Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters
View Poll Results: G&G: Opening day?
Hells yes, nothing short of a bullet would keep me away!
18
32.14%
Sure, I guess. Maybe there's appeal in watching bigscreen battles... or something.
9
16.07%
Nah... I'll check it out on video instead.
18
32.14%
You on crack? Me watch A movie or THIS movie opening day? Psh.
11
19.64%
Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll

Gods and Generals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-03 | 06:19 PM
  #26  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 8,466
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Stephen Lang
Old 02-05-03 | 08:29 PM
  #27  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Currently in the Nexus.
There is very little blood in Gettysburg, and even though the movie is rated PG-13, I'm guessing there will be a little more in Gods & Generals.
Yeah, hopefully a little more. I think that it's rated PG-13 for the purpose of attracting more viewers; a number of pedagogues, history buffs, and librarians! all seem to agree that it'll be good for the "younger readers" and history students. Hrm... I remember sitting in the theaters surrounded by history kiddies during Amistad one time. *yeesh*
Old 02-23-03 | 10:50 PM
  #28  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Currently in the Nexus.
MOVIE SPOILERS

Wow... I rank it a solid 9 out of 10.


Rambling... this is all I'm going to do. Here goes:
Spoiler:
Although I had minor doubts about seeing him as Stonewall instead of Pickett, Stephen Lang was surprisingly superb this time around. The Irish bits of the movie were truly moving, during their approach to the wall... For those of you who were turned off by the MPAA rating, Gods and Generals was nothing like Gettysburg in that the latter had a conspicuous lack of blood. If you're looking for gore similar to something from Braveheart, Starship Troopers et al, then you have the wrong movie. G&G is more drama than action and it's pretty damn long; it's also no LOTR if you think the near 4 hours is going to fly by.


Nonetheless, there are plenty of other things that I loved about this movie, but it already has a place ready in my DVD collection.

Anyone check out the deleted scenes on the movie album? Thoughts on them?

Last edited by FHaggis; 02-24-03 at 12:52 PM.
Old 02-24-03 | 11:03 AM
  #29  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 8,466
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
FHaggis:

This is what you type when you have spoilers to give:

[spoiler]SPOILER Goes inside here[ /spoiler]

One thing though, do not put any spaces inbetween the brackets.
Try it out by editing your post.
Old 02-24-03 | 11:48 AM
  #30  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 23,427
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Formerly known as "brizz"/kck
well, from what i've read so far G&G is a good movie, but also terribly DRY. It sounds like the historical details are fantastic, but only because of loooong periods of Duval et al going over plans, etc ad infinitum. So perhaps a great flick for true CW buffs, but probably not for the casual fan. I'll be skipping it in the theater, largely because it's friggin 4 hours long.

The funniest thing about this is a radio comercial i heard for it which offered a disclaimer at the end that it 'may not be suitable for young children due to battle scenes." how about may not be suitable for young children because they will go insane if you try to make them sit in one place for FOUR HOURS!@!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Old 02-24-03 | 12:59 PM
  #31  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Currently in the Nexus.
well, from what i've read so far G&G is a good movie, but also terribly DRY. It sounds like the historical details are fantastic, but only because of loooong periods of Duval
What? I wonder if you were reading comments about Gettysburg because Robert Duvall barely had any protracted monologues; he was actually pretty succinct and delivered his lines very well. When Martin Sheen played Lee, I kept yawning, turning up the volume, and checking my watch.

It's seriously not that dry though and the near 4 hours... well, there's an intermission for potty breaks and food.
Old 02-24-03 | 02:53 PM
  #32  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Atlanta, GA
It seemed a lot longer than four hours.
Old 02-24-03 | 10:15 PM
  #33  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 23,427
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Formerly known as "brizz"/kck
FHaggis - note i said "Duval et al"....and i said Duval only because that was the one name i could recall off hand. I'm not sure where the review i read was - either RT or in a local weekly. Like I said, they didn't say it was bad, but that it could be terribly tedious for lengths of time in a way that a non CW buff might find pretty boring, if not excruciating in the detail. I'm a historian actually, and will definately see this, but not in the theater....I'm sure i'll enjoy the 'detail' on my couch with plenty of snacks and beverages

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.