
So 6 years since a hit, but still way above the Sly Stallone draw.
Hey at least we got to see the new Chrysler 300
Chrysler 300>this movie
#28
Originally Posted by animalmystic
Hey at least we got to see the new Chrysler 300
Looking forward to FD3 this week sometime as the 24" of snow surely kept me inside.
#30
Originally Posted by grim_tales
Don't see Kong making any more money. $215m (Domestic) and $530m-ish (World) is all it will do. Narnia has kicked its ass.
Narnia had the same built-in Christian audience that The Passion did, which no doubt helped boost its take. Not to mention it was extremely kid friendly and had a greater appeal to family audiences.
This is a film that will stand the test of time, regardless of how much money you think it should have earned.
#32
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by Artman
Anyone know the reason for the surge in Tuesday's grosses?
#35
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Leandro/San Francisco
Posts: 7,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
Narnia had the same built-in Christian audience that The Passion did, which no doubt helped boost its take. Not to mention it was extremely kid friendly and had a greater appeal to family audiences.
This is a film that will stand the test of time, regardless of how much money you think it should have earned.
Kong is a much better movie though in my opinion.
Glad B.B is still doing well.
#36
Originally Posted by riley_dude
Exactly. So many people trying to say that Kong failed and Narnia kicked it's ass. Sure it did better but it was a kiddie movie and it was shorter than Kong plus all the Christians flocked to see it.
Oh, and I get sick of this claim that Narnia's numbers are just because of "the Christains." That's just crap, but even if it was true, does it matter? It's not like Christain box office dollars don't count the same as everyone elses.
Originally Posted by Seantn
It was Valentine's Day. People take their dates to see scary movies. Makes sense.
#38
Originally Posted by riley_dude
Narnia wasnt a a Hype machine? It was everywhere!
I am not trying to insult King Kong mind you, I am just saying that the expectations game hurts how it is perceived, regardless of how good the movie actually is. I do personally prefer Narnia, but I liked Kong too.
Last edited by onebyone; 02-16-06 at 06:56 PM.