![]() |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by depooter
(Post 9819097)
time to find a new avatar Gizmo...that Spencer Pratt one is driving me bonkers!
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
^ Please don't taint a holy Star Trek thread with that nonsense. Google it.
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by Numanoid
(Post 9819521)
^ Please don't taint a holy Star Trek thread with that nonsense. Google it.
It's Spencer Pratt. Now move on. |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
This is in my gold box for $20.xx. Do you guys think BB might have it cheaper. I wouldn't mind getting RZ points for it.
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by XavierMike
(Post 9820053)
This is in my gold box for $20.xx. Do you guys think BB might have it cheaper. I wouldn't mind getting RZ points for it.
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by jdslater1
(Post 9819849)
How does he Google a picture of someone he doesn't know the name of?
It's Spencer Pratt. Now move on. |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Those screencaps made me drool.
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by depooter
(Post 9819097)
time to find a new avatar Gizmo...that Spencer Pratt one is driving me bonkers!
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
I don't have any idea who Spencer Pratt is, so I looked him up on Wikipedia.
I still don't have any idea who he is. Maybe he could play Khan in the sequel. |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 9821000)
I don't have any idea who Spencer Pratt is, so I looked him up on Wikipedia.
I still don't have any idea who he is. Maybe he could play Khan in the sequel. For suggesting such a thing, even in jest, I'm going to have to recommend you be :banned:! |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
That Target exclusive actually looks kinda rad. I might have to grab it depending on price.
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by KillerCannibal
(Post 9821439)
That Target exclusive actually looks kinda rad. I might have to grab it depending on price.
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Is the FYE steelbook for the Blu-Ray and the DVD?
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by Geist
(Post 9821499)
Is the FYE steelbook for the Blu-Ray and the DVD?
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by TRC
(Post 9821562)
FYE will only have the DVD steelbook. Future Shop will have the Blu-ray steelbook.
Target it is. Thanks, picture poster. :) |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Anyone know if the Best Buy exclusive insignia pins will be full-sized and/or metal pins?
... |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Come on Walmart... Lower $$ gets me every time! (Hopefully Amazon matches)
I don't need anymore useless toys. |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
|
Originally Posted by asianxcore
(Post 9824508)
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by Chew
(Post 9824886)
Great review.
5/5 for the movie is pure hyperbole. That's a perfect score that should be reserved for proven classics such as Godfather or Lawrence of Arabia. It's a good movie, but certainly not a 5/5 - so when they exaggerate like that, I really can't take the rest of their review seriously. |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 9825276)
No it's not.
5/5 for the movie is pure hyperbole. That's a perfect score that should be reserved for proven classics such as Godfather or Lawrence of Arabia. It's a good movie, but certainly not a 5/5 - so when they exaggerate like that, I really can't take the rest of their review seriously. |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
No, PQ has it's own separate score from the movie - I've seen the movie, so I can take umbrage with that score and extrapolate that they've also exaggerated the other scores - most reviewers tend to do this - even when the movie's really bad, sometimes the other scores seem to suffer as a result.
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 9825276)
No it's not.
5/5 for the movie is pure hyperbole. That's a perfect score that should be reserved for proven classics such as Godfather or Lawrence of Arabia. It's a good movie, but certainly not a 5/5 - so when they exaggerate like that, I really can't take the rest of their review seriously. |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 9825276)
No it's not.
5/5 for the movie is pure hyperbole. That's a perfect score that should be reserved for proven classics such as Godfather or Lawrence of Arabia. It's a good movie, but certainly not a 5/5 - so when they exaggerate like that, I really can't take the rest of their review seriously. |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by mzupeman2
(Post 9825912)
Yes, because newer films simply CANNOT rate a 5/5. What nonsense. I would give this film a 5/5, easy. For how damn good it was, it deserves such a score. Even more impressive is that it was able to hold true to the original series and not make much of the rabid fan base turn on their haunches and say nothing but bad things about this film.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.