Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Ebert's 10 Best Lists: 1967-present....

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Ebert's 10 Best Lists: 1967-present....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-24-05 | 03:26 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,032
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ebert's 10 Best Lists: 1967-present....

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/.../41215001/1023
Old 12-24-05 | 03:41 AM
  #2  
PopcornTreeCt's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 25,913
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
The one that sticks out the most is "The Cell"

Wow, just wow.
Old 12-24-05 | 07:54 AM
  #3  
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: greenwood, in
he seems to contradict himself.... ET is #3 in the year it comes out, but #3 for the 80's?
pulp fiction #3 in it's year coming out, but #2 in the 90's?

Last edited by sixerb; 12-24-05 at 07:57 AM.
Old 12-24-05 | 09:16 AM
  #4  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: not CT
Originally Posted by sixerb
he seems to contradict himself.... ET is #3 in the year it comes out, but #3 for the 80's?
pulp fiction #3 in it's year coming out, but #2 in the 90's?
I'd hardly call that contradiction ... the effects of art on any one person change over time.
Old 12-24-05 | 09:54 AM
  #5  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,738
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by BigPete
I'd hardly call that contradiction ... the effects of art on any one person change over time.
I love DVDTalker marty888's sig for this:

"The movie never changes - it can't change - but every time you see it, it seems different because you're different - you see different things." - James Cole
Old 12-24-05 | 10:22 AM
  #6  
Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Asheville, NC
Reading this guy's lists just reminds me how much I miss Gene Siskel. I essentially can count on Roger Ebert's reviews by assuming the exact opposite of what he thinks. The amount of amazing movies he has dissed is staggering. Him ranking "The Cell" as a best of the year movie is not surprising, considering who it's coming from.
Old 12-24-05 | 10:40 AM
  #7  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 19,548
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Ferment
I really hate his lackey now. That guy agrees with everything Roger says, to the point of fawning all over him like a sex kitten to Hugh Hefner.

Gene had balls. Everytime Gene and Roger had a disagreement over some movie, Gene would always claim, "Yeah, but you wrote Beyond the Valley of the Dolls." in a "So what do YOU know" voice.
Old 12-24-05 | 12:00 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He didn't include The Sting in 1973, or Godfather, Part II in 1974. After that, the list lost any credibility to me.
Old 12-24-05 | 03:48 PM
  #9  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: A little bit here and a little bit there.
purple rain... that's funny.
Old 12-24-05 | 03:50 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: A little bit here and a little bit there.
a walk in the clouds...1995...even more funny.
Old 12-24-05 | 04:41 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,085
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Phoenix
Originally Posted by Al_Tahoe
He didn't include The Sting in 1973, or Godfather, Part II in 1974. After that, the list lost any credibility to me.
He only gave Godfather Part II three stars.
Old 12-24-05 | 04:50 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bethleham, New Jersey
Yeah, also Gene Siskel gave Babe: Pig in the City movie of the year in Gene's final top 10. I blame it on his tumor, though.
Old 12-24-05 | 05:24 PM
  #13  
New Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: miami
Originally Posted by A.D.D. for DVD
Reading this guy's lists just reminds me how much I miss Gene Siskel. I essentially can count on Roger Ebert's reviews by assuming the exact opposite of what he thinks. The amount of amazing movies he has dissed is staggering. Him ranking "The Cell" as a best of the year movie is not surprising, considering who it's coming from.
"The Cell" sucked, but I soley blame J Lo.
Old 12-24-05 | 05:34 PM
  #14  
Groucho's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 71,383
Received 130 Likes on 92 Posts
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Originally Posted by mllefoo
I really hate his lackey now. That guy agrees with everything Roger says, to the point of fawning all over him like a sex kitten to Hugh Hefner.
You must not watch the show. They argue all the time.
Old 12-24-05 | 05:38 PM
  #15  
McHawkson's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 14,752
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: America Empire
Originally Posted by drew777
"The Cell" sucked, but I soley blame J Lo.
The Cell sucked? I paid too close attention to JLo's butt.
Old 12-24-05 | 07:11 PM
  #16  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,085
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Phoenix
Originally Posted by ChrisKnudsen
Yeah, also Gene Siskel gave Babe: Pig in the City movie of the year in Gene's final top 10. I blame it on his tumor, though.
Babe: Pig in the City is a great film. Have you even seen it?
Old 12-24-05 | 08:39 PM
  #17  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NJ
The key to Ebert is that he's all for the eye candy, which may explain his love of the Cell. Heck, if you read his positive review for the Phantom of the Opera remake, he seems to say the movie's terrible but recommends it for the production design.
Old 12-25-05 | 07:58 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not many foreign movies in there, although i'm very pleasantly surprised to see Monsieur Hire at #2 in 1990, 2nd only to Goodfellas. I love it too and am astonished we still can't buy it on dvd.
Old 12-25-05 | 08:15 AM
  #19  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 20,188
Received 344 Likes on 220 Posts
From: behind the eight ball
Minority Report as #1 in 2002?
Old 12-25-05 | 10:24 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Buckeye State
Purple Rain
Old 12-25-05 | 10:35 AM
  #21  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 19,548
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Ferment
Originally Posted by Groucho
You must not watch the show. They argue all the time.
I stopped watching after the first five shows. It was revolting.
Old 12-25-05 | 11:30 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Vancouver, WA
No Shawshank Redemption at all.
Old 12-25-05 | 11:33 AM
  #23  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Dark City
He seems to really like Herzog. Me too.
Old 12-25-05 | 01:29 PM
  #24  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,058
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Portland, OR
Ah, I love the fashionable Ebert-bashing. It all boils down to "he doesn't like what I like!"
Old 12-25-05 | 06:46 PM
  #25  
Mr. Cinema's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 18,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'd hate to see what you guys would say about other critics' top 10 lists...especially from assclowns like Joel Siegel. His lists are like anyone elses. He doesn't make them to please you.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.