Video Convertors?
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: South Korea
Video Convertors?
I just went into world-import.com and it says a PAL/NTSC convertor is better than having a DVD player with a built-in one:
http://world-import.com/info.htm#dvd-pal-to-ntsc
I also read that not having an HDTV will impair the playability of a PAL DVD on an NTSC TV.
Insights, anyone? Thanks.
http://world-import.com/info.htm#dvd-pal-to-ntsc
I also read that not having an HDTV will impair the playability of a PAL DVD on an NTSC TV.
Insights, anyone? Thanks.
#2
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NJ
It may be true that a stand-alone video converter would be better than a built-in one, i personally never used a stand-alone one, so can't tell you my experience.
I think mainly what they are talking about it how some converters (especially ones built-in to players) don't properly convert the picture and don't offer scaling. Most of the available PAL > NTSC players aren't perfect, though there are some that are great. You just have to do your research before you buy one. I personally have a JVC SA602 (i think thats the correct model #, I'm at work and can't double check it) and a CyberHome 500. Both do perfect PAL > NTSC conversion, no problems what so ever. I think some of the cheaper players with it built in like some Malatas, Sampos and Apexs warp the picture.
The HDTV thing I never heard though, so I don't know. I have a regular TV and, once again, have had no problems playing my PAL discs.
I think mainly what they are talking about it how some converters (especially ones built-in to players) don't properly convert the picture and don't offer scaling. Most of the available PAL > NTSC players aren't perfect, though there are some that are great. You just have to do your research before you buy one. I personally have a JVC SA602 (i think thats the correct model #, I'm at work and can't double check it) and a CyberHome 500. Both do perfect PAL > NTSC conversion, no problems what so ever. I think some of the cheaper players with it built in like some Malatas, Sampos and Apexs warp the picture.
The HDTV thing I never heard though, so I don't know. I have a regular TV and, once again, have had no problems playing my PAL discs.
#3
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: The Sky Above PA
Originally posted by fnordboy
I think some of the cheaper players with it built in like some Malatas, Sampos and Apexs warp the picture....
I think some of the cheaper players with it built in like some Malatas, Sampos and Apexs warp the picture....
#4
DVD Talk Hero
Originally posted by lostatmidnight
Malata's do a flawless job of translating PAL. With the X/Y scaling option, there is also the ability to fine tune the picture, if need be. And I would not consider them 'cheap' either. I don't know how their newer models are, but I---and a lot of others on this board--own the N966 model which is an incredible progressive scan, all region NTSC/PAL converting player.
Malata's do a flawless job of translating PAL. With the X/Y scaling option, there is also the ability to fine tune the picture, if need be. And I would not consider them 'cheap' either. I don't know how their newer models are, but I---and a lot of others on this board--own the N966 model which is an incredible progressive scan, all region NTSC/PAL converting player.
#5
DVD Talk Limited Edition
I have an old video converter that I used to use to convert PAL tapes to NTSC. It did a respectable job.
When I got into DVD and bought the Apex, I found that the converter only did a so-so almost VHS quality conversion (but still better than the APEX conversion.
The Malata, Cyberhome and certain JVC players have elminated the need for a separate converter.
When I got into DVD and bought the Apex, I found that the converter only did a so-so almost VHS quality conversion (but still better than the APEX conversion.
The Malata, Cyberhome and certain JVC players have elminated the need for a separate converter.
#6
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NJ
Originally posted by movielib
Correct. It is wrong to group Malatas with those others that do not do the conversion correctly. (I have the Malata 996 also, as well as a Cyber Home 500 I just bought.)
Correct. It is wrong to group Malatas with those others that do not do the conversion correctly. (I have the Malata 996 also, as well as a Cyber Home 500 I just bought.)
. I remember reading of problems with some Malatas, maybe I am imagining that.
#7
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: USA
None of the convertors can convert PAL to NTSC nearly as well as the Mediamatics chip equiped DVD players. No contest, people. Don't throw good money away.
#8
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: The Sky Above PA
Originally posted by codefree
Comments like these always give me a good laugh. Have you tried any PAL animation on your Malata yet? My N996 makes the R2 Family Guy and South Park discs look like rubbish.
Comments like these always give me a good laugh. Have you tried any PAL animation on your Malata yet? My N996 makes the R2 Family Guy and South Park discs look like rubbish.
#9
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: USA
The PAL animation is video encoded, which gives the Malata hickups. It is good at converting FILM encoded PAL DVD's. Thankfully very few titles are encoded as Video.
The Cyberhome 500 is better at Video encoded PAL, but the tradeoff's are there. Look up the threads at the Nerd-Out forum for answers on that.
The Cyberhome 500 is better at Video encoded PAL, but the tradeoff's are there. Look up the threads at the Nerd-Out forum for answers on that.




