Peter Travers loses his mind...
#1
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Peter Travers loses his mind...
So I'm flipping through the new issue of Rolling Stone (#948) when I stumble upon Travers' top 10 movies for the coming summer:
1. Spider-Man 2
2. The Day After Tomorrow
3. The Terminal
4. Troy
5. Anchorman
6. Collateral
7. The Village
8. King Arthur
9. Catwoman
10. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
I'm just curious how much Warner Bros. paid Travers to put Catwoman on the list, or has he completely lost his mind?
Also, his movies to avoid: The Chronicles of Riddick, Around the World in 80 Days, The Notebook, and Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow. Sky Captain really doesn't belong on that list, I'd flip flop it with Catwoman.
Anyway, what does everyone else think?
1. Spider-Man 2
2. The Day After Tomorrow
3. The Terminal
4. Troy
5. Anchorman
6. Collateral
7. The Village
8. King Arthur
9. Catwoman
10. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
I'm just curious how much Warner Bros. paid Travers to put Catwoman on the list, or has he completely lost his mind?
Also, his movies to avoid: The Chronicles of Riddick, Around the World in 80 Days, The Notebook, and Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow. Sky Captain really doesn't belong on that list, I'd flip flop it with Catwoman.
Anyway, what does everyone else think?
#3
Banned by request
Travers was never a great critic to begin with. So many of his reviews just scream "Quote me in your newspaper ads!" I remember his review of Hannibal where he said it was better than The Silence of the Lambs. He's not as crazy as Maltin, but he's nowhere near a good critic.
#4
DVD Talk Legend
Travers is getting hard to trust as a critic. He will either bash a movie to no end if he doesn't like it or shill it like a madman if he likes it.
He also seems to have a pre-made decision on movies from people like Quentin Tarantino or starring Russell Crowe.
He also seems to have a pre-made decision on movies from people like Quentin Tarantino or starring Russell Crowe.
#7
DVD Talk Legend
Peter Travers is a total douchebag. He recycles his "memorbable" quotes that can be put in the film advertisements over and over again (like the "hooker's lip gloss" one). He did score some points with me after calling Camp one of the best films of 2003, but lost said points when he called Girl Next Door and The Matrix Revolutions some of the worse films he has ever seen.
#10
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 3,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Suprmallet
Travers was never a great critic to begin with. So many of his reviews just scream "Quote me in your newspaper ads!" I remember his review of Hannibal where he said it was better than The Silence of the Lambs. He's not as crazy as Maltin, but he's nowhere near a good critic.
Travers was never a great critic to begin with. So many of his reviews just scream "Quote me in your newspaper ads!" I remember his review of Hannibal where he said it was better than The Silence of the Lambs. He's not as crazy as Maltin, but he's nowhere near a good critic.
#12
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Groucho
OMG TEH CRITIC HAS DIFFERENT OPINION THAN ME THAT CAN'T BE ALOUD HE IS INSANE KTHNX BYE
OMG TEH CRITIC HAS DIFFERENT OPINION THAN ME THAT CAN'T BE ALOUD HE IS INSANE KTHNX BYE
#13
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by RyoHazuki
Well maybe he has seen Sky Captain and it wasn't good? I don't understand the Catwoman thing though.
Well maybe he has seen Sky Captain and it wasn't good? I don't understand the Catwoman thing though.
#15
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Rypro 525
then why did he give reservoir dogs 2.5 stars?
then why did he give reservoir dogs 2.5 stars?
#18
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not saying it isn't okay for Ebert, it just seems like from what I've read of his, he likes deep characters, and he doesn't tend to be impressed with lots of violence. It just seems like, from what I know of his likes/dislikes, he wouldn't normally like Kill Bill vol. 1.
Last edited by drjay; 04-24-04 at 06:23 PM.
#19
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by drjay
I'm not saying it isn't okay for Ebert, it just seems like from what I've read of his, he likes deep characters, and he doesn't tend to be impressed with lots of violence. It just seems like, from what I know of his likes/dislikes, he wouldn't normally like Kill Bill vol. 1.
I'm not saying it isn't okay for Ebert, it just seems like from what I've read of his, he likes deep characters, and he doesn't tend to be impressed with lots of violence. It just seems like, from what I know of his likes/dislikes, he wouldn't normally like Kill Bill vol. 1.
Not to mention...Kill Bill Vol. 1 is a very unique film. To compare to what he'd normally like...for that movie. Is pointless, because it is...very unique.
#20
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by jaeufraser
Are you sure about that? While Ebert isn't for gratuitous violence, he does love movies that are very visual, to the point he's given high marks to Spawn, The Cell, and others. Movies that were mostly style, and not much else.
Not to mention...Kill Bill Vol. 1 is a very unique film. To compare to what he'd normally like...for that movie. Is pointless, because it is...very unique.
Are you sure about that? While Ebert isn't for gratuitous violence, he does love movies that are very visual, to the point he's given high marks to Spawn, The Cell, and others. Movies that were mostly style, and not much else.
Not to mention...Kill Bill Vol. 1 is a very unique film. To compare to what he'd normally like...for that movie. Is pointless, because it is...very unique.
#21
DVD Talk Hero
I actually seem to agree with Ebert's take on that movies aren't what they're about but how they're about. Weither it be the characters or a heavy dosage of style (Dark City garnered fairly mixed reviews upon first release, still wound up #1 on Ebert's list for 1998, I personally love that movie as well). As well as other stuff like say, Lost in Translation. What's it about? Guy and Girl in Tokyo become friends. Could be either way.
But... That all said, I'm just rambling now to kill time
But... That all said, I'm just rambling now to kill time
#22
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
I've never found Travers to be a particularly good critic and his selection of Catwoman as a must see film solidifies how useless he is. C'mon anyone who has seen that trailer knows that this film is a steeming pile.
And I totally agree with my sig.
And I totally agree with my sig.
#23
Banned
Originally posted by badger1997
Wow, I thought I was the only one who thought Hannibal was better than Silence of the Lambs (one of the most overrated films ever in my opinion.)
Wow, I thought I was the only one who thought Hannibal was better than Silence of the Lambs (one of the most overrated films ever in my opinion.)
#25
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Not to mention...Kill Bill Vol. 1 is a very unique film.
yes, the anime interludes and B&W sequences, etc, etc seem unique, but this is hardly the first film to use them.
hell- even Xanadu had a sequence where the main characters were represented in an animated sequence.