Hey guys, just rented dracula 3000 .... looking at the cover the movie looked interesting.... having watched half and turning it off ... have to say one of the worst films i saw .... what you guys think????????????????????????????

dracula 2000 was better!!!!!!

BAD!!!

I will watch anything with Dracula in it and even I couldn't watch this......simply unbearable.

I assume this was a straight to video crapfest?

Dracula 2000: Great concept, poor execution.

Anyone see the sequal to Dracula 2000? It stared Jason scot Lee and the Jeremy London? It was actually pretty good. There was talk that a sequal was goignto be made. Was it Dracual 3000?

DRACULA 2000 has two sequels, DRACULA II and DRACULA III. The third entry in the series has been sitting on the shelf at Dimension for some time, but will be finally released on DVD this summer.

DRACULA 3000 is not related to this series.

I agree with anybody who says "it looks like they made up this movie as they went along".

(I still say its a better film than 'Ratcatcher')

Dracula 2000: Gerard Butler

Dracula 2000 was an average vampire film with an above average twist regarding the origins of Dracula. I was so impressed by this "Revelation" that I own the film, just for that.

As for Dracula II: Ascension, I'll say this:

If you can't get the same actor to play the LEAD role, leave it be. I was SO disappointed in that film. Hopefully III will be better, but I'm doubting it.

Here's a good rule of thumb: If it ends in a triple zero number (2000, 3000) it's bad. Bad, bad, bad.

Mystery Science Theater 3000?? Fantasia 2000?? Mr. 3000?

(whoops, you got me on that last one)

There are exceptions to every rule.

I remember watching The Phantom Of The Opera, and thought Butler would make a great Dracula, and the direction had a look and feel that would make a great Batman film.

Um...