The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
#7476
DVD Talk Legend
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Toshiya Fujita’s Lady Snowblood Films Joining The Criterion Collection
http://criterioncast.com/news/toshiy...ion-collection
http://criterioncast.com/news/toshiy...ion-collection
#7478
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
^Can't wait to find out what the extras are!
#7480
#7482
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Western Kentucky
Posts: 2,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Toshiya Fujita’s Lady Snowblood Films Joining The Criterion Collection
http://criterioncast.com/news/toshiy...ion-collection
http://criterioncast.com/news/toshiy...ion-collection
Agreed.
#7487
DVD Talk Legend
#7491
DVD Talk Legend
#7492
DVD Talk Legend
#7494
DVD Talk Legend
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Lost Highway, yes. It's a very underrated movie and the available import Blu-rays are middling quality. It has excellent photography and should look much better.
Inland Empire would be pointless. The movie has no artistic value at all, and it was shot on the cruddiest of cruddy standard-def video at less-than-DVD quality.
Inland Empire would be pointless. The movie has no artistic value at all, and it was shot on the cruddiest of cruddy standard-def video at less-than-DVD quality.
#7495
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
The video could be improved on Blu Ray like Hoop Dreams. As for artistic value it is IMO just as good as MH & LH, but to each their own.
#7496
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: In the straps of boots
Posts: 28,005
Received 1,184 Likes
on
836 Posts
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Ohhhhh.
I'm 100% with you on Lost Highway.
Inland Empire though? Josh is right that it would offer no valuable improvement. The only thing that could be improved is the audio (with lossless), but I don't think it'd be worth it. Otherwise...
Let's focus on one at a time.
Mulholland Drive in 2015.
Lost Highway in 2016 (this is what I wish, not what will come to be)
Inland Empire TBA.
I'm 100% with you on Lost Highway.
Inland Empire though? Josh is right that it would offer no valuable improvement. The only thing that could be improved is the audio (with lossless), but I don't think it'd be worth it. Otherwise...
Let's focus on one at a time.
Mulholland Drive in 2015.
Lost Highway in 2016 (this is what I wish, not what will come to be)
Inland Empire TBA.
#7497
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Formerly known as "Jeffy Pop"/Denver
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I hated Inland Empire the first time I saw it. So glad I gave it a second (and third) chance. It improves exponentially upon repeat viewings.
#7498
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I'd be all over a quality Blu-ray of Lost Highway. Excited for Mulholland Drive!
#7499
DVD Talk Legend
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Not really. Although Hoop Dreams was shot on video, the director made an effort to shoot the movie as well as he could with professional grade video cameras.
David Lynch made no such effort with Inland Empire. He used the lowest quality settings on a consumer camcorder, and shot most of the movie in dimly-lit rooms without bothering to light them.
Also, the reason Hoop Dreams has some room for improvement is that the movie was exported from video to film back in 1994 for the theatrical release prints. Previous home video releases scanned the film export, so it was video-to-film-back-to-video. For the Blu-ray, Criterion has gone straight to the original master tapes and skipped the film step entirely. The resolution is still only standard definition, but it avoids a couple generations of quality loss.
I don't believe that's the case with Inland Empire. I believe the DVD (and the UK Blu-ray, which I have and looks just as bad as the DVD) were video-to-video from the start.
The reason Inland Empire looks terrible is that David Lynch wanted it to look terrible, because he thought it would be funny to make an unwatchable three-hour movie.
I hated Inland Empire the first time I saw it. I watched it again six years later, trying to keep an open mind, and hated it even more.
David Lynch made no such effort with Inland Empire. He used the lowest quality settings on a consumer camcorder, and shot most of the movie in dimly-lit rooms without bothering to light them.
Also, the reason Hoop Dreams has some room for improvement is that the movie was exported from video to film back in 1994 for the theatrical release prints. Previous home video releases scanned the film export, so it was video-to-film-back-to-video. For the Blu-ray, Criterion has gone straight to the original master tapes and skipped the film step entirely. The resolution is still only standard definition, but it avoids a couple generations of quality loss.
I don't believe that's the case with Inland Empire. I believe the DVD (and the UK Blu-ray, which I have and looks just as bad as the DVD) were video-to-video from the start.
The reason Inland Empire looks terrible is that David Lynch wanted it to look terrible, because he thought it would be funny to make an unwatchable three-hour movie.
I hated Inland Empire the first time I saw it. I watched it again six years later, trying to keep an open mind, and hated it even more.
Last edited by Josh Z; 05-04-15 at 12:18 PM.
#7500
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Hilarious. Maybe it's a James Joyce thing where he's secretly a genius and we all need decades to understand it .