Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

Blu-ray video quality lacking quality?

Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

Blu-ray video quality lacking quality?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-11 | 09:44 PM
  #26  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,079
Received 822 Likes on 575 Posts
Re: Blu-ray video quality lacking quality?

Originally Posted by orangerunner
I think studios have to balance the cost of remastering in HD, which is very expensive, to the public demand.

It's a double-edge sword because the demand for many potential Blu-ray catalogue titles just aren't there.
Well, there's always the other markets for HD video, such as broadcast and online streaming. These markets are going to grow.

Of course, there's always going to be progressively better transfering/mastering technology, so there's the question of how long an HD transfer is good for. Studios are doing 4K transfers now for downconverting to HD, but in 10 years will we be complaining on how some new releases are using a 4K transfer "from a decade ago"?
Old 05-14-11 | 03:23 PM
  #27  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,150
Received 221 Likes on 163 Posts
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Re: Blu-ray video quality lacking quality?

Originally Posted by Jay G.
Well, there's always the other markets for HD video, such as broadcast and online streaming. These markets are going to grow.

Of course, there's always going to be progressively better transfering/mastering technology, so there's the question of how long an HD transfer is good for. Studios are doing 4K transfers now for downconverting to HD, but in 10 years will we be complaining on how some new releases are using a 4K transfer "from a decade ago"?
It's a good point, there's no sense that technology is going to level out for a few years.

Few people are willing to get their feet wet and spend a lot of money on a technology that will be obsolete overnight and yet if no one buys it, it won't succeed in the marketplace.

Movie collections are carefully assembled over several years so people have much more of an emotional investment over their disc collection than a one-time purchase like the latest upgrade of their iPad, laptop or cellphone.
Old 05-14-11 | 08:22 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: The lonely depths of my mind
Re: Blu-ray video quality lacking quality?

The worst blu-ray that I've ever seen is Secret Of Nimh. The colours are fine. The grain is fine. The brightness is fine. But there seems to be a "grid" over the entire picture. Sort of like watching the movie through a fine screen. I don't remember the VHS looking like this. Or when I've ever seen it on tv. I think it all depends on how successful the movie was when it was released.
Old 05-15-11 | 09:55 AM
  #29  
JimRochester's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 18,057
Received 67 Likes on 30 Posts
From: Rochester, NY. USA
Re: Blu-ray video quality lacking quality?

I was very disappointed when I upgraded Total Recall and found the quality no better than the SD. Overall the BR offers an upgrade just some are less than others
Old 05-15-11 | 09:59 AM
  #30  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,113
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Nightmare Alley
Re: Blu-ray video quality lacking quality?

Dreamscape is definitely the worst Blu-ray I've watched, transfer-wise. Most of the time, I couldn't even tell I wasn't watched my old DVD.
Old 05-15-11 | 10:04 AM
  #31  
dsa_shea's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,281
Received 353 Likes on 253 Posts
From: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Re: Blu-ray video quality lacking quality?

Shittiest movie: Birdemic
Shittiest sound: Birdemic
Shittiest video: Birdemic

Triple Whammy!
Old 05-15-11 | 02:36 PM
  #32  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,150
Received 221 Likes on 163 Posts
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Re: Blu-ray video quality lacking quality?

Originally Posted by JimRochester
I was very disappointed when I upgraded Total Recall and found the quality no better than the SD. Overall the BR offers an upgrade just some are less than others
It's interesting you brought up Total Recall Blu-ray. I just bought the Total Recall/T2 combo pack for $9.99 and was disappointed as well.

T2 looked much better with a nice crisp picture but Total Recall basically looked the same as the DVD and came with less extras.

Not really worth the upgrade especially when you can't get rid of the DVD because of the extras and the extended version of T2 which aren't on Blu.
Old 05-15-11 | 02:47 PM
  #33  
PhantomStranger's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 29,288
Received 1,207 Likes on 1,010 Posts
From: The Phantom Zone
Re: Blu-ray video quality lacking quality?

99% of the HD transfers created before 2006/2007 are obsolete and should not be released on Blu-ray, but studios are being tighter than ever and using any HD master possible in some instances. We are now seeing the budget distributors like Mill Creek and Echo Bridge using very poor masters intended for cable broadcast on their Blu-rays.
Old 05-15-11 | 04:07 PM
  #34  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,915
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Orange County
Re: Blu-ray video quality lacking quality?

Originally Posted by NoirFan
Dreamscape is definitely the worst Blu-ray I've watched, transfer-wise. Most of the time, I couldn't even tell I wasn't watched my old DVD.
Someone more knowledgeable than me should start a thread listing BDs that are significantly worse in PQ than their DVD counterparts. Hoosiers is another title, for instance, that looks way worse in Blu than in DVD.
Old 05-15-11 | 04:28 PM
  #35  
Drexl's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 16,077
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
From: St. Louis, MO
Re: Blu-ray video quality lacking quality?

Although in some cases the benefit is more subtle, the only one that comes to mind which is actually worse is The French Connection, due to the color process Friedkin used on it.

DVD Beaver has a Hoosiers review, and I don't see how the BD isn't an improvement, although it does look washed out. I think if you adjusted your black level for this title it would be better than the DVD.
Old 05-15-11 | 06:21 PM
  #36  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,915
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Orange County
Re: Blu-ray video quality lacking quality?

Originally Posted by Drexl
DVD Beaver has a Hoosiers review, and I don't see how the BD isn't an improvement, although it does look washed out. I think if you adjusted your black level for this title it would be better than the DVD.
A worthless upgrade as the BD doesn't have any extras (versus the loaded DVD edition. Regarding PQ, I agree with DVDTalk's assessment:

The 1.85:1 transfer (encoded with MPEG 2 at 21 Mbps on a single layer disc) is a disappointment. A heavy layer of grain mars many scenes, depth and detail are lacking, and colors can be rather muted at times (only the gold uniforms of the Huskers have any real snap). You'd expect a next-gen transfer to, for lack of a better phrase, enhance the good and reduce the bad, but this particular transfer appears to simply exacerbate the flaws in the source elements. The video improves in the latter half of the film, especially during the game sequences (watch closely and you can actually see a spider crawling on the woodwork behind Hopper right before Hackman receives his first ejection), but by that point it's too little, too late.
/offtopic
Old 05-17-11 | 03:35 PM
  #37  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,602
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: Blu-ray video quality lacking quality?

Originally Posted by Drexl
Although in some cases the benefit is more subtle, the only one that comes to mind which is actually worse is The French Connection, due to the color process Friedkin used on it.

DVD Beaver has a Hoosiers review, and I don't see how the BD isn't an improvement, although it does look washed out. I think if you adjusted your black level for this title it would be better than the DVD.
Bought Hoosiers as an "Upgrade" to DVD, because I love the movie so much.

The price was only $7.99, so I picked it up.

I can tell an improvement in color and clarity, so I am happy with the purchase.

The film was shot with lots of grain, to give it an old feel to it - which I like.

Most BRs I will hold off buying until I read a great review on it, Hoosiers is never going to look any better than it does on BR and that's OK with me.

********************************

Most studios are not going to invest a ton of money in a movie that is old and not going to sell on boat of disks.

But, I do love Disney for taking the time and dollars to fix up their movies before they release them on BR. Beauty and the Beast is my DEMO disk for BR, the quality is WAY better than the original DVD. I will double dip for those titles that I love and that the movie studios put some real effort into them.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.