Gene Hackman vs. Dustin Hoffman
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gene Hackman vs. Dustin Hoffman
OK...following the DeNiro vs. Pacino thread i'll throw this one in: who is a better actor: Gene Hackman or Dustin Hoffman...kind of tough since they're both different style actors, i don't think Gene has ever really put in a bad performance, he's great even in fluff like Enemy of the State, his pinnacle (for me) The Conversation or the French Connection....as for Hoffman, he's more of a character actor, Midnight Cowboy, Straw Dogs, The Graduate...the list goes on. I have to give it to Dustin (he tranforms himself to every role). Have they ever been in a movie together? I think they have i can't remember though
#2
DVD Talk Legend
Yes they were in one movie together.'The Runaway Jury' and in my opinion Hackman gave the better performance.
As you say, overall different types of actors, but I'll take Hackman any day.
I've never seen Hackman 'grandstand' in a drama. He just exists within the framework.
I think Hoffman's best work is far behind him, great as it was (Little Big Man, Graduate, Midnight Cowboy, Rainman, SD's etc).
As you say, overall different types of actors, but I'll take Hackman any day.
I've never seen Hackman 'grandstand' in a drama. He just exists within the framework.
I think Hoffman's best work is far behind him, great as it was (Little Big Man, Graduate, Midnight Cowboy, Rainman, SD's etc).
#3
DVD Talk Limited Edition
They were in Runaway Jury together, and they actually were roommates back in the 60's while they were both trying to get work. According to their IMDB pages, they were both vote Least Likely to Suceed in their class.
#6
DVD Talk Legend
Please... Hackman easily. I don't think I've liked any of Hoffman's performances (and most movies as well), his persona just doesn't do it for me I guess.
#7
Senior Member
I pick Hoffman. He was much more versatile, playing so many different types of characters (sometimes unrecognizable). Hackman is great, but it seems like he has the exact same personality in most of his characters.
#8
DVD Talk Gold Edition
The only reason I need to place my vote for Gene Hackman is because of his role from Young Frankenstein.
"Wait. Where are you going? I was going to make Espresso!"
"Wait. Where are you going? I was going to make Espresso!"
#10
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think they're both great, but Hackman is ALWAYS watchable, no matter how bad the film is. I can't say the same for Hoffman. Hackman also handles David Mamet dialogue a lot better than Hoffman.
So I vote Hackman.
So I vote Hackman.
#11
Yeah, I'm going with Hackman, too. The guy is just easy to watch on screen.
The French Connection, Hoosiers, Crimson Tide, Get Shorty, Unforgiven, Superman I & II, The Poseidon Adventure....mmm mmm good.
The French Connection, Hoosiers, Crimson Tide, Get Shorty, Unforgiven, Superman I & II, The Poseidon Adventure....mmm mmm good.
#13
DVD Talk Limited Edition
I think critically, Hoffman is the better actor. But, I prefer Hackman.
"Otisburg?!"
"Otisburg?!"
#14
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by Cartload
The only reason I need to place my vote for Gene Hackman is because of his role from Young Frankenstein.
"Wait. Where are you going? I was going to make Espresso!"
"Wait. Where are you going? I was going to make Espresso!"
#15
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Artman
Please... Hackman easily. I don't think I've liked any of Hoffman's performances (and most movies as well), his persona just doesn't do it for me I guess.
#18
DVD Talk Legend
I think Hoffman was a phenomenal actor in his earlier roles. So if you just judge his work from before... say 1988, I would say he wins hands down. Now, like Pacino in my mind, he seems more of a characiture of himself. Considering the total body of work I would have to give the edge to Hackman.
#19
Banned
Originally Posted by DeputyDave
I think Hoffman was a phenomenal actor in his earlier roles. So if you just judge his work from before... say 1988, I would say he wins hands down. Now, like Pacino in my mind, he seems more of a characiture of himself. Considering the total body of work I would have to give the edge to Hackman.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Los Angeles and Amsterdam
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I used to work at a video store in Pacific Palisades in the late 80's, and one time two ladies came in and asked for recommendations, I recommended a few and two or three where Gene Hackman movies, one lady pulled me aside and whispered to me not to recommend any more Gene Hackman movies as the other lady was his ex wife and hated him. So whenever the ex wife would return to the store and asked, I made sure to recommend any Gene Hackman movie I could think of. I think she stopped asking for recommendation after the third time she came by.
I think Hackman is a great actor, but I don't think he's in the same league as Hoffman, Pacino, De Niro. I think it would be a better discussion as to the trio.
I think Hackman is a great actor, but I don't think he's in the same league as Hoffman, Pacino, De Niro. I think it would be a better discussion as to the trio.
Last edited by H8nXTC; 01-22-06 at 06:37 AM.
#23
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by SINGLE104
I don't think you know a good acting performance when you actually see one. Have you ever seen Dustin Hoffman performances in Rain Man, Kramer vs Kramer, Tootsie, Marathon Man? just to name a few.
Last edited by Artman; 01-22-06 at 09:55 PM.
#24
DVD Talk Legend
If I have to compare, I'd say Hoffman is better when it's a role where he's playing an out-there character with a complete transformation, like Rain Man, Tootsie, etc. For a more "normal" guy role, Hackman is better.