BATMAN BEGINS review thread...
#701
Suspended
Originally Posted by Imodium
I couldn't disagree with the sentiment that Batman appeared to late more.
If anything, I felt Batman should've appeared even later in the movie. The first half of the movie had a very "psychological thriller" aspect to it.
I'm not that crazy about superhero movies either, sans X2. Batman Begins, however, was one of the best movies I've seen in awhile. Amazing. Please god let Nolan and Goyer stay on board.
If anything, I felt Batman should've appeared even later in the movie. The first half of the movie had a very "psychological thriller" aspect to it.
I'm not that crazy about superhero movies either, sans X2. Batman Begins, however, was one of the best movies I've seen in awhile. Amazing. Please god let Nolan and Goyer stay on board.
In other words, perhaps if you don't like superhero movies and prefer psychological thrillers, Batman isn't the movie for you. I happen to like superhero movies and would be disappointed that I got something that was a psychological thriller.
As it is, though, I didn't think Batman was a psychological thriller so much as it was simply a bad superhero movie (for the reasons I laid out in my firts post, and I won't bore everyone with the details again).
#702
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Orlando, FL
Batman Begins is holding up very well at $172,000,000 after 4 weeks. It was #3 this past weekend with a more than $10,000,000 take. It's poised to break $200 million, I think. Warner Bros. cannot be unhappy with these numbers. Though if that marketing budget estimate is true . . .
#703
Originally Posted by RogueScribner
Batman Begins is holding up very well at $172,000,000 after 4 weeks. It was #3 this past weekend with a more than $10,000,000 take. It's poised to break $200 million, I think. Warner Bros. cannot be unhappy with these numbers. Though if that marketing budget estimate is true . . . 

#704
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by RogueScribner
Batman Begins is holding up very well at $172,000,000 after 4 weeks. It was #3 this past weekend with a more than $10,000,000 take. It's poised to break $200 million, I think. Warner Bros. cannot be unhappy with these numbers. Though if that marketing budget estimate is true . . . 

Nowadays, that is more important along with the eventual DVD sales.
#705
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NYC/NJ
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
How much is the worldwide take so far?
Nowadays, that is more important along with the eventual DVD sales.
Nowadays, that is more important along with the eventual DVD sales.
Last edited by Joe1086; 07-13-05 at 09:56 AM.
#707
It should squeak by the $200m domestic mark, if it doesn't shed too many theaters. Hopefully it's above average legs will keep that from happening. It's gonna be close. It just opened in most of the larger worlwide venues (UK, France, Australia, etc.) last week, so hopefully they will be able to lift it over the $400WW mark.
#708
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles
Saw it for the second time last night (takes me 2 times with most movies to have a full opinion on them) and LOVED it. Enjoyed it the first time as well, but the second time (knowing what to expect) I really enjoyed it. Definitely going to pick it up when it is released.
Great directing, acting, story. Katie Holmes didn't even piss me off as much the 2nd time
Great directing, acting, story. Katie Holmes didn't even piss me off as much the 2nd time
#709
Till July 24 : 191 Million domestic, 333 worldwide (worldwide is a it iffy, being updated very infrequently at boxofficemojo).
C'mon baby! 400 million worldwide - u can dooooo it
C'mon baby! 400 million worldwide - u can dooooo it
#710
DVD Talk Legend
I'm one of the few who just saw this yesterday for a matinee show. I expected a great movie from all the glowing reviews. Bad sadly, quite disappointed. Too dramatic. Took itself too seriously. BB wasn't a horrible movie by any stretch. I prefer the Marvel films I guess minus The Hulk. I preferred Tim Burton's version of Batman.
#711
DVD Talk Godfather
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 65,294
Received 2,699 Likes
on
1,600 Posts
From: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Originally Posted by big whoppa
Too dramatic. Took itself too seriously.
#712
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by big whoppa
I'm one of the few who just saw this yesterday for a matinee show. I expected a great movie from all the glowing reviews. Bad sadly, quite disappointed. Too dramatic. Took itself too seriously. BB wasn't a horrible movie by any stretch. I prefer the Marvel films I guess minus The Hulk. I preferred Tim Burton's version of Batman.
So, what to you is too serious and too dramatic regarding this film?
#713
Originally Posted by big whoppa
Too dramatic. Took itself too seriously.
#714
DVD Talk Hero
Yeah, as much as I love Ra's Al Ghul,
Scarecrow was the best part. Even though the sequels villains will be the Joker and Tw-Face, I hope we see a Scarecrow cameo in each sequel and perhaps Scarecrow as the main villain in a fourth film.
Spoiler:
#715
DVD Talk Legend
Finally got around to seeing it today, and it blew me away. I was avoiding it for months because I am not a big fan of Bale, but it was a great movie. The best comic book movie ever.
#716
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by RocShemp
Before anyone starts joking around, how much lighter would you have preffered it? I see you say that you preffer the Burton films but, although somewhat offbeat, those films had less a sense of fun than this film had. Not saying anything bad about Burton's films (I still enjoy them despite the fact that I've never really considered them Batman films but rather what Burton would have done had he created Batman instead of Bob Kane) but they were rather morbid compared to Batman Begins.
So, what to you is too serious and too dramatic regarding this film?
So, what to you is too serious and too dramatic regarding this film?
#718
Originally Posted by big whoppa
I'm one of the few who just saw this yesterday for a matinee show. I expected a great movie from all the glowing reviews. Bad sadly, quite disappointed. Too dramatic. Took itself too seriously. BB wasn't a horrible movie by any stretch. I prefer the Marvel films I guess minus The Hulk. I preferred Tim Burton's version of Batman.
Im actually the opposite. When I saw it (especially from the previews), I was expecting a darker movie.
I understand why it was kind of 'light' (since they wanted a PG13 movie for the kiddies), but I really wanted a darker more serious/mean character (I kind of wanted a movie with the atmosphere of The Crow).
#719
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Orlando, FL
BB is at the $200 million domestic gross mark, with more than $355 million worldwide. A decent take, no? That should ensure a sequel. I hope it also shuts up those naysayers who proclaimed BB a flop after it's first week.
#720
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Holmes returns for Batman sequel
Seems Katie Holmes hasn't got a pink slip from the "Batman" franchise at all - "Batman Begins" producer Charles Roven tells Sci Fi Wire that Holmes will be back for seconds, reprising her role as love interest Rachel Dawes in the sequel to the Summer hit.
Rumour had it that Holmes had been dropped from the film because the studio were unhappy that her and Tom Cruise were getting more attention than the film she was supposed to be out and about plugging. They were apparently looking to cast a "Stronger" actress in the sequel.
Roven says Holmes is back though, playing the assistant D.A who stole Bruce Wayne's heart by the final credits.
Also back, he confirms, is Michael Caine as the butler Alfred, Gary Oldman as police detective Jim Gordon, and of course, Christian Bale as Batman/Brucie boy.
"We're waiting for Chris Nolan to declare himself. We will do it after he does that", Nolan says.
MOVIEHOLE.net
Seems Katie Holmes hasn't got a pink slip from the "Batman" franchise at all - "Batman Begins" producer Charles Roven tells Sci Fi Wire that Holmes will be back for seconds, reprising her role as love interest Rachel Dawes in the sequel to the Summer hit.
Rumour had it that Holmes had been dropped from the film because the studio were unhappy that her and Tom Cruise were getting more attention than the film she was supposed to be out and about plugging. They were apparently looking to cast a "Stronger" actress in the sequel.
Roven says Holmes is back though, playing the assistant D.A who stole Bruce Wayne's heart by the final credits.
Also back, he confirms, is Michael Caine as the butler Alfred, Gary Oldman as police detective Jim Gordon, and of course, Christian Bale as Batman/Brucie boy.
"We're waiting for Chris Nolan to declare himself. We will do it after he does that", Nolan says.
MOVIEHOLE.net
#721
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by gerrythedon
"We're waiting for Chris Nolan to declare himself. We will do it after he does that", Nolan says.
#722
DVD Talk Godfather
Originally Posted by Joe Molotov
Did they mean to say "Rovan says" or was that Christopher Nolan referring to himself in the 3rd person? 

I caught that too. Good news about a sequel. I'm on the fence about Katie. She was just 'meh' for me. Not so bad to bring the movie down, but not good enough to walk amongst the rest of the cast either.
#723
DVD Talk Hero
I still see nothing about Morgan Freeman returning.
#724
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Joe Molotov
Here's a little something for long time readers of this thread. Batman Begins just crossed Pearl Harbor on the all-time Domestic chart.


That can't be right. I read on this forum that Pearl Harbor would make at least 400 million. I think you need to check your sources.
#725
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Woodbridge Va.
I just saw the new Batman and i have to say it was not very exciting at all. I was bored and as for the acting.....well lets just say the only person in the movie that was good was Gary Oldman. I could go on about what i didn't like about it but then again it's only my opinion. Some like it and some don't. I'm sorry to say i was bored. Ohh well maybe the next one will be better.



