Wait, why does Buffy the Vampire Slayer (y'know, the movie) look this great?
Subscribe
#1
Adam Tyner , 10-25-11 10:55 PM
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Adam Tyner
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
close
- Join DateSep 1999
- LocationGreenville, South Cackalack
- Posts:31,728
Received 2,823 Likes
on
1,873 Posts
I bought Buffy at Wal-Mart for ten bucks and wasn't expecting much, but...holy mother of something, Fox really ponied up for a world-class remaster.
Okay, okay, the flashbacks are soft and grainy, and the film stock doesn't hold up well under low light. Geez, though, when the sun's out, Buffy the Vampire Slayer is honestly one of the absolute best looking catalog titles I've seen in HD...and I've seen a lot! There's a scene kinda early on where the girls are chatting outside the school, and it's reference quality: absurdly sharp and detailed, and those garish Kris Kross-era neon colors leap right off the screen.
It's been remixed to 7.1 too.
I still don't...like the movie all that much, but geez, it really is gorgeous.
Okay, okay, the flashbacks are soft and grainy, and the film stock doesn't hold up well under low light. Geez, though, when the sun's out, Buffy the Vampire Slayer is honestly one of the absolute best looking catalog titles I've seen in HD...and I've seen a lot! There's a scene kinda early on where the girls are chatting outside the school, and it's reference quality: absurdly sharp and detailed, and those garish Kris Kross-era neon colors leap right off the screen.
It's been remixed to 7.1 too.
I still don't...like the movie all that much, but geez, it really is gorgeous.
#2
Looks like i'll need to watch this soon. Figured it would be a typical crap release.
#3
asianxcore , 10-26-11 01:10 AM
DVD Talk Legend
asianxcore
DVD Talk Legend
close
- Join DateJan 2004
- LocationCalifornia
- Posts:20,841
Received 443 Likes
on
366 Posts
Quote:
Same here! I saw it along with The Crow at Walmart and thought they were rushed releases.Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
Looks like i'll need to watch this soon. Figured it would be a typical crap release.
Looks like I might have to go back and pick up Buffy on BD.
#4
PhantomStranger , 10-26-11 01:40 AM
DVD Talk Hero
PhantomStranger
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateFeb 2007
- LocationThe Phantom Zone
- Posts:29,323
Received 1,220 Likes
on
1,019 Posts
It sells quite well for a catalog property, ever since the television show became a monster hit. I think a lot of casual buyers pick it up thinking it has something to do with the Sarah Michelle Gellar version.
#5
The Monkees , 10-26-11 11:51 PM
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Quote:
It was, because that movie IS crap!Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
Looks like i'll need to watch this soon. Figured it would be a typical crap release.
#6
TheMovieman , 10-27-11 12:58 AM
DVD Talk Legend
TheMovieman
DVD Talk Legend
close
- Join DateJan 2006
- LocationOregon
- Posts:13,607
Received 306 Likes
on
246 Posts
Quote:
Okay, okay, the flashbacks are soft and grainy, and the film stock doesn't hold up well under low light. Geez, though, when the sun's out, Buffy the Vampire Slayer is honestly one of the absolute best looking catalog titles I've seen in HD...and I've seen a lot! There's a scene kinda early on where the girls are chatting outside the school, and it's reference quality: absurdly sharp and detailed, and those garish Kris Kross-era neon colors leap right off the screen.
It's been remixed to 7.1 too.
I still don't...like the movie all that much, but geez, it really is gorgeous.
Good to hear (read). I also picked it for $10 at Wal Mart (along with Don't Say a Word and Hide and Seek) so glad it's solid release.Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
I bought Buffy at Wal-Mart for ten bucks and wasn't expecting much, but...holy mother of something, Fox really ponied up for a world-class remaster.Okay, okay, the flashbacks are soft and grainy, and the film stock doesn't hold up well under low light. Geez, though, when the sun's out, Buffy the Vampire Slayer is honestly one of the absolute best looking catalog titles I've seen in HD...and I've seen a lot! There's a scene kinda early on where the girls are chatting outside the school, and it's reference quality: absurdly sharp and detailed, and those garish Kris Kross-era neon colors leap right off the screen.
It's been remixed to 7.1 too.
I still don't...like the movie all that much, but geez, it really is gorgeous.
#7
Nick Martin , 10-27-11 02:12 AM
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
I don't care how great the film looks or sounds, I'm not going near it again!
All I can do is hold out minute, pointless, sliver of a sense of hope that one day a thread will be started with the title "Wait, why does Buffy the Vampire Slayer (y'know, the TV series) look this great?" on Blu-ray.
Of course I'd figure Angel would look even better considering how it was shot but you get the idea.
All I can do is hold out minute, pointless, sliver of a sense of hope that one day a thread will be started with the title "Wait, why does Buffy the Vampire Slayer (y'know, the TV series) look this great?" on Blu-ray.
Of course I'd figure Angel would look even better considering how it was shot but you get the idea.

#8
Spottedfeather , 10-27-11 02:30 AM
Banned
It can't possibly be as bad as the transfer of Secret Of NIMH.
#9
When I read the thread title I thought you were referring to Kristy Swanson.
#10
I know that Blu-ray.com doesn't always do the best job of reviewing things, but they gave the Video a 3.5/5 I believe.
#11
riotinmyskull , 10-27-11 10:42 AM
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
are people complaining about a catalog title getting a decent transfer? i'm confused.
#12
islandclaws , 10-27-11 10:58 AM
DVD Talk Legend
This is a surprise? Fox routinely provides stellar transfers for some of their shittiest releases.
#13
RocShemp , 10-27-11 11:02 AM
DVD Talk Hero
RocShemp
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateMay 2001
- Posts:42,224
Received 1,469 Likes
on
1,144 Posts
Quote:
Fans of the show are bitching the movie exists. I like this flick so I'm glad it got a good transfer. I may pick it up now, if I find a copy. Originally Posted by riotinmyskull
are people complaining about a catalog title getting a decent transfer? i'm confused.

#14
Nick Martin , 10-27-11 12:55 PM
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Quote:
I can't speak for anyone else but the reason I did not watch the show at all when it premiered was because of the assumption the movie and the show were the same and the movie sucked (pardon the pun). Therefore I didn't know a thing about the show and how different it was.Originally Posted by RocShemp
Fans of the show are bitching the movie exists. I like this flick so I'm glad it got a good transfer. I may pick it up now, if I find a copy.
#15
clckworang , 10-27-11 01:16 PM
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
clckworang
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
close
- Join DateNov 2003
- LocationThe toe nail of Texas
- Posts:9,776
Received 894 Likes
on
568 Posts
Quote:
I tuned out the first season the show was on because I had no interest in watching a serialized version of the movie. The only reason I started watching in season 2 was because of the praise it received. Fortunately, WB re-aired the first season during season 2, so I was able to quickly catch up. Originally Posted by Nick Martin
I can't speak for anyone else but the reason I did not watch the show at all when it premiered was because of the assumption the movie and the show were the same and the movie sucked (pardon the pun). Therefore I didn't know a thing about the show and how different it was.

#16
The movie is one of my admitted guilty pleasures. Was happy to find out this came out and Fox gave it a bit of love. Keep the good catalog releases coming!
#17
Adam Tyner , 10-27-11 04:12 PM
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Adam Tyner
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
close
- Join DateSep 1999
- LocationGreenville, South Cackalack
- Posts:31,728
Received 2,823 Likes
on
1,873 Posts
Quote:
I'm not complaining. Just surprised. This is clearly a brand new transfer, and some money went into making it look and sound as great as it can.Originally Posted by riotinmyskull
are people complaining about a catalog title getting a decent transfer? i'm confused.
[Edited to add -- Oh, I didn't realize there was a re-release of the movie on DVD last year. That explains it. ]
#18
Nick Martin , 10-27-11 09:05 PM
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Quote:
Re-released with a Twilight-esque cover, which the Blu-ray re-used. Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
[Edited to add -- Oh, I didn't realize there was a re-release of the movie on DVD last year. That explains it. ]
In the UK complete series sets of both Buffy and ANGEL are getting Twilight-style cover re-designs as well. Only a matter of time before that happens here.
#19
RocShemp , 10-28-11 09:44 AM
DVD Talk Hero
RocShemp
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateMay 2001
- Posts:42,224
Received 1,469 Likes
on
1,144 Posts
I liked the movie because, although very stupid, it seems gleefully so. In fact, the reason I gave up on the series was because (although ocassionally funny) it took the goofy premise far too serious for my liking. Same when I caught reruns of Angel some years later. I liked the goofy episodes but was bored to tears whenever the show got serious.

That is an aweful cover!
Quote:
In the UK complete series sets of both Buffy and ANGEL are getting Twilight-style cover re-designs as well. Only a matter of time before that happens here.
Originally Posted by Nick Martin
Re-released with a Twilight-esque cover, which the Blu-ray re-used. In the UK complete series sets of both Buffy and ANGEL are getting Twilight-style cover re-designs as well. Only a matter of time before that happens here.

That is an aweful cover!
#20
davidh777 , 10-29-11 06:43 PM
DVD Talk Godfather
davidh777
DVD Talk Godfather
close
- Join DateOct 2003
- LocationHome of 2013 NFL champion Seahawks
- Posts:57,854
Received 1,740 Likes
on
1,397 Posts
Quote:

That is an aweful cover!
Originally Posted by RocShemp
I liked the movie because, although very stupid, it seems gleefully so. In fact, the reason I gave up on the series was because (although ocassionally funny) it took the goofy premise far too serious for my liking. Same when I caught reruns of Angel some years later. I liked the goofy episodes but was bored to tears whenever the show got serious.
That is an aweful cover!
Reminds me of the crappy Near Dark cover
#21
RocShemp , 10-29-11 09:50 PM
DVD Talk Hero
RocShemp
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateMay 2001
- Posts:42,224
Received 1,469 Likes
on
1,144 Posts
Quote:
Reminds me of the crappy Near Dark cover
Dear Lord! It may actually be worse! Originally Posted by davidh777
Reminds me of the crappy Near Dark cover


#22
Spottedfeather , 10-30-11 03:08 PM
Banned
That cover's a whole lot worse than the actual movie cover. What was wrong with Kristy just standing there ?
The original cover puts you in the frame of mind of the silliness of the movie. The new one makes it look like a serious movie, which it isn't.

The original cover puts you in the frame of mind of the silliness of the movie. The new one makes it look like a serious movie, which it isn't.
#23
Adam Tyner , 10-30-11 03:26 PM
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Adam Tyner
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
close
- Join DateSep 1999
- LocationGreenville, South Cackalack
- Posts:31,728
Received 2,823 Likes
on
1,873 Posts
Quote:
I'm pretty sure that's the point of the cover change, though. :-/Originally Posted by Spottedfeather
The new one makes it look like a serious movie, which it isn't.
#24
notkevinbacon , 10-30-11 04:24 PM
Senior Member
Quote:

That is an aweful cover!
Originally Posted by RocShemp
I liked the movie because, although very stupid, it seems gleefully so. In fact, the reason I gave up on the series was because (although ocassionally funny) it took the goofy premise far too serious for my liking. Same when I caught reruns of Angel some years later. I liked the goofy episodes but was bored to tears whenever the show got serious.
That is an aweful cover!

I always thought it looked exactly like the An American Werewolf in London BD
#25
MTRodaba2468 , 10-30-11 08:06 PM
DVD Talk Gold Edition
My girlfriend absolutely loves this movie, so it's been on her radar. Seeing that the Blu-Ray actually looks quite good is just another benefit...