Silence of the Lambs question.
#2
DVD Talk Reviewer
Re: Silence of the Lambs question.
Practically. They're very close, but there are a few differences that peek out due to the broader color range available in high-definition -- like more pink-ish skin tones and somewhat less-glaring greens in sunlit exterior shots.
#3
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bay Area, CA
Re: Silence of the Lambs question.
I had the last MGM release DVD before upgrading to the BD last week and the BD disc is so much better. Not a ton of difference but the added clarity and better color are what sold me on it.
#4
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Silence of the Lambs question.
I thought it was a worthy upgrade as well. Pretty good review by Tom Spurlin here:
Silence of the Lambs (BD)
Silence of the Lambs (BD)
#5
#6
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Socal
Re: Silence of the Lambs question.
I own this movie on so many different media's (VHS, Laserdisc, two different DVDs (MGM barebones and the criterion), and now the blu-ray)... I can't believe I keep getting suckered in, but I found the "breaking the silence" feature to be one of the best special features I've sat through in awhile. It actually beats the commentary from the criterion disc IMO
#8
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Silence of the Lambs question.
Really!?! Hmm. I was going to get this release anyway, but I may have to reconsider holding onto the Criterion edition. Space is cramped enough and that commentary was the only reason I was holding onto it...




