Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Weird Poltergiest "fact" from E! Special

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Weird Poltergiest "fact" from E! Special

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-02 | 10:53 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Weird Poltergiest "fact" from E! Special

Did anyone watch it. During the making of Poltergiest 3, the doc claims the director had a "business comitment" so they had to stop production for 4 months. That makes no sense to me. Does anyone know the truth behind that?

The actors give Speilberg most of the credit (as opposed to Tobe Hooper the credited director.) Did the doc confirm that Spielberg directed much of the film?
Old 10-28-02 | 02:06 PM
  #2  
Obey The D's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,626
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Northern NJ
Re: Weird Poltergiest "fact" from E! Special

Originally posted by Kube
Did anyone watch it. During the making of Poltergiest 3, the doc claims the director had a "business comitment" so they had to stop production for 4 months. That makes no sense to me. Does anyone know the truth behind that?

The actors give Speilberg most of the credit (as opposed to Tobe Hooper the credited director.) Did the doc confirm that Spielberg directed much of the film?
The impression I got was that Hooper was brought on because Universal didn't want Spielberg to direct Poltergiest since it was going to be released around the same time as E.T.
However, The Doc. talked about how Spielberg was pretty heavily involved with the making of Poltergiest and that he was on the set pretty much all through the filming providing his "input".
Old 10-28-02 | 04:46 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Grounded in reality. For the most part.
Does anyone know if that special is being replayed?

I missed it.
Old 10-28-02 | 05:14 PM
  #4  
New Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only one that Spielberg had anything to do with was the first.
He was the producer.


J
Old 10-28-02 | 05:50 PM
  #5  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 18,386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Banging your mother
He did more than produce it. All the actors discussed his direction on set and the FX guy even made a comment about Spielberg overruling a judgement call Tobe made on a prop.
Pretty funny because when they ask the actors point blank if Tobe really was the director they all say yes. Then they go right back to talking about Spielbergs involvement and dont bring Tobe up again.
Old 10-28-02 | 06:40 PM
  #6  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 14,259
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Docking Bay 94
Yeah, that's the way it always is with that movie. No matter what the credits say, it's Spielberg's film. Actually, it's pretty obvious just by watching the film.

Watch Poltergiest. Then watch Close Encounters and E.T. Then watch all of Tobe Hooper's films. Then tell me who directed Poltergiest.

Anyway, that's the way it has been for the past twenty years. The cast/crew *swears* that there was nothing weird going on, and that Tobe Hooper directed the film. Then they mention nothing about him and go on about "So Steve said this, and Steve wanted me to do that, and Steve suggested these other things." Every still from the set shows Hooper sitting in a corner eating donuts while Spielberg is positioning actors or moving sets.
Old 10-28-02 | 07:29 PM
  #7  
William Fuld's Avatar
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,072
Received 137 Likes on 82 Posts
Originally posted by Alien Redrum
Does anyone know if that special is being replayed?

I missed it.
It replays 10/31 at 8 p.m, 11/2 at 11 a.m, and 11/3 at 1 p.m.
Old 10-28-02 | 07:44 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Grounded in reality. For the most part.
Originally posted by William Fuld
It replays 10/31 at 8 p.m, 11/2 at 11 a.m, and 11/3 at 1 p.m.



Thanks!!
Old 10-29-02 | 08:20 AM
  #9  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
Here's to hoping this will get the rumoured DVD Special Edition of "Poltergeist" to get released sooner.
Old 10-29-02 | 08:23 AM
  #10  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 18,386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Banging your mother
I think the bad blood and behind the scenes ugliness will ensure we never get a SE of Poltergeist. Maybe right after the two disc Twilight Zone The Movie.
Old 10-29-02 | 08:33 AM
  #11  
Groucho's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 71,383
Received 130 Likes on 92 Posts
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Little known fact: the film was actually directed by none other than Hooper X.

Old 10-29-02 | 01:13 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 6,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: "Sitting on a beach, earning 20%"
Originally posted by joltaddict
I think the bad blood and behind the scenes ugliness will ensure we never get a SE of Poltergeist. Maybe right after the two disc Twilight Zone The Movie.
This would be a great DVD. I can think of one clever use of the multi-angle function
Old 10-29-02 | 06:09 PM
  #13  
TomOpus's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 41,597
Received 1,808 Likes on 1,294 Posts
From: Kansas City, MO
I missed the first part of the E! show, so will try to catch the rest another time.

If anyone has the laserdisc of Poltergiest, check out the documentary. There is only 1 or 2 shots of Hooper and the rest is of Spielberg. Also, I read some time ago, that Spielberg got in trouble with the Director's Guild because he had too much "input" into the movie.... a union no-no.
Old 10-30-02 | 09:28 AM
  #14  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Any thoughts on why P3 was shut down

for 4 months?
Old 10-30-02 | 09:33 AM
  #15  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 18,386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Banging your mother
*shrug*
Ran out of suck and had to import some more from overseas?
Old 10-30-02 | 04:54 PM
  #16  
Numanoid's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 27,881
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Down in 'The Park'
The wife and I watched this on TCM the other night (her first time to see it, my 500th or so). Robert Osborne mentioned in the intro that Spielberg co-wrote the movie as well as produce, and the only reason he didn't direct was because of E.T. With that info in mind I paid particular attention to the film (I haven't seen it for years) and all I can say is this - Poltergeist is a Spielberg film from start to finish. Classic Spielberg lighting and camera moves. If you showed this film to a class of film students who had never seen it before, 85% of them would instantly identify it as a Spielberg film, I guarantee it.
Old 10-30-02 | 06:11 PM
  #17  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Arizona
Interesting little fact

As far as the credit thing goes..........I wouldn't want to take credit for watching (which I unfortunately did), let alone directing that movie.

Part 3 IMHO =
Old 11-01-02 | 03:05 PM
  #18  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,272
Received 493 Likes on 354 Posts
Originally posted by joltaddict
*shrug*
Ran out of suck and had to import some more from overseas?


That's the funniest thing I've read in a long time. Thanks for that!


Agree with everyone here. Spielberg definitely had his hands on this film more than he or anyone behind the film will ever admit. Also agree that "II" and "III" were awful.
Old 11-01-02 | 04:14 PM
  #19  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Houston, TX
Is this the same E! special that talked about the "Curse Of Poltergeist?" The show really creeped me out. So many bad things happened throughout the production, I was shocked.
Old 11-01-02 | 07:13 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: San Leandro , CA
I enjoyed the special but it did seem apparent that Spielberg had a little too much power on the set.
This is exactly why I suspect that Spielberg pulled plans for the Special Editon that was to be released this year. Too bad. One of my favorite movies. They could even put the E! Special on there.


Great to see Craig and Jobeth interviewed. Wonder what happend to the Male Freeling kid?

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.