![]() |
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
Originally Posted by Steve Phillips
(Post 9643757)
I just don't understand how those who will be completely unaffected by this seem to be so concerned that it is happening- if you don't want 3-D, don't get a new TV, don't upgrade your player, and don't buy the glasses.
|
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
But is it more complex if you just ignore the whole thing?
As for 3-D being a novelty in the theatrical world, well of course, they are doing it to bring people in. If it stops working they will stop or move on to Holorama or whatever. But with 40 3-D features released in the past few years and that many more in the pipeline, the fact that they are making money, and the fact that some of Hollywood's biggest talent is now on board, it just makes sense for all of this product to be available in the its native format at home at some point. |
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
Originally Posted by Steve Phillips
(Post 9644464)
But is it more complex if you just ignore the whole thing?
As for 3-D being a novelty in the theatrical world, well of course, they are doing it to bring people in. |
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
Originally Posted by kefrank
(Post 9644940)
Think about it: someone buys a Blu-ray that has a 3D version on it and selects the 3D version from the menu, only to find that their BD player doesn't support it.
I'm not really against the tech, but IMO we don't need 3D jammed in the case with 2D. They can sell their 3D versions in a specialty section and charge whatever they like. |
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
Originally Posted by bunkaroo
(Post 9645306)
This brings up another question - does the 3D version have to be a separate encode? If so, will we see both 2D and 3D jammed on the same disc? This could compromise PQ/AQ for both versions. Two separate discs in the same case? Higher MSRP.
I'm not really against the tech, but IMO we don't need 3D jammed in the case with 2D. They can sell their 3D versions in a specialty section and charge whatever they like. Although, they could do them on separate discs in the same package, as they do now for 3D movies. I'd much rather have a real 3D version than a DVD or digital copy. |
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
Originally Posted by Drexl
(Post 9645358)
That's kind of what I was saying about the bitrates. Apparently the 3D version will require a separate image for each eye, and the 2D version would be one of those two encodes. And, both "eyes" would have to be in the same stream of up to 40Mbps. Ugh. Even if they have players that spin the discs faster, allowing for higher bitrates, I'm not sure if the discs would be compatible with current players.
Although, they could do them on separate discs in the same package, as they do now for 3D movies. I'd much rather have a real 3D version than a DVD or digital copy. |
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
Originally Posted by AmityBoatTours
(Post 9642795)
First off i have to say thank god, the mods let me i switch my screen name shortly i signed up here and people mistook me for you since the screen name was so close. cause i definately do not want to be confused with you after reading your totally misinformed posts on the history of 3D and 35 mm film.
|
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
How was i rude? I didnt name call, I didnt give you an attitude. Just said "thank god the mods changed my screen name, cause i definately wouldnt want to be confused with you." after reading what was clearly a very innacurate post on the use of 3D in the 35mm format.
in anycase back on subject, Its pretty exciting that we will now be getting the option of having 3D Blu-ray in our homes in less than a years time. If you think thats rude you are welcome to ignore me.
Originally Posted by Blu Man
(Post 9645868)
You should seriously consider reading your own post. It's ok, we all mix up words sometimes, you just happen to more then others.-smile- Doesn't you signature saw that you would never be rude to someone who disagree's with you? Would you call the post i have quoted polite?
|
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
Something cool if you are in one of the few cities that has a D-Box equiped theatre.
The Final Destination will be opening on Aug 28th in REAL-D and D-Box motion Code seating. So not only will you experience Final Destination 4 in ReelD but you will also get to experience it in D-BOX as well |
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
Originally Posted by AmityBoatTours
(Post 9646008)
Something cool if you are in one of the few cities that has a D-Box equiped theatre.
The Final Destination will be opening on Aug 28th in REAL-D and D-Box motion Code seating. So not only will you experience Final Destination 4 in ReelD but you will also get to experience it in D-BOX as well |
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
The 73" Mitsubishi DLP HDTV I bought last year can handle the new 3-D. Of course, I haven't taken advantage of it yet because it requires special BD's, players, and goggles, but I saw a demo of it at RC Willey last year. It gave the picture a lot of depth, especially between foreground objects and backgrounds, but nothing looked like it was reaching/flying out of the screen like I was used to seeing in theaters with cheap red and green glasses. I didn't buy the TV for the 3-D capability. I bought it for the huge screen, 120hz, and six color guns (whatever they're called).
Like D-Box, I think 3-D is a gimmick. They're both cool, but neither changes the story. They just add another level of thrills, like surround sound did to movies a few years ago, but they're not essential to understand the story. Surround sound is now commonplace and I hate watching a movie without it, but a film's story wouldn't change if I had to watch it without surround sound. From what I've read, ticket sales were suffering from the popularity of home theater and the recession, so movie studios tried to come up with something to entice people back into theaters... just like Cinemascope and 3-D hit movies 50-60 years ago to entice people back into theaters when TV starting gaining popularity. |
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
Originally Posted by Joe Schmoe
(Post 9646312)
The 73" Mitsubishi DLP HDTV I bought last year can handle the new 3-D. Of course, I haven't taken advantage of it yet because it requires special BD's, players, and goggles, but I saw a demo of it at RC Willey last year. It gave the picture a lot of depth, especially between foreground objects and backgrounds, but nothing looked like it was reaching/flying out of the screen like I was used to seeing in theaters with cheap red and green glasses. I didn't buy the TV for the 3-D capability. I bought it for the huge screen, 120hz, and six color guns (whatever they're called).
Like D-Box, I think 3-D is a gimmick. They're both cool, but neither changes the story. They just add another level of thrills, like surround sound did to movies a few years ago, but they're not essential to understand the story. Surround sound is now commonplace and I hate watching a movie without it, but a film's story wouldn't change if I had to watch it without surround sound. From what I've read, ticket sales were suffering from the popularity of home theater and the recession, so movie studios tried to come up with something to entice people back into theaters... just like Cinemascope and 3-D hit movies 50-60 years ago to entice people back into theaters when TV starting gaining popularity. |
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
No thanks to the 3D stuff.
|
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
My 65" Mits DLP says it can handle 3D, but it's a few years old so who knows what spec it's using.
|
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
I saw a new 80-inch DLP at Fry's last week (I'd LOVE to bring that home, but it's $4000). It had a big sign next to it saying it was 3-D ready, followed by in small print "A standard for 3-D on DVD and Blu-Ray disc has not been decided upon yet, possibly this standard will not be compatible with this TV." They had a PC hooked up to it with a 3-D game and the glasses setup, but it was running an anaglyphic version so the electronic glasses didn't do anything.
|
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
Well, maybe if you're lucky, they'll mistakenly price that TV for $10 in an ad. Then you can try to get them to "honor" the ad. You might at least get 20% off for having to suffer in line for an hour before the store opens.
|
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
That is if you don't have a panic attack and die.
|
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
well i have seen 3 movies in D-box in the theatre now, and to me and many others it does add fun to the movie. Sure its not meant for every movie but certain blockbuster, event type films it adds quite a bit to the movie experience. how many movies have you seen in the theatre in D-Box? Iam guessing zero, why dont you make an effort to experience it first before bashing it.
Originally Posted by Blu Man
(Post 9646273)
No, that turns the movie going experience into the theme park experience. Peter Jackson and James Cameron even said that things like that belong in a theme park, not a movie theater. Moving chairs does not help a film maker tell his story any better.
|
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
Originally Posted by AmityBoatTours
(Post 9647363)
well i have seen 3 movies in D-box in the theatre now, and to me and many others it does add fun to the movie. Sure its not meant for every movie but certain blockbuster, event type films it adds quite a bit to the movie experience. how many movies have you seen in the theatre in D-Box? Iam guessing zero, why dont you make an effort to experience it first before bashing it.
3D, if used correctly, can add depth to the image and immerse you into the world the film maker has created. D Box jerks you around for two hours, and makes the movie goer very uncomfortable. D Box is a gimmick. I can see how it might benefit in the video game world, but it has not place in the movie world outside of theme parks. |
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
To me, 3D is a gimmick. I'm not impressed by the whiz-bang the theatre offers. Hell, I still prefer the smaller intimate theatres that offer nothing but the film over the "Silver-City" style massiveness that has all types of activities in the lobby and huge seating capacities, etc. I go to watch the film and don't want to be distracted by amusement park antics.
|
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
Smell-O-Vision or bust!
|
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
Anyone remember Sensurround? It was used as a gimmick in EARTHQUAKE, but as a kid I thought it added to the experience! Kind of sucked when you were in the next theater over though, and you could hear and feel the rumbling.
|
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
Originally Posted by Steve Phillips
(Post 9649723)
Anyone remember Sensurround? It was used as a gimmick in EARTHQUAKE, but as a kid I thought it added to the experience! Kind of sucked when you were in the next theater over though, and you could hear and feel the rumbling.
|
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
But it was LOUD, and that equipment was huge at the time. Funny, the DVD doesn't re-create it at all, but maybe that's just because I'm not 7 years old anymore.
|
Re: 3D Blu-Ray to launch in 2010
Originally Posted by Steve Phillips
(Post 9651939)
But it was LOUD, and that equipment was huge at the time.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.