Intereting tidbit about the Architecht's words
#1
Thread Starter
New Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Intereting tidbit about the Architecht's words
This was brought up in another thread by someone else, but it didn't get much attention.
In the Architect/Neo conversation, the Architect tells Neo, "Your 5 predecessors were, BY DESIGN, based on a similar predication a contingent affirmation that was meant to create a profound attachment to the rest of your species facilitating the function of the One."
By design? Who's the designer? The architect?
Discuss amongst yourselves.
In the Architect/Neo conversation, the Architect tells Neo, "Your 5 predecessors were, BY DESIGN, based on a similar predication a contingent affirmation that was meant to create a profound attachment to the rest of your species facilitating the function of the One."
By design? Who's the designer? The architect?
Discuss amongst yourselves.
#3
DVD Talk Godfather
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Amongst ourselves? Why not in the community.
My take.. this does not throw any proof in the Matrix In a Matrix theory. that is still pretty silly and I would feel as if it was a huge let down.
My take.. this does not throw any proof in the Matrix In a Matrix theory. that is still pretty silly and I would feel as if it was a huge let down.
#4
Re: Intereting tidbit about the Architecht's words
• Quoth Moldy Potato •
In the Architect/Neo conversation, the Architect tells Neo, "Your 5 predecessors were, BY DESIGN, based on a similar predication a contingent affirmation that was meant to create a profound attachment to the rest of your species facilitating the function of the One."
By design? Who's the designer? The architect?
In the Architect/Neo conversation, the Architect tells Neo, "Your 5 predecessors were, BY DESIGN, based on a similar predication a contingent affirmation that was meant to create a profound attachment to the rest of your species facilitating the function of the One."
By design? Who's the designer? The architect?
das
#7
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Philly
Re: Intereting tidbit about the Architecht's words
Originally posted by Moldy Potato
This was brought up in another thread by someone else, but it didn't get much attention.
In the Architect/Neo conversation, the Architect tells Neo, "Your 5 predecessors were, BY DESIGN, based on a similar predication a contingent affirmation that was meant to create a profound attachment to the rest of your species facilitating the function of the One."
By design? Who's the designer? The architect?
Discuss amongst yourselves.
This was brought up in another thread by someone else, but it didn't get much attention.
In the Architect/Neo conversation, the Architect tells Neo, "Your 5 predecessors were, BY DESIGN, based on a similar predication a contingent affirmation that was meant to create a profound attachment to the rest of your species facilitating the function of the One."
By design? Who's the designer? The architect?
Discuss amongst yourselves.
http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...5&pagenumber=3
i've been thinking that maybe 'by design' means that it's simply part of human nature.
#8
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think this line needs to be viewed from the perspective of psychology (nature v. nurture) and the nature of the Matrix.
When a person is "born" into the Matrix the machines can assign each newborn into a family and life. The machines have been demonstrating and explaining they can control every aspect of the Matrix, so they could seemingly dictate the vast majority of a persons life experiences if they desired. Therefore, they could nurture (design) a human if they desired. (In most cases I think they limit their nurturing, but when the time comes for "The One" to help reload the source...)
But what if man is more strongly influenced by nature (genetics) and now their nurturing effect has been limited in Neo?
When a person is "born" into the Matrix the machines can assign each newborn into a family and life. The machines have been demonstrating and explaining they can control every aspect of the Matrix, so they could seemingly dictate the vast majority of a persons life experiences if they desired. Therefore, they could nurture (design) a human if they desired. (In most cases I think they limit their nurturing, but when the time comes for "The One" to help reload the source...)
But what if man is more strongly influenced by nature (genetics) and now their nurturing effect has been limited in Neo?
#9
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles, California
I took the Architecht's explanation of The One as an anomaly that grows out of any one in the Matrix. The One isn't really chosen; it just happens.... therefore I think the anomaly grows out of people who are more compassionate towards humanity than others. I don't think "by design" meant literally designed or manufactured that way by the Matrix, but the very nature of who the anomaly grows out of in the Matrix.
I dunno if that made any sense... but that's my take on it.
I dunno if that made any sense... but that's my take on it.
#10
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with you Crack 6k. The One is an anomaly, something not designed but an unfortunate side effect of the "perfect" Matrix they tried to create. The control measures of Zion and such were designed to control this anomaly, but I don't think the One is in fact a designed program rather than a nuisance the Matrix has to deal with.
#11
DVD Talk Hero
I took it to mean that the anomaly were those human inhabitants that formed the society living in Zion and that the One was created to learn from (in an attempt to avoid the anomaly's reappearance) and then do away with this anomaly. This would be to eventually be done with Zion once and for all and never have to upgrade the Matrix again.
Last edited by RocShemp; 05-28-03 at 12:31 AM.
#12
Cool New Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: MA
The One is an anomaly, something not designed but an unfortunate side effect of the "perfect" Matrix they tried to create
#13
Suspended
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: You have moved into a dark place. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Isn't the Architect God the Father?
And I wouldn't be surprised if in the end we find out that it was the machines who built the humans, and not the other way around.
-- Jough
And I wouldn't be surprised if in the end we find out that it was the machines who built the humans, and not the other way around.
-- Jough
#15
Suspended
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: You have moved into a dark place. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
The Animatrix isn't considered Matrix "Canon" is it? It'll be interesting to see if anything is contradicted from the Animatrix when the third film is released.
-- Jough
-- Jough
#16
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally posted by jough
The Animatrix isn't considered Matrix "Canon" is it? It'll be interesting to see if anything is contradicted from the Animatrix when the third film is released.
-- Jough
The Animatrix isn't considered Matrix "Canon" is it? It'll be interesting to see if anything is contradicted from the Animatrix when the third film is released.
-- Jough

And by the way, I thought it was far superior to Reloaded. I just watched it tonight and I think it was good enough to deserve a theatrical release. Most all the shorts were good or very good with far more interesting stories than the feature, plus very nicely done animation.




