Since Afflecker is out who should be DareDevil in a sequel
04-19-04 | 08:25 AM
#27
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,665
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: NYC * See da name? Go get me some coffee...
Originally posted by Ketamine
With US and international gross plus DVD sales it made well over $200,000,000 while it cost was $122,000,000 with budget and marketing costs. Looks like it did ok even though not widely liked. If they could get a better story for a sequel, then they might have something here.
With US and international gross plus DVD sales it made well over $200,000,000 while it cost was $122,000,000 with budget and marketing costs. Looks like it did ok even though not widely liked. If they could get a better story for a sequel, then they might have something here.
04-19-04 | 10:20 AM
#28
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Philly, PA
Exactly, they're just making comic book movies now to cash in on the success of spiderman and xmen. Just like all the lame sci fi movies that cashed in on Star Wars's sucess and all the lame fantasy movies that will cash in on LOTRs success. Eventually Hollywood will run the genre into the ground and then jump on the next bandwagon that comes along.
04-19-04 | 05:40 PM
#32
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
From: Sitting on a beach, earning 20%
I have to wonder. Why did Gore_hound type "Afflecker"? Is it supposed to be short for "Affleck"? It's not, it's longer. It doesn't sound right. It makes no sense. What is an "Afflecker"? ENLIGHTEN us, mr. Hound.
