Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Help! Can someone explain to me the whole wesley crusher/star trek thing.

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Help! Can someone explain to me the whole wesley crusher/star trek thing.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-02, 08:06 PM
  #1  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: A little bit here and a little bit there.
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Help! Can someone explain to me the whole wesley crusher/star trek thing.

I enjoy the star trek films, I watched a few episodes of the next generation show, I just got back from Nemesis.

I am confused to why the character of wesley crusher played by will wheaton was not on display in the other films and this one.
He has a cameo in nemesis, but doesn't even say a word.

Was there bad blood between will and the producers of the show? What were the circumstances? And why isn't he in the other films?

Any answers are much appreciated, thanks!
Old 12-15-02, 08:11 PM
  #2  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 16,666
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I don't know anything about Star Trek at all, but I believe he discusses his conflicts with the show producers on his website, WilWheaton.com i think.
Old 12-15-02, 08:31 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: A little bit here and a little bit there.
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by LBPound
I don't know anything about Star Trek at all, but I believe he discusses his conflicts with the show producers on his website, WilWheaton.com i think.
Thanks LB.

I checked his site out.

It looks like his scene was cut from the film and that the producers of the show are, lets say, a little less than supporting of him. They didn't even invite him to the premiere. Not nice!

His site is actually pretty cool for a self run celebrity site.
I will be checking it out further.
Old 12-16-02, 03:02 AM
  #4  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Josh-da-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Bible Belt
Posts: 43,946
Received 2,743 Likes on 1,889 Posts
Wil Wheaton seems like a pretty cool, down-to-Earth guy.

He's gotten a lot of flack from Trekkies over the years who HATED Wesley with a passion, which is really petty and unfair.
Old 12-16-02, 03:20 AM
  #5  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wil Wheaton is a big tool.

and if you do a search you will see other threads about this lamer.
Old 12-16-02, 03:28 AM
  #6  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 1,831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure that Wil Wheaton's lines were cut out because of pacing and time. I doubt that the producers would cut him out of the movie on a grudge.

Actually, I don't think Wesley Crusher shouldn't have been in the movie at all. In the series, he left with The Traveler to become another being, or something like that. Perhaps the Traveler left his phone number with Beverly Crusher?

I think Wil Wheaton is taking it all too personally if he's complaining that he was left on the cutting room floor.
Old 12-16-02, 10:07 AM
  #7  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Heat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 16,702
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What does he look like now? I keep imagining him as a 14 or 15 year old.
Old 12-16-02, 10:11 AM
  #8  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: is everything
Posts: 17,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I heard that there was a whole subplot with him cut out of the movie.
Old 12-16-02, 11:36 AM
  #9  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Docking Bay 94
Posts: 14,259
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm certain that his scenes were cut for pacing... we'll probably see them on the DVD.

Seriously, as much as I like the guy and never had too much of a problem with the Wesley character, the last thing that movie needed was to put on the breaks on for few minutes so we could "catch up" with the character. He isn't important to the rest of the story, so it wasn't important to know anything about him. Putting him in the scene makes sense... having him talk really doesn't. That's what the novelization is for.
Old 12-19-02, 06:18 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: NYC
Posts: 17,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Heat
What does he look like now? I keep imagining him as a 14 or 15 year old.


And yeah, he wasn't invited to the cast premiere, only to the Paramount employee premiere, which is a pretty clear "**** you." Apparently he passed and just went with some friends.
Old 12-19-02, 06:27 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Leandro , CA
Posts: 1,636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They cut him out and reportedly cut out about 40 minutes of good character stuff so they could bring in the more Action crowd. In the process they pissed fans off and didnt get the action fans in. The movie made only 18 million. Nuff said.
Wheatons scene(s) couldnt have slowed the pacing down by much. I just dont believe that.
Old 12-19-02, 06:38 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Numanoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Down in 'The Park'
Posts: 27,881
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Director's cut DVD...Director's cut DVD...oh please, oh please!!!
Old 12-19-02, 06:41 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Boise
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally posted by jarofclay73
I think Wil Wheaton is taking it all too personally if he's complaining that he was left on the cutting room floor.
Actually in his posting about the call he received from Berman, Wil completely understood them cutting his scene and did not take it personally at all. It hurt, but he figured his scene would be the first to go when they started to trim the film.

What he did take personally was not even being invited to the premiere. Like they couldn't spare two feakin tickets.
Old 12-19-02, 06:51 PM
  #14  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well he still has the sequel to stand by me to look forward to...
Old 12-19-02, 11:05 PM
  #15  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Bartertown due to it having a better economy than where I really live.
Posts: 29,834
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
plus he was in uniform
that made no sense since he left the academy to go with the traveler
Old 12-19-02, 11:21 PM
  #16  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok, i hated his character on the show... followed by that psychic woman ("i sense anger..." do you think???)

isn't he hosting the G4TV Arena show? this thread reminded me of that guy... he looked familiar but i couldn't place him.
Old 01-06-03, 04:40 PM
  #17  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
dhmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Kissimmee, Florida
Posts: 7,422
Received 67 Likes on 58 Posts
Looking at his site, though, he has something that's total nonsense on it ( http://www.wilwheaton.net/faq.php#trek ), in which he says that he wasn't able to be in the movie Valmont because Roddenberry had died and whomever replaced him wouldn't let Wheaton miss a single episode to appear in the film.

Well, given that Milos Forman's Valmont was released in 1989 ( http://us.imdb.com/Details?0098575 ) and Roddenberry didn't die until two years later in 1991, his argument doesn't hold water. He either has a faulty memory on this subject or he doesn't want to make Roddenberry look bad for not allowing him to be in this movie (in which I'd imagine he would've had Henry "Elliott from E.T." Thomas' role). I have no trouble believing he was considered for this movie, though, because this would've been soon after his generally well-regarded performance in Stand By Me
Old 01-06-03, 05:42 PM
  #18  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Boise
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally posted by dhmac
Looking at his site, though, he has something that's total nonsense on it ( http://www.wilwheaton.net/faq.php#trek ), in which he says that he wasn't able to be in the movie Valmont because Roddenberry had died and whomever replaced him wouldn't let Wheaton miss a single episode to appear in the film.

Well, given that Milos Forman's Valmont was released in 1989 ( http://us.imdb.com/Details?0098575 ) and Roddenberry didn't die until two years later in 1991, his argument doesn't hold water. He either has a faulty memory on this subject or he doesn't want to make Roddenberry look bad for not allowing him to be in this movie (in which I'd imagine he would've had Henry "Elliott from E.T." Thomas' role). I have no trouble believing he was considered for this movie, though, because this would've been soon after his generally well-regarded performance in Stand By Me
He may have been referring to the fact that after Roddenbery had become ill, he wasn't really controling the show even though he was alive and was still somewhat involved. There was a certian point when he was alive, but the operation of the show was being handled by Berman.
Old 01-06-03, 05:49 PM
  #19  
DVD Talk Legend
 
calhoun07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
All will be rectified for the next Trek movie:

Old 01-06-03, 06:00 PM
  #20  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,049
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by mikehunt
plus he was in uniform
that made no sense since he left the academy to go with the traveler
(A) Most likely he was back to witness the marriage of Deanna and Riker. You don't think he completely took leave of his corporeal existence and extended Enterprise family, do you?

(B) When ex-military people go out at a formal event in public, many times they do slip back into their military dress uniform for the occasion. Why couldn't Wesley have been doing that?

Why must every last second of the lives of every character in the Trek franchise be minutely detailed on screen? Can't the details be filled in using one's imagination?
Old 01-31-03, 04:09 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: D/FW, Texas
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wesley is wearing a Starfleet Lieutenant's uniform in the film, and J.M. Dillard's novelization of John Logan's script places Lieutenant Crusher as serving in engineering on the Titan, Captain Riker's new command. No explanation of him leaving his studies with the Traveler is given, however.
Old 01-31-03, 12:39 PM
  #22  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
quote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wesley is wearing a Starfleet Lieutenant's uniform in the film, and J.M. Dillard's novelization of John Logan's script places Lieutenant Crusher as serving in engineering on the Titan, Captain Riker's new command. No explanation of him leaving his studies with the Traveler is given, however.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Which just goes to show how little the current creative regime knows about the show. It's one thing to forget a monor detail like the name of a planet some character mentioned 20 years ago, but to forget/ignore the details of a main character's farewell is pretty sloppy.

Wesley in uniform didn't bother, me, because as mentioned before, he WAS an ensign before he left with the Traveller. Why he was there at all was what bothered me. One measley line to explain that his journey with the Traveller had brought him back to known space or something like that would have taken 30 seconds at the most, not slowed the movie down appreciably and answered a lot of questions.
Old 01-31-03, 02:48 PM
  #23  
Fok
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Fok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Canada, BC
Posts: 6,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They shouldn't of bought him back. His character didn't serve any purpose in Star Trek in the first place, just some smart wonder boy. I'd rather have them focus on the main characters instead, that what's I'm interested in.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.