Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Christopher Lee has been CUT from ROTK!

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Christopher Lee has been CUT from ROTK!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-03 | 04:21 PM
  #26  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 26,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: in da cloud
My wife may ask me that. I'll tell her since I read the book and she will forget about it after that.
Old 11-11-03 | 04:38 PM
  #27  
Hokeyboy's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,860
Received 1,044 Likes on 623 Posts
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Originally posted by Eric F
He has a big role at the end of the third book.
Absolutely true, but Peter Jackson had announced even before filming that the scouring of the Shire had been dropped. Sorry I didn't make myself clearer. Now let's all join together and poo in a melon!
Old 11-11-03 | 04:39 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kaffe_02: The petition to protest this is here....

http://www.petitiononline.com/smanrotk/
Old 11-11-03 | 05:12 PM
  #29  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Wooo hoo, time to fake some signitures!
Old 11-11-03 | 05:58 PM
  #30  
RoboDad's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 5,960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: A far green country
Originally posted by Inverse
Kaffe_02: The petition to protest this is here....

http://www.petitiononline.com/smanrotk/
You do realize, of course, that this petition is completely, utterly pointless. The final cut of the film has already been delivered to the studio. It premieres in four weeks. It opens wide in five. They have several thousand prints to make and distribute between today and opening day. The time for changing things has passed.
Old 11-11-03 | 06:08 PM
  #31  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
exactly. no point in fighting it, this will be how it is.
Old 11-11-03 | 09:03 PM
  #32  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't like this cut. No Sir'ee - but there is nothing I can do about it. I'll reserve judgement, as PJ has done an excellent job with this trilogy so far ..
Old 11-11-03 | 09:07 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually Robo, AICN quoted PJ on Friday as saying he's still working on the movie and there was a week to go:

http://www.aint-it-cool-news.com/display.cgi?id=16462

Yes, it's true it's unlikely a petition will force a change at this late date, but if nothing else it's a gesture of support for Christopher Lee, who is seeing what should be a climactic moment in his career evaporate. (He's no longer in the credits, he's not going to the premiere, etc.)

Last edited by Inverse; 11-11-03 at 09:13 PM.
Old 11-11-03 | 10:54 PM
  #34  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 20,188
Received 344 Likes on 220 Posts
From: behind the eight ball
Originally posted by Inverse
Actually Robo, AICN quoted PJ on Friday as saying he's still working on the movie and there was a week to go:

http://www.aint-it-cool-news.com/display.cgi?id=16462

Yes, it's true it's unlikely a petition will force a change at this late date, but if nothing else it's a gesture of support for Christopher Lee, who is seeing what should be a climactic moment in his career evaporate. (He's no longer in the credits, he's not going to the premiere, etc.)
I thought it was mid-november last year that they reported TTT was "in the can."

If this is true, it's sad that Christopher Lee will not have his big moment. Not only is Lee a great Saurman, he's a huge fan of Middle-Earth in general. I always thought that being in both LOTR and the Star Wars prequels was an incredible way to cap an incredible career. Now it seems he's getting screwed right at the end.

And I'm sure if people thought anyone would screw him, it would be lucas.

PJ has been worshipped (with good reason, for the most part) for his treatment of these films. If he's going to sacrifice the downfall of a major villian and the finale of a decades long film career for the sake of keeping a few extra shots of CGI oliphants and swarming orcs, he's making a big mistake. He even said himself that Sauruman had to assume a bigger role as a villian because Sauron is nothing but a flaming eyeball, and there's not much he can do with that.
Old 11-11-03 | 11:10 PM
  #35  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 20,188
Received 344 Likes on 220 Posts
From: behind the eight ball
Well, a thought just crossed my mind on how this might actually work.

Early in the film, Theoden, Gandalf, and Aragorn could be having a council, and Theoden could say something about the threat of Isengard. Gandalf could then reply that Saurman has been rendered powerless by the Ents, and will trouble us no more. As long as Saurman is powerless, it doesn't really matter what happens to him. He had no impact on the Minas Tirith storyline. Merry and Pippin will probably just find the palantir in the flotsam and jetsam of Isengard.

Of course, this fails to explain how M&P rejoin the rest of the fellowship.

Hardly satisfying for the serious fan, but at least it tells the audience he's safely out of the story, and it's better than nothing.
Old 11-11-03 | 11:47 PM
  #36  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My complaint is that P.J. stated that there wasn't enough material in the Two Towers (the book) to fill a movie, so he had to pad things out (Aragorn's drowning, Dream sequences of Elrond/Arwen, etc), but then he goes and cuts out large parts of the book that are important (the Voice of Saruman and Palantir chapters, etc), and doesn't bother adding those things to the third movie.

I'm sorry, but that is lame. This is truly "Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings", and not Tolkiens.
Old 11-11-03 | 11:53 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Inverse
Kaffe_02: The petition to protest this is here....

http://www.petitiononline.com/smanrotk/
LOL I was only kidding but wow I cant beleive that there is one out there for this. As ususal the theatrical release is just to tide us over for the EE and maybe Christopher Lee will be in there.
Old 11-12-03 | 12:14 AM
  #38  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 46,698
Received 1,392 Likes on 1,094 Posts
I just say wait to see how it's handled first.

I mean, it's kind of stupid to assume that because that scene isn't in the theaterical cut that his character will just mysteriously disappear. It'll either be mentioned or perhaps a shorter version (the original sequence is 7 minutes long) will be shown at the beginning. I'm sure they'll find some work around, I'll withhold judgement til I see it, but it'd suck if Lee isn't in the movie at all - flashback or otherwise - he just deserves this appearance.

But at least there's always the EE.

-Rich
Old 11-12-03 | 11:41 AM
  #39  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Carrollton, Ga
For some reason this doesn't bother me. Never thought much of the villians in the LOTR films anyway, as they never really do anything. You rarely if ever see them. Saruman has all of maybe 10 minutes in both films so far, if that. Sauron is not even a human being. He's a ghost that manifests itself as a big fire eyeball.

We'll see how it works out.
Old 11-12-03 | 12:09 PM
  #40  
Josh-da-man's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 49,614
Received 4,547 Likes on 2,991 Posts
From: The Bible Belt
I agree that it is unfortunate this was left out of TTT, when that film had so much unnecessary padding. Saruman could've been dealt with at the end of that film, instead of the pointless Aragorn "death" scene. It also would've given closure to Wormtongue's arc begun earlier in the film.

Also, it's a pretty shitty thing to do to Lee.

From a storyline perspective, the Isengard scenes seem pretty important, too. It serves to bring Merry and Pippin back into the mix, and brings the Palantir into Gandalf's possession.

First really big black eye on the series.
Old 11-12-03 | 12:25 PM
  #41  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 24,494
Received 458 Likes on 350 Posts
From: Daytona Beach, FL
The palantir bit will bother me. Surely Saruman wouldn't leave such an important thing lying around.
Old 11-12-03 | 04:04 PM
  #42  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Surrounded by idiots...
I don't like this idea, but I guess I can imagine that Saruman died during the Ent battle, even though I've read the books and know better.

It doesn't affect my life one way or the other.
Old 11-12-03 | 04:28 PM
  #43  
caligulathegod's Avatar
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,901
Received 74 Likes on 45 Posts
From: Grove City OH
As far as I'm concerned, it's irrelevent. I consider the EE versions the "true" versions, anyway. The TE is just a compromised preview of the true version.
Old 11-12-03 | 05:39 PM
  #44  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 14,812
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Second Star on the right, and straight on til' morning...
I agree that the Theatrical releases are the "required cut 3 hour" teasers for the 4 hour movies....
Old 11-12-03 | 06:40 PM
  #45  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,534
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: San Diego, CA
moderator: How about some SPOILERS in the title here! (I haven't read any of the posts, but I don't need spoilers in titles of threads!)
Old 11-13-03 | 09:16 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: South Shore Massachusetts
Gandalf and crew will still travel to Isengard and get Merry and Pippin and get the Palantir, they just won't be getting the Palantir from Wormtongue throwing it anymore.
Old 11-13-03 | 10:05 AM
  #47  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Massachusetts
Saruman speaks!

from the imdb
Christopher Lee Cut from 'Return of the King'


Lord Of The Rings actor Christopher Lee is fuming after discovering all of his scenes have been cut from the third and final fantasy epic. The 81-year-old, who plays Saruman in the first two Lord Of The Rings films, says he was "shocked" and mystified by his exclusion from The Return Of The King - which hits cinemas worldwide next month - and has vowed to boycott the star-studded premieres. Lee says, "The only reason I'm able to say this is because it was on the internet and has been for some days. I only heard recently. As far as I'm concerned, I'm only telling you this because it has been revealed on the internet, someone has talked and it certainly wasn't me. Of course I am very shocked, that's all I can say. If you want to know why you would have to ask the company New Line or director Peter Jackson and his associates because I still don't really know why. I can't say any more because I signed a confidentiality agreement and I honored my word." And after being asked if he planned to attend any of the premieres, Lee snapped back, "No, what's the point? What's the point of going? None at all."
Old 11-13-03 | 10:30 AM
  #48  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 23,225
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Plano, TX
Well.. I would say "What a baby.." but if he's not in the movie, what IS the point? I think more than anything, it's not a question of Saruman being cut from the movie more than Chistopher Lee is the closest to Middle Earth than ANY of the people invovled in the movie, save for maybe Alan Lee. I'm sure this hits him more than just "being taken out of the movie" but being taken out of the world he's loved for many, many decades. If I remember on the commentary, John Rhys-Davies mentions that Chris actually had Tolkien's consent to play Gandalf if a movie version was ever made.
Old 11-13-03 | 10:47 AM
  #49  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
Originally posted by Ted The Bug
Gandalf and crew will still travel to Isengard and get Merry and Pippin and get the Palantir, they just won't be getting the Palantir from Wormtongue throwing it anymore.
hey ted (or anyone for that matter) can you refresh my memory on this scene from the book. As I understand it the filmed version of this scene
Spoiler:
actually is the conclusion of the Saruman/Grima storyline resulting in the death of at least one of them.
Old 11-13-03 | 11:58 AM
  #50  
Cusm's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 7,840
Received 122 Likes on 79 Posts
From: Moore, OK
Originally posted by Giles
hey ted (or anyone for that matter) can you refresh my memory on this scene from the book. As I understand it the filmed version of this scene
Spoiler:
actually is the conclusion of the Saruman/Grima storyline resulting in the death of at least one of them.

Spoiler:
Worm throws it down, in an attempt to get them to flee the tower. Gandolph sees what it is and tells them to leave, because the damage is done and Saruman is pretty much powerless. Saruman is pissed but does not kill Worm.

In the final chapter it is discovered that Saruman is the cause of the fall of the shire. During the scouring of the shire the Hobbits confront Saruman. Worm finally tired of all the abuse suffered at the hand of his master kills Saruman. The hobbits let him be, IIRC.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.