![]() |
Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
................
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
:drool:
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Oh grand, a re-release.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
I'll trust that if SK cut it, it doesn't belong
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Amazing stuff. Although I have a hunch that if this footage does see the light of day, it will be presented separately as deleted scenes. I read quite a few times that Kubrick thought it was boring, and was perfectly happy with it cut out.
This would be a quad dip for me, as I already own the 1st Warner release, the 2nd remastering, and the HD-DVD. I haven't gotten rid of the 1st Warner yet, because it has a classic interview with Arthur C. Clarke, which I don't believe was carried over to any other editions. And I can't get rid of my Kubrick set yet, because Barry Lyndon and Lolita aren't yet in High Def. |
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
If Kubrick was the one to cut it then it belongs outside of the film. There's a reason why this film is as loved as it is all these years later.
On another note, I don't really see the point to a re-release on Blu-ray just so that people can see deleted footage Kubrick didn't want us to see at all. |
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Curious to see the extra footage but probably not enough to buy again.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by mhanlen1
(Post 10543619)
And I can't get rid of my Kubrick set yet, because Barry Lyndon and Lolita aren't yet in High Def.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
interesting find...I'm sure it won't get inserted cuz if SK cut it...it wasn't worth having in the film. BUT...I'd like to see wtf he did cut out.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
(Post 10543605)
Oh grand, a re-release.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Same here. but there's no need at all to change what Kubrick perfected. Additional deleted scenes are fine as a supplement, but don't alter the movie.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by trespoochies
(Post 10543841)
there's no need at all to change what Kubrick perfected. Additional deleted scenes are fine as a supplement, but don't alter the movie.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
I'm intrigued by new footage but apprehensive over the content. What if it's 17 more minutes of "going through the star gate" footage?
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
I believe this new release would be the original Roadshow Picture release - a longer version that played in selected theatre back in its original run.
So this doesnt necessarily mean Kubrick cut the footage. The Roadshow edition could have been the actual Director's Cut and what we have is the version the studio forced to be shorter... So I can't wait to get my hands on this! I hope the transfer is also improved. Glad I didnt get the BR yet....so this won't be a double-dip for me. |
Originally Posted by TomOpus
(Post 10544052)
I'm intrigued by new footage but apprehensive over the content. What if it's 17 more minutes of "going through the star gate" footage?
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by lizard
(Post 10544122)
That would be my fear also.
HAL 9000 Honestly, Dave, I believe you are effectively throwing away a considerable asset. HAL 9000 (continued) I'd be happy to do your taxes, Dave... Dave? Bowman I'm not interested in that, HAL. HAL 9000 Please, Dave... just consider for a moment how efficiently I could organize your stamp collection. |
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
In his Great Movies article on 2001, Roger Ebert (who was at the first LA screening that showed the 17 minute longer version) said the cut footage included "a pod sequence that essentially repeated another one". Doesn't exactly speak to the quality of the deleted scenes, but it could be interesting as a bonus feature, I guess.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by IstvanTheHun
(Post 10544095)
I hope the transfer is also improved.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by TomOpus
(Post 10544156)
I thought the transfer on the blu-ray was exceptional. What was wrong with it?
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by sb5
(Post 10544154)
In his Great Movies article on 2001, Roger Ebert (who was at the first LA screening that showed the 17 minute longer version) said the cut footage included "a pod sequence that essentially repeated another one". Doesn't exactly speak to quality of the deleted scenes, but it could be interesting as a bonus feature, I guess.
Would love to see this additional footage :up: |
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by TomOpus
(Post 10544156)
I thought the transfer on the blu-ray was exceptional. What was wrong with it?
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
cool.. I don't own this movie on any format yet.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Oh good. Because whenever I watched 2001 before, I was saying "this is too short."
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Like most others, I'm curious to see the footage but I agree that it shouldn't be integrated back into the film. You just don't mess with Stanley's movies.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
AFAIK, Kubrick screened this cut at the premiere, discovered audiences found it boring, and subsequently cut the footage. I don't believe it ever ran that way in any kind of wide release. I'd like to see the footage, but it shouldn't be re-integrated into the film. 2001 is the best film ever made as it is now.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
(Post 10545637)
I'd like to see the footage, but it shouldn't be re-integrated into the film. 2001 is the best film ever made as it is now.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Define legitimate. People saw it in the theater and Kubrick immediately cut it. The studio didn't demand the cuts, and Kubrick never said it should be changed from its current form. If WB made it clear that this wasn't the way Kubrick intended the movie to be seen, then I guess it wouldn't be too awful if they made it available via seamless branching, although I'd hope they'd also offer them as deleted scenes.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
(Post 10545681)
Define legitimate. People saw it in the theater
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
(Post 10545681)
The studio didn't demand the cuts
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
The footage was cut between the premiere and general release. Unless there was a previous test screening, he might've used the premiere for that purpose. So, while "people" saw it in the theater, the general public saw the version we know today.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by Doctorossi
(Post 10545753)
I think you just answered your own question! :D
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
2001: A Space Odyssey is absolutely perfect as is. It doesn't need one frame added or excised. I'd be more interested in that documentary which apparently is no longer happening. :(
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
(Post 10545828)
2001: A Space Odyssey is absolutely perfect as is. It doesn't need one frame added or excised.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by Doctorossi
(Post 10545866)
It's fantastic, as is... but you haven't seen the other cut, have you?
There are few films that I'm an anal purist about, but "Bitanic" is one of them. |
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by Lemmy
(Post 10545865)
And I'd bet you're in a very small number of folks in that regard (critics, execs, etc.). Most people will never even be allowed to see an "alternate cut" in a theater. It's just something that's generally not made available to the public very often.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by Doctorossi
(Post 10545664)
Assuming it is a legitimate cut, why not give us both and let us decide?
On a personal level, I'm not much of a fan alternate versions that don't have the director's or main creative force's approval. I feel they cheapen the work of art. You either like what the artist presents or don't. It's really not that big of a deal to dislike it and move onto something else. The piece of art cannot speak for itself if it doesn't have a singular voice. It just feels weak. But that is up to the artist only. If they feel presenting multiple versions are fine, then release them. And I'm not even saying I like all director's cuts, but I really hate lack of integrity when it comes to art. Have a vision and produce it. I'm here do digest your work not make up your mind. If it sucks I'll find something else, there is plenty of it out there. |
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
(Post 10545871)
No, and that's not the point.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
(Post 10545877)
I'm just saying that just because a movie is shown to an audience in a theater doesn't mean it's considered a legitimate cut by the filmmakers.
|
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by Doctorossi
(Post 10545891)
Of course it's the point! How can you dismiss an unseen version? If additional material would provide no meaning for you, how can you derive meaning from any film footage?
More is not always better. It's a personal thing. In contrast, I'm not as bugfuck insistent about the newfound footage in "Metropolis". I'd go berserk if they fucked with Lang's "Woman in the Window" or "Scarlet Street" though... |
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
(Post 10545915)
I just don't think it belongs reinserted in the movie, one that has existed as Kubrick's final vision for the last 42 years.
Meanwhile, don't you understand how watching the additional footage in the context of the film might provide more insight (even if only on a subconscious level) into the making of the film (and the thought behind it) than would only being able to see the footage acontextually? And what would anyone have to lose by authoring the disc in a way that would allow viewers to watch this footage either way (cut in or on its own)? |
Re: Extended cut of 2001 may be coming soon!
Look...no matter what the inclusion of those scenes doesn't make it Kubrick's official cut. I want to see them, sure...why not? More stuff to see is cool. OFFER that alternate cut as whatever it was called...AND that TC. The TC is the one that will be held forever as the definitive cut. The possible inclusion of those scenes into it's own cut is fine. Don't just offer this alternate cut, that's not fucking cool. That's essentially erasing or covering what is history, in the sense that people who will only watch it, seeing as in this scenario, it may be the only cut included.
BEST case scenario is that we get the TC and this other cut (to see what it was like in context). Separately it'd also be cool to get them as a deleted scene option to evaluate the clips solely based based on themselves. Added w/ whatever other features we get. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.