Drive - 1/31/12
02-04-12 | 03:37 PM
#51
Banned
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: Drive - 1/31/12
Browsed the Drive thread on bluray.com...wow are they fucked up over there...anyway...found this. Looks soooo much better than the standard one. Also....they mentioned Epson glossy paper.
02-04-12 | 05:15 PM
#54
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Drive - 1/31/12
Actually, that's what it looks like on a computer.
Had to bust your balls a little.
I'd like to print it sometime. I've got the file sitting on my PC.
Had to bust your balls a little.
I'd like to print it sometime. I've got the file sitting on my PC.
02-04-12 | 06:04 PM
#55
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Cabo Wabo
Re: Drive - 1/31/12
Will Office Max or any place like that print that out for you on the right kind of paper? I don't have a printer and was just wondering if you or anyone else might know. Thanks
02-04-12 | 06:15 PM
#56
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
From: Sitting on a beach, earning 20%
Re: Drive - 1/31/12
Office Max and Kinkos won't officially print it, since that would be reproducing copyrighted images without permission.
Yes, you can say the artist allowed its use, but to the clerk it'll just look like you're making a bootleg cover. Even if there's no profit motive, the right to reproduce the art is the point, not the money. Then there's also the grey area of whether or not the artist had permission to use photo stills, which I doubt.
Note that I said "officially". You may get a clerk who doesn't know/care, or a manager who's happy for business, any business.
Yes, you can say the artist allowed its use, but to the clerk it'll just look like you're making a bootleg cover. Even if there's no profit motive, the right to reproduce the art is the point, not the money. Then there's also the grey area of whether or not the artist had permission to use photo stills, which I doubt.
Note that I said "officially". You may get a clerk who doesn't know/care, or a manager who's happy for business, any business.
02-04-12 | 06:33 PM
#57
Re: Drive - 1/31/12
We finally see this tonight at home. Sure hope that it lives up to the hype, because we recently went with friends to the theater to catch The Descendants and it didn't.
02-04-12 | 07:33 PM
#58
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Cabo Wabo
Re: Drive - 1/31/12
Office Max and Kinkos won't officially print it, since that would be reproducing copyrighted images without permission.
Yes, you can say the artist allowed its use, but to the clerk it'll just look like you're making a bootleg cover. Even if there's no profit motive, the right to reproduce the art is the point, not the money. Then there's also the grey area of whether or not the artist had permission to use photo stills, which I doubt.
Note that I said "officially". You may get a clerk who doesn't know/care, or a manager who's happy for business, any business.
Yes, you can say the artist allowed its use, but to the clerk it'll just look like you're making a bootleg cover. Even if there's no profit motive, the right to reproduce the art is the point, not the money. Then there's also the grey area of whether or not the artist had permission to use photo stills, which I doubt.
Note that I said "officially". You may get a clerk who doesn't know/care, or a manager who's happy for business, any business.
02-04-12 | 08:50 PM
#59
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Atlanta, GA
Re: Drive - 1/31/12
02-05-12 | 11:25 AM
#60
TOTY Winner 2018 and Inane Thread Master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 54,117
Received 1,721 Likes
on
1,411 Posts
From: "Are any of us really anywhere?"
Re: Drive - 1/31/12
mine didn't come out too bad!
