The Curse of Frankenstein, and other Hammers
#1
Thread Starter
Cool New Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Curse of Frankenstein, and other Hammers
Is it worthwhile to upgrade The Curse of Frankenstein DVD and get the Blu-ray? Some say it isn't very good. But it includes an uncropped version.
The Hammer Horror DVDs are pretty heavily cropped to wide screen format. Whether or not they were originally shown that way in the theatres, I still prefer a higher format, so that interesting information and the top of heads are not cut off.
The Hammer Horror DVDs are pretty heavily cropped to wide screen format. Whether or not they were originally shown that way in the theatres, I still prefer a higher format, so that interesting information and the top of heads are not cut off.
#2
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Curse of Frankenstein, and other Hammers
The Hammers have been a very mixed bag so far on Blu-ray. TCOF wouldn't be the first Hammer I'd upgrade on BD.
#3
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: The Curse of Frankenstein, and other Hammers
I assume we're talking about the U. K. version and not a Warner release that flew under the radar. It's probably worth buying for the extras alone but it's not a high quality upgrade. I would hope that Warner would release a higher quality disc but I'm starting to wonder if they even care.
#6
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: The Curse of Frankenstein, and other Hammers
I assume we're talking about the U. K. version and not a Warner release that flew under the radar. It's probably worth buying for the extras alone but it's not a high quality upgrade. I would hope that Warner would release a higher quality disc but I'm starting to wonder if they even care.
#7
Thread Starter
Cool New Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Curse of Frankenstein, and other Hammers
Yes, I think there is only a UK version.
Not sure what you mean by "flat" Hans, but it was shot in a full format (square, or 1.33:1, or whatever the camera light entrance was). Then it seems it was masked haphazardly to widescreen by the projectors in the theatres, and there is no definite "correct" aspect ratio for it. Personally I prefer to see all of the picture, unmasked.
Not sure what you mean by "flat" Hans, but it was shot in a full format (square, or 1.33:1, or whatever the camera light entrance was). Then it seems it was masked haphazardly to widescreen by the projectors in the theatres, and there is no definite "correct" aspect ratio for it. Personally I prefer to see all of the picture, unmasked.
#8
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: The Curse of Frankenstein, and other Hammers
Sounds like one of those open matte situations in which nobody can agree on the "correct" aspect ratio.
All I know is that my DVDs look fine, with no hugely obvious or obnoxious cropping.
All I know is that my DVDs look fine, with no hugely obvious or obnoxious cropping.
#9
Thread Starter
Cool New Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Curse of Frankenstein, and other Hammers
The Blu-ray disc includes both widescreen version and uncropped version. One reviewer said that the uncropped version looks higher quality upgrade. But I have a suspicion that this might be merely fancy, because the dimensions of every detail in the widescreen is larger, since the picture reaches all the way out to left and right on the screen, therefore making imperfections more easily noticeable.




