Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Interesting MPAA rating

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Interesting MPAA rating

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-05, 01:11 AM
  #1  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Thread Starter
 
Joe Molotov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 8,507
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Interesting MPAA rating

From IMDB:

Film with 30 Uses of F-Word Gets PG-13 Rating
Apparently agreeing with producers that any young person old enough to be recruited by the military should be able to see what life in the military is all about (Edit: Uhhh...don't you have to be 18 to be in the military?), the MPAA has decided to allow the documentary Gunner Palace to open with a PG-13 rating, instead of an R. The film, about a group of U.S. soldiers living in a bombed-out palace that had once been owned by one of Saddam Hussein's sons, reportedly features more than 30 scenes in which the f-word is uttered. Although the MPAA has previously rejected demands to provide additional detailed information about its movie ratings, it did so for what may be the first time in the case of Gunner, noting specifically that the film uses "strong language not heard in previous PG-13-rated films." It added, "We want parents to take note of this important cautionary warning so they can better guide their children's movie viewing."
An interesting decision. Maybe next someone should try to make a war movie with 30 bare breasts and see what happens.

Last edited by Joe Molotov; 03-04-05 at 01:13 AM.
Old 03-04-05, 01:41 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Matthew Chmiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 13,262
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That's what I'm motherfucking talking about!

I read this news in Variety last week and I applaud the appeals board for giving it the PG-13. Seriously, children today are foul mouthed little punks. A PG-13 should be loaded to the brim with uses of "fuck," "shit," and "poop."

But in all seriousness, the film shows what situations are like when you're in the army. Sadly, in today's society, people start thinking about joining the army, navy, and the air force when they're in their early teens. Shouldn't teens be shown how the army really is and not some fabricated bullshit?
Old 03-04-05, 02:22 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Matthew Chmiel
Shouldn't teens be shown how the army really is and not some fabricated bullshit?
They should, but it's not the MPAA's responsibility to ensure this by completely disregarding their already questionable consistency on rating movies. Teens CAN see rated R movies--it just takes a parent or guardian who, if you think about it, ought to be with them to discuss the realities of military life anyway.

People have already been complaining about the MPAA's double standards; them playing parent and breaking their own generally understood rules about the relation between ratings and content has just made things worse.
Old 03-04-05, 02:28 AM
  #4  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how does the MPAA work.... i have wondered this.... do they sit around as a group and watch every single fucking movie and give it a rating if so i want that job hah
Old 03-04-05, 02:56 AM
  #5  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Matthew Chmiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 13,262
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
how does the MPAA work.... i have wondered this.... do they sit around as a group and watch every single fucking movie and give it a rating if so i want that job hah
When a film is first submitted for an MPAA rating, a group of "parents" that the MPAA hires end up watching the film. After watching it, they discuss the film amongst themselves and decide on the film's rating. In this case, when Gunner Palace first went to the MPAA, it got an R rating.

HOWEVER, when a film tries to appeal it's rating, the film is than submitted to the appeals board. This board consists of industry executives hired by the MPAA. They watch the film and decide if it should be given a lower rating. In this case, Gunner Palace secured it's PG-13.

Teens CAN see rated R movies--it just takes a parent or guardian who, if you think about it, ought to be with them to discuss the realities of military life anyway.
Contrary to popular belief, parents don't actually parent anymore. Most of the people I knew who wanted a military career were interested in it because....

A. They were too poor to go to college after high school.
B. They'd rather go into the military than go to college or go staight into the work force.
Old 03-04-05, 06:29 AM
  #6  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Michael Corvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 62,518
Received 913 Likes on 648 Posts
This is a non issue for a few reasons:

1. It is a documentary
2. It will probably only be in "art-house" type theaters
3. What teenager is going to go see a documentary?
Old 03-04-05, 07:56 AM
  #7  
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and to add more you dont have to be 18 to be in the military 17 and 1/2 with parent's signature.
Old 03-04-05, 07:58 AM
  #8  
Moderator
 
Groucho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 71,383
Received 122 Likes on 84 Posts
Originally Posted by Joe Molotov
An interesting decision. Maybe next someone should try to make a war movie with 30 bare breasts and see what happens.
Have you seen The Bounty? Bare boobies everywhere, and it got a PG. Presumably because it's "native" boobage.
Old 03-04-05, 08:16 AM
  #9  
Moderator
 
Giles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 33,630
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
yet language from a film like Billy Elliot still gets the R-rating, or even say the recent Academy Award documentary winner: Born into Brothels. The MPAA rating's board are hypocrites in my mind.
Old 03-04-05, 09:01 AM
  #10  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Rypro 525's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: a frikin hellhole
Posts: 28,264
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Giles
yet language from a film like Billy Elliot still gets the R-rating, or even say the recent Academy Award documentary winner: Born into Brothels. The MPAA rating's board are hypocrites in my mind.
or Merchant of Venance which has a 2 second boob shot and is rated R just for that, or Amadeus which also has a 2 second boob shot and is R as well. (well the dc is at least)
Old 03-04-05, 10:16 AM
  #11  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Thread Starter
 
Joe Molotov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 8,507
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Groucho
Have you seen The Bounty? Bare boobies everywhere, and it got a PG. Presumably because it's "native" boobage.
I haven't seen that, but I have seen White Dawn. Lots of Eskimo boobies in that movie.
Old 03-04-05, 10:25 AM
  #12  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 130,277
Received 616 Likes on 495 Posts
Originally Posted by Joe Molotov
An interesting decision. Maybe next someone should try to make a war movie with 30 bare breasts and see what happens.

Much like the FCC, no method to the madness.
Old 03-04-05, 10:49 AM
  #13  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To be fair, the actual recruitment process starts much earlier. Junior ROTC programs were always present at my high school, and many of those kids were freshmen. Yeah, they hadn't actually signed with the military, but they were being groomed to.

As for the rating, I think it's cool to see the MPAA taking context into consideration.
Old 03-04-05, 11:31 AM
  #14  
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rypro 525
or Merchant of Venance which has a 2 second boob shot and is rated R just for that, or Amadeus which also has a 2 second boob shot and is R as well. (well the dc is at least)

Oh, there's more nudity than that. Plus it deals with tightwad issues like homosexuality.


Originally Posted by Giles
yet language from a film like Billy Elliot still gets the R-rating, or even say the recent Academy Award documentary winner: Born into Brothels. The MPAA rating's board are hypocrites in my mind.
GUNNER PALACE was appealed because it represents the "truth" going on over there. Therefore, the MPAA gave it a free ride. If BILLY ELLIOT had been a non-fiction film, you could have an argument.
Old 03-04-05, 03:57 PM
  #15  
Moderator
 
Giles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 33,630
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
The MPAA are prudes.

In terms of the language of GUNNER PALACE - the word fuck and motherfucker are used numerous times:

"fuck" is utterred once as a sexual act - which has always been warranted an R-rating. The appeal board was apparently very lenient in giving this film a PG-13.
Old 03-04-05, 06:23 PM
  #16  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Shannon Nutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 18,362
Received 324 Likes on 242 Posts
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
This is a non issue for a few reasons:

1. It is a documentary
2. It will probably only be in "art-house" type theaters
3. What teenager is going to go see a documentary?
I find this interesting only because Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 got an "R" rating, with only a few "f" words in it. If Gunner Palace has a pro-war slant (I have no idea if it does or doesn't), I think the MPAA has some answering to do.
Old 03-04-05, 08:47 PM
  #17  
Moderator
 
Giles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 33,630
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
From my experience in seeing the film - I didn't get the sense it was a pro-war docu, I thought it fairly portrayed what soldiers have had to enact and endure during the Iraqi war.
Old 03-05-05, 11:26 AM
  #18  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Near the Great Salt Lake
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey, I'm a teenager who has seen quite a few documentaries, several of them in theaters... (Of course I'm pretty sure I don't represent the average teenager in my movie tastes.)

Anyways, this is a rather interesting incident - and is another reason, I believe, that we need a new ratings system here in the United States. Films such as "Fahrenheit 9/11" (which I'm admittedly not very fond of, though not necessarily for the politics) should not have the same rating as "Basic Instinct" or "Eyes Wide Shut."

Last edited by Sondheim; 03-05-05 at 02:52 PM.
Old 03-05-05, 12:20 PM
  #19  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
I find this interesting only because Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 got an "R" rating, with only a few "f" words in it. If Gunner Palace has a pro-war slant (I have no idea if it does or doesn't), I think the MPAA has some answering to do.
F9/11 (which I admittedly did really like) did feature some gruesome war images though such as dead bodies, torn apart limbs, etc. that could have warranted the R also. It remains to be seen what Gunner Palace has in it besides the language. It could just be a bunch of military buddies sitting around and talking for two hours.
Old 03-07-05, 11:20 AM
  #20  
Moderator
 
Giles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 33,630
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Fahrenheit 9-11 also had a public beheading in it - although it was shot from a very far distant and happens very fast. As for Gunner Palace the film is pretty much talking heads and features no violence (implied death, but no onscreen carnage).
Old 03-15-05, 04:56 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The MPAA is too outdated to work as it now stands. They need to change some of the guidelines. In this day and age, why try so hard to censor what 17 year olds see? If they can drive, work, and in some states voluntarily live on their own, they can't choose their own films??

I'm pleased that this recieved a PG-13 rating, at any rate. I like Matthew's point about the documentary being shown in a realistic light.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.