Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
#26
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
Well, if it's in 70mm, then you should be more excited about the big screen, but if it's projected video ala 'Taxi Driver', then get excited about buying the Blu-ray and watching at home.
#27
Moderator
Re: Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
and for the record the 'Taxi Driver' presentation was 4K DCP release - not projected video.
#28
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#29
Moderator
Re: Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
yes, but it's more commonly referred to as 'digital projection' ... say projected video and you run the risk of confusing people that it a bluray or worse, DVD being thrown onto the screen, which some theaters have been known to do.
#30
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
So, if Levi's are more commonly referred to as jeans, it's inaccurate to call them pants?
#31
Moderator
#32
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
I know at least one person in the industry who objects to the description of digital photography or digital projection as "video." While it may sound like semantics to us, there are technically a lot of differences between the two. Calling it "data" is more accurate.
#33
DVD Talk Godfather
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,857
Received 1,740 Likes
on
1,397 Posts
From: Home of 2013 NFL champion Seahawks
#34
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 20,052
Received 169 Likes
on
127 Posts
From: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
Re: Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
I'll wait for the reviews on this one, and since all home video reivews now completely suck I'll wait to hear the chatter on the forums and I'll especially wait to hear what Robert A Harris has to say.
After buying this twice on DVD I don't think I'll upgrade at all. I swore long ago that you really can't do the film any justice at home. I have an 84" screen and it still doesn't look like it should. It really must be seen on the big screen.
#35
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 20,052
Received 169 Likes
on
127 Posts
From: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
Re: Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
Found this quoted over at IMDb:
Why fix it? It's part of the actual photography of the film. We're going way past restoration and into recreation. Disney is apparently "fixing" 20,000 Leagues to "fix" some artifacts created by early anamorphic lenses. What's wrong with these restoration people?
Lawrence of Arabia which had been scanned in at 8K resolution (to ensure the highest capture of detail from the film’s large-format 65mm negative) and then taken down to 4K for the workflow, was even more revealing. A close-up of Peter O’Toole’s face jumped off the screen compared with the earlier 2K master, thanks to the more detailed texture of his skin and the sharper reproduction of the layer of dust partially coating his face. A longer shot from Lawrence that was also taken in the desert showed a series of fine concentric lines near the top of the frame in a pattern reminiscent of a fingerprint. These, (Grover) Crisp explained, are cracks in the film emulsion caused by its melting in the desert heart and then healing over. The Lines have always been there in the negative and result in an unusual rippling artifact when viewing the movie, but until now there hasn’t been a way to fix it. We’ve never been able to see this kind of detail before – it’s always been kind of submerged, he says, but now with this 8K scan it’s more obvious, Sony commissioned a third party to develop software to minimize or eliminate this distracting artifact for the restored version, which is due out on blu-ray and in theaters later this year
- Home Theater (February 2012 Vol. 19 No. 2) “Hollywood the 4K Way” by Rob Sabin
- Home Theater (February 2012 Vol. 19 No. 2) “Hollywood the 4K Way” by Rob Sabin
#36
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
I don't understand how these lines would be more "obvious" after an 8K scan than they would be from the original 65mm film when new - the film is a much higher resolution.
#37
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
I saw the film in 70mm in 1989 as a kid, and haven't seen it since (pointless on a television), so I'm looking forward to the theatrical revival. I'll probably hold off on the Blu-ray until I upgrade my 50-inch plasma to a 65, hopefully next year, funds permitting.
#38
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
It isn't, actually. There's not a lot of spatial resolution difference between an 8K scan and what's likely on the negative. Meanwhile, there's a very big difference between that scan and what you would see on a 70mm print in even the best of circumstances.
#39
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Long Island NY
Re: Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
Actually if I take Sony's track record into account I have every reason to doubt the quality of the Blu. Their first release of Lawrence on DVD was crummy, only on the Superbit did they do a proper job with the colors, then the Superbit disapeard and for years they've only sold a one disc barebones version of the original crummy transfer.
I'll wait for the reviews on this one, and since all home video reivews now completely suck I'll wait to hear the chatter on the forums and I'll especially wait to hear what Robert A Harris has to say.
After buying this twice on DVD I don't think I'll upgrade at all. I swore long ago that you really can't do the film any justice at home. I have an 84" screen and it still doesn't look like it should. It really must be seen on the big screen.
I'll wait for the reviews on this one, and since all home video reivews now completely suck I'll wait to hear the chatter on the forums and I'll especially wait to hear what Robert A Harris has to say.
After buying this twice on DVD I don't think I'll upgrade at all. I swore long ago that you really can't do the film any justice at home. I have an 84" screen and it still doesn't look like it should. It really must be seen on the big screen.
Now, having seen a projected 70mm print of LOA on a large screen, if you are saying that ANY home video experience of this film is likely a compromise, I'll certainly agree with that. Considering the rarity of such theatrical viewings though, a BD of comparable quality to their best previous efforts is welcome to me, so that I'll be able to freely watch this movie at least a few more times before shuffling off the mortal coil.
#40
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Long Island NY
Re: Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
Found this quoted over at IMDb:
Why fix it? It's part of the actual photography of the film. We're going way past restoration and into recreation. Disney is apparently "fixing" 20,000 Leagues to "fix" some artifacts created by early anamorphic lenses. What's wrong with these restoration people?
Why fix it? It's part of the actual photography of the film. We're going way past restoration and into recreation. Disney is apparently "fixing" 20,000 Leagues to "fix" some artifacts created by early anamorphic lenses. What's wrong with these restoration people?
I know of the marks on the image they are talking about; they were readily visible in the 70mm screening and on the old DVD. But they do not result from a photographic process; they result from damage to the film. It's fine with me if they leave them in; if they fix it and do a crappy job of it, I won't be happy. But if they fix it and do a good job of it, I won't complain.
Removing anamorphic artifacts is more troubling to me, since these are due to the actual photographic process.
#42
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
When Robert Harris was restoring "Lawrence of Arabia" several years ago he asked David Lean whether he wanted him to try to fix the thermal damage. After some thought, Lean said they should leave it alone. I believe it's discussed in the documentary on the DVD.
#43
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Long Island NY
Re: Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
Haven't watched that documentary in ages. If Lean wanted the damage to remain, that's good enough for me.
#44
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
#45
DVD Talk Legend
#46
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
No, he wanted it to remain because it was part of the history of the film and what they went through to make it.
#47
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#49
Moderator
Re: Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
#50
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Long Island NY
Re: Lawrence of Arabia - FINALLY arrives...
Yes, I never claimed they were perfect...I said the same thing when you posted this exact comment in the Monty Python thread...
Doesn't change my perception that they are the best of the majors. I wish I were happy with 90% of my Universal discs, like I am with Sony.
Doesn't change my perception that they are the best of the majors. I wish I were happy with 90% of my Universal discs, like I am with Sony.



