Do Blu-ray actually do more harm than good?
#51
DVD Talk Godfather
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,857
Received 1,740 Likes
on
1,397 Posts
From: Home of 2013 NFL champion Seahawks
Re: Do Blu-ray actually do more harm than good?
From what I have read, DVD had it sales peak in 2004, obviously before the introduction of Blu-ray.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014...06440621142958
Also, I found this sales chart that shows that after 2004, sales of packaged media did begin to "soften":
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014...06440621142958
Also, I found this sales chart that shows that after 2004, sales of packaged media did begin to "soften":
#52
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: Do Blu-ray actually do more harm than good?
EDIT: Reviewing that first consumer player released in 2003, if Wikipedia is correct:
The first consumer device arrived in stores on April 10, 2003: the Sony BDZ-S77, a $3,800 (US) BD-RE recorder that was made available only in Japan.[17] But there was no standard for prerecorded video, and no movies were released for this player. Hollywood studios insisted that players be equipped with digital rights management before they would release movies for the new format, and they wanted a new DRM system that would be more secure than the failed Content Scramble System (CSS) used on DVDs.
Also, the final Blu-ray specification itself wasn't completed until early 2006:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/01...ray_spec_done/
Of course I admit that like all consumer products, research and development was done long before the first consumer Blu-ray player was actually released, but by the time the first Blu-ray player was released in mid-2006 there were signs that DVD sales were beginning to slightly soften, which was a major concern to studios.
Last edited by Sub-Zero; 03-21-16 at 07:00 PM.
#53
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: Do Blu-ray actually do more harm than good?
Of course in the corporate world, sales leveling-off is a euphemism for "the sky is falling", even if it is still a multi-billion dollar business.
#54
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Do Blu-ray actually do more harm than good?
There have been two formats called "Blu-ray." The first was a recordable disc released in Japan in the early 2000s. It was largely a failure, but the name was recycled for the precorded Blu-ray format we know today, which was launched in 2006.
#55
DVD Talk Godfather
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,857
Received 1,740 Likes
on
1,397 Posts
From: Home of 2013 NFL champion Seahawks
Re: Do Blu-ray actually do more harm than good?
EDIT: Reviewing that first consumer player released in 2003, if Wikipedia is correct:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-ray#History_2
Also, the final Blu-ray specification itself wasn't completed until early 2006:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/01...ray_spec_done/
Of course I admit that like all consumer products, research and development was done long before the first consumer Blu-ray player was actually released, but by the time the first Blu-ray player was released in mid-2006 there were signs that DVD sales were beginning to slightly soften, which was a major concern to studios.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-ray#History_2
Also, the final Blu-ray specification itself wasn't completed until early 2006:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/01...ray_spec_done/
Of course I admit that like all consumer products, research and development was done long before the first consumer Blu-ray player was actually released, but by the time the first Blu-ray player was released in mid-2006 there were signs that DVD sales were beginning to slightly soften, which was a major concern to studios.

I disagree. New titles don't sell as well as they used to. Many people are content to wait till they can stream it for "free."
#56
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: Do Blu-ray actually do more harm than good?
I completely agree that Blu-ray was not created strictly as a reaction to media sales after 2004, as Blu-ray was obviously being developed by that point. What I did say was that by the time Blu-ray was actually released in mid-2006, DVD sales had been "softening" for nearly two years by that point, and as a result, the decline in DVD sales would have been a factor in the decision to actually release Blu-ray in 2006.
#57
DVD Talk Godfather
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,857
Received 1,740 Likes
on
1,397 Posts
From: Home of 2013 NFL champion Seahawks
Re: Do Blu-ray actually do more harm than good?
I completely agree that Blu-ray was not created strictly as a reaction to media sales after 2004, as Blu-ray was obviously being developed by that point. What I did say was that by the time Blu-ray was actually released in mid-2006, DVD sales had been "softening" for nearly two years by that point, and as a result, the decline in DVD sales would have been a factor in the decision to actually release Blu-ray in 2006.
#58
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Re: Do Blu-ray actually do more harm than good?
Bluray only really started being developed after the blue laser patent disputes were settled.
http://optics.org/article/9657
https://web.archive.org/web/20130420...ngineer05.html




