Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

MAN ON FIRE thread...

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

MAN ON FIRE thread...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-04, 02:47 PM
  #1  
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MAN ON FIRE thread...

Haven’t read much about this film around here, so let this be the thread where the reactions are posted.

I saw it this morning, and thought it was terrible on many levels. But I’ll leave it at that for now. I’m very curious to hear more reactions – especially from those who found THE PUNISHER distasteful.
Old 04-21-04, 02:50 PM
  #2  
DVD Talk Reviewer Emeritus
 
Jason Bovberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,432
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Looking forward to this one. Great advance buzz from Jeffrey Wells (MoviePoopShoot) and David Poland (Hot Button), who calls it "the first great film of 2004."
Old 04-21-04, 03:16 PM
  #3  
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
waited in line for 45 minutes to see a sneak peak last friday. lenard maltin was there. sadly, they stopped taking people in with only 5 people in front of us. but we did get free tickets to the mvoies. i look forward to it
Old 04-21-04, 03:19 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
antennaball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The 7-8-Triple6, Texas
Posts: 3,620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seeing this one on Saturday, looking forward to it.
Old 04-21-04, 03:34 PM
  #5  
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: MAN ON FIRE thread...

Originally posted by scott shelton
Haven’t read much about this film around here, so let this be the thread where the reactions are posted.

I saw it this morning, and thought it was terrible on many levels. But I’ll leave it at that for now. I’m very curious to hear more reactions ?especially from those who found THE PUNISHER distasteful.
Even if this movie is bad, it cannot be any worse then the punisher...that movie was one of the worst ive ever seen...at least this one has denzel...i have yet to see one bad denzel movie...he's always consistent with his stuff...and with tony scott as the director, it should be good...
Old 04-21-04, 03:47 PM
  #6  
Retired
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 27,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The latest TV spot is kind of annoying.

It says like "a film unlike any other you've seen before" or something of that ilk, when it looks like a fairly standard revenge/vigilante/rescue the kidnapped person flick which has been done a gazillion times.

But of course it's wrong to judge a movie by it's previews, but still, I really don't see how this movie, even if it's very good, will be anything remotely original.
Old 04-21-04, 04:18 PM
  #7  
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Josh Hinkle
But of course it's wrong to judge a movie by it's previews, but still, I really don't see how this movie, even if it's very good, will be anything remotely original.
It was based on a novel, which was already made into a Scott Glen film back in 1987.

So we can take that pesky standard of "originality" out of the mix.
Old 04-21-04, 04:36 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It does have one of the best lines of recent years, delivered, apparently with a straight face, by Walken, in describing Denzel's forthcoming killing spree: "He's an artist of death, and he's about to paint his masterpiece."
Old 04-21-04, 05:31 PM
  #9  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In terms of originality, I saw some making-of thing (maybe an HBO first-look?) for about 5 minutes the other day and they were describing how the camerawork was done on hand-crank cameras from the early 1900's or something, so the film had a grainy quality. Not sure if they do this throughout the whole movie, but figured I'd mention it. I like Tony Scott alot, but Denzel's only recent flick worth seeing was Training Day. I'm definitely waiting till video for this.
Old 04-21-04, 05:58 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 8,085
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I've been hearing great things so far. I can't wait to see this.
Old 04-21-04, 06:06 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Kal-El's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fortress of Solitude
Posts: 7,992
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It's Tony Scott. It's Denzel. It's Walken. I'm watching.
Old 04-21-04, 06:09 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
http://my.aol.com/news/news_story.ps...03320002122980

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - Denzel Washington plays an avenging angel in "Man on Fire," a full-throttle, good-vs.-evil thriller about an ex-CIA agent bent on eliminating, one by one, a ruthless Mexican gang of kidnappers and dirty cops.

Everything is straightforward save for director Tony Scott's fussy style of hyperimages and flash editing, which he has developed in such similar melodramas as "Spy Game" and "Enemy of the State." Washington commands the screen with calm assurance, shares it well with his tiny co-star, Dakota Fanning, during the first half of the story and pretty much carries the marathon-length movie on his broad shoulders, as he is in nearly every scene.

At nearly 2-1/2 hours, exhibitors might lose a daily showing with "Man on Fire." But it won't matter much as the film looks primed to do excellent box office, with Washington pulling in above-average numbers for a film that should appeal to men of all ages and a good many women as well.

"Man on Fire" is actually a second go at the novel of pseudonymous author A.J. Quinnell by producer Arnon Milchan, who shepherded to the screen a 1987 French/Italian production starring Scott Glenn and Joe Pesci and directed by Elie Chouraqui. This production, of course, is considerably amped by Scott and a top-flight crew, with much time spent on atmosphere, stunts, conflagrations and dramatic confrontations.

Washington plays one of those burnt-out cases so beloved by thriller writers. In this instance, he is John Creasy, a former CIA assassin who has run out of people to kill. The only remaining target is himself. Alcoholic and without purpose, he drifts into Mexico to visit old pal and fellow ex-agent Rayburn (Christopher Walken). Rayburn fixes him up with a job as bodyguard to 9-year-old Pita Ramos (Fanning), daughter of stressed-out Mexican industrialist Samuel (singing sensation Marc Anthony) and his anxious Yankee wife, Lisa (Radha Mitchell). The family's smooth attorney (Mickey Rourke) has insisted on hiring a bodyguard as abductions occur round-the-clock in Mexico.

(The portrait of the country and its citizens is about as bleak as any studio picture ever made, essentially portraying Mexico as a cesspool of crime and corruption reaching upward into the social elite. Whether accurate or not, the movie is not likely to make Vicente Fox's top 10 list.)

Brian Helgeland's script can't help but traffic in predictable plot developments. Yes, Pita breaks down Creasy's resistance to life, even getting him to smile again and act as her swimming coach. And yes, Pita gets abducted and the ransom drop goes awry -- crooks beating other crooks to the prize -- and all is lost.

But Creasy, despite being badly wounded, methodically takes on the entire gang, a bloody trail of reprisals that leads to top cop Fuentes (Jesus Ochoa) and "the Voice" (Gustavo Sanchez Parra), who ordered the kidnapping. In this, he has the aid of Mexico's only apparent honest citizens, police inspector Manzano (Italian star Giancarlo Giannini) and fearless journalist Mariana (Rachel Ticotin).

Scott heightens the tension with cinematographer Paul Cameron's nervous, pivoting camera moves, Christian Wagner's quick edits, sudden shifts in motion, color and a dramatic play of light and shadows. Harry Gregson-Williams' percussion-driven Latin jazz score greatly pushes the mood of high anxiety.

While on fire, Washington plays it cool. Whether a drunk or revenge-minded killer, he is always in control. Fanning gets snatched away, which leaves a hole in the story, but Giannini and Ticotin help fill the gap by playing a pair of good guys who nevertheless exploit each other.

The film is always watchable, and the confrontations contain undeniable edgy excitement. But even if this weren't a remake, it would be a remake. Hollywood filmmakers have fished these waters so thoroughly that it's virtually impossible to land a big catch.

Fox 2000 Pictures and Regency Enterprises present a New Regency/Scott Free production

Cast: Creasy: Denzel Washington; Pita: Dakota Fanning; Samuel: Marc Anthony; Lisa: Radha Mitchell; Rayburn: Christopher Walken; Manzano: Giancarlo Giannini; Mariana: Rachel Ticotin; Fuentes: Jesus Ochoa; Jordan: Mickey Rourke.

Director: Tony Scott; Screenwriter: Brian Helgeland; Producers: Arnon Milchan, Tony Scott, Lucas Foster; Executive producers: Lance Hool, James W. Skotchdopole; Director of photography: Paul Cameron; Production designer: Benjamin Fernandez; Music: Harry Gregson-Williams; Co-producer: Conrad Hool; Costume designer: Louise Frogley; Editor: Christian Wagner.

Reuters/Hollywood Reporter



Reuters
Apr 21 2004 3:32AM
Old 04-21-04, 07:38 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East County
Posts: 35,178
Received 194 Likes on 159 Posts
Originally posted by Jason Bovberg
Looking forward to this one. Great advance buzz from Jeffrey Wells (MoviePoopShoot) and David Poland (Hot Button), who calls it "the first great film of 2004."
I was just going to say that Wells was gushing over this one in his column today.

Jason - I noticed last week he posted something you wrote about The Ladykillers at the end of his column. That's pretty cool.
Old 04-21-04, 07:40 PM
  #14  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East County
Posts: 35,178
Received 194 Likes on 159 Posts
Originally posted by Kal-El
It's Tony Scott. It's Denzel. It's Walken. I'm watching.
Old 04-21-04, 08:00 PM
  #15  
DVD Talk Reviewer Emeritus
 
Jason Bovberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,432
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Originally posted by B.A.
Jason - I noticed last week he posted something you wrote about The Ladykillers at the end of his column. That's pretty cool.
Oh yeah. Hey, thanks!
Old 04-22-04, 10:06 AM
  #16  
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
(Neg) www.filmjerk.com/nuke/article896.html

(Positive) www.joblo.com/manonfire.htm
Old 04-22-04, 11:27 AM
  #17  
Moderator
 
Geofferson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: The Village Green
Posts: 39,768
Received 99 Likes on 82 Posts
The advance buzz on this has me excited!
Old 04-22-04, 11:58 AM
  #18  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Trelach24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,011
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
There is no chance this movie can possibly be bad. It may not be great but after seeing the commercials for a couple weeks now, there's just no way this can be bad.

At the very least it's Denzel being pissed, running around and killing everyone. And that's enough for me.
Old 04-23-04, 08:54 AM
  #19  
Moderator
 
Geofferson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: The Village Green
Posts: 39,768
Received 99 Likes on 82 Posts
Ebert's 2 1/2 star review here.

After reading it, this is what I feared this movie may turn out to be. That said, chances are good that I'll still go see it.
Old 04-23-04, 09:33 AM
  #20  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Despite the subpar reviews, I still want to watch it. You can't go wrong with Walken.
Old 04-23-04, 12:31 PM
  #21  
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by tofu
Despite the subpar reviews, I still want to watch it. You can't go wrong with Walken.
Even KANGAROO JACK?

GIGLI?

THE COUNTRY BEARS?
Old 04-23-04, 12:42 PM
  #22  
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UNITED STATES!
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i heard it was very violent and very glossy-shot action-packed; that alone will sell tickets (for better or worse)

it's also directed by tony scott (top gun, spy games), so you know it will look like a 2.5 hour long car commercial (which depending on your tastes may or may not be a good thing, but it will LOOK good for sure)

the first half i hear is slow exposition, and the 2nd half is denzel going on a badass rampage, high body count

if anyone's got spoiler tags for how he dispatches with the baddies it would be appreciated.

here's one for starters:
Spoiler:
plastic explosives up a baddies' behind

Last edited by UKingdom; 04-23-04 at 12:47 PM.
Old 04-23-04, 01:21 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Germantown Maryland
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I might see this if I can get a free ticket from a friend who works at a theatre. It's got a decent cast, although I wonder why they decided to give it a title that makes it sound like a gay porn.
Old 04-23-04, 01:29 PM
  #24  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sitting on a beach, earning 20%
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by Rivero
... I wonder why they decided to give it a title that makes it sound like a gay porn.
Worked for The Passion...
Old 04-23-04, 01:43 PM
  #25  
MrX
DVD Talk Hero
 
MrX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 25,806
Received 259 Likes on 195 Posts
I enjoyed the book so I'll be checking this out.

It seems the big difference is
Spoiler:
The girl is killed in the book and that's what sets him off

Last edited by MrX; 04-23-04 at 02:22 PM.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.