AVSFORUM HD Section locked down... how long?
#26
DVD Talk Legend
Attacking another site for their thoughts on the subject.
Attacking other members of the press or media.
Attacking other members of the press or media.
But, in general, I don't see the need for a huge list of rules. Stop the trolling by banning the obvious suspects and the problem solves itself.
#27
Originally Posted by bboisvert
I'm fine with this as long as we have a definition of "attack". Disagreeing with The Digital Bits or some blog on HollywoodInHighDef and pointing out where they are wrong does NOT = an "attack".
But, in general, I don't see the need for a huge list of rules. Stop the trolling by banning the obvious suspects and the problem solves itself.
But, in general, I don't see the need for a huge list of rules. Stop the trolling by banning the obvious suspects and the problem solves itself.
I do think it would be pretty funny though if they banned any slams of bluray.com, while blu-ray.com still kept the now-classic 'rant' thread.

#28
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
Which means AVS will be "can I post this" over and over. Lame.
#29
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tonymontana313
Trust me, this is the right thing to do. Most of the repeat offenders over there do not even think twice before they start spewing venom so hopefully they think twice before posting rubbish now. There are a few of them over there that are quite intelligent such as Grubert but posters like that are far and few between.

But it is true: the signal-to-noise ratio of the forum had gone down the tubes lately. A real shame, because, as other people here have noted, the knowledge base in the rest of the forums is amazing.
hometheaterforum has also enforced a 'no-war-posts' policy.
Originally Posted by bboisvert
I'm fine with this as long as we have a definition of "attack".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "argument to the person", "argument against the man") consists of replying to an argument or factual claim by attacking or appealing to a characteristic or belief of the person making the argument or claim, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument or producing evidence against the claim. The process of proving or disproving the claims is thereby subverted, and the argumentum ad hominem works to change the subject.
#30
DVD Talk Special Edition
Ah, but what about a person's credibility or motivations? It can be useful in an argument to point out that the person making a particular argument has a vested interest in the subject matter (e.g. they might be an industry insider) or a documented history of biased posts in order to assess the weight to be given to that person's argument. Happens in courts every day, where such "ad hominem attacks" are not only allowed but actually encouraged.
Anyway, I think the new AVS rules are too draconian and, if strictly enforced, will stifle too much legitimate discourse, especially with regard to challenging authority figures and websites. But then I actually enjoyed the mudslinging in a perverse kind of way. When I want sane and measured discussion of HDM, I usually just come here.
Anyway, I think the new AVS rules are too draconian and, if strictly enforced, will stifle too much legitimate discourse, especially with regard to challenging authority figures and websites. But then I actually enjoyed the mudslinging in a perverse kind of way. When I want sane and measured discussion of HDM, I usually just come here.
#31
DVD Talk Legend
You know when it comes down to it, what legitimate reasons are there to specifically discuss the war or competition in the context of who's winning?
You could say it benefits people waiting to jump in to see "the facts", but honestly, I feel sorry for anyone that has visited AVS looking for sane and impartial feedback on HDM.
All of the BS that happens there is between members who already own one or both formats, and are sticking with their choices. So, why do they even need to address each other at all?
If you have HD DVD, stick in the HD DVD sections, and talk about your chosen formats. And that should include the ability to say you're disappointed with some aspect of the format without being attacked.
Same goes for Blu-Ray. If you're a Blu-Ray only guy, you don't have to show up in a bunch of threads saying HD DVD is done, etc., etc.
If you own both formats and are TRULY neutral (because many that do are not), then you should be able to discuss both formats reasonably.
The measures they have imposed IMO will help immensely if enforced. If their aim is to bring the HDM forums inline with the level and quality of discourse elsewhere on AVS, draconian is probably the only thing that has a chance of accomplishing it.
You could say it benefits people waiting to jump in to see "the facts", but honestly, I feel sorry for anyone that has visited AVS looking for sane and impartial feedback on HDM.
All of the BS that happens there is between members who already own one or both formats, and are sticking with their choices. So, why do they even need to address each other at all?
If you have HD DVD, stick in the HD DVD sections, and talk about your chosen formats. And that should include the ability to say you're disappointed with some aspect of the format without being attacked.
Same goes for Blu-Ray. If you're a Blu-Ray only guy, you don't have to show up in a bunch of threads saying HD DVD is done, etc., etc.
If you own both formats and are TRULY neutral (because many that do are not), then you should be able to discuss both formats reasonably.
The measures they have imposed IMO will help immensely if enforced. If their aim is to bring the HDM forums inline with the level and quality of discourse elsewhere on AVS, draconian is probably the only thing that has a chance of accomplishing it.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well said bunkaroo. I hate to bring it up again, but that "nerd on nerd carnage" post here (classic by the way) really tells the story. It's either 12-year olds who are doing the flaming, or they're just nerds with nothing better to do. Like you said, there's really no reason to post anything negative about either format. You makes your choices, and you takes your chances. Beyond that, there are likely so many factors involved with this format "war" that we don't know the details of that it's just silly to bicker about.
But again, there are apparently plenty of 12-year olds or nerds out there who just don't have much better to do than argue about a stinkin' HD format. The whole concept of HD media is fun (at least for most of us)--since diving into HD-DVD a few months ago, watching many of these movies again on HD-DVD has been a real revelation. I'm sure the blu-ray folks feel the same way. And it will shake out one way or the other, regardless of what any of us say to one another.
But again, there are apparently plenty of 12-year olds or nerds out there who just don't have much better to do than argue about a stinkin' HD format. The whole concept of HD media is fun (at least for most of us)--since diving into HD-DVD a few months ago, watching many of these movies again on HD-DVD has been a real revelation. I'm sure the blu-ray folks feel the same way. And it will shake out one way or the other, regardless of what any of us say to one another.
#34
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tonymontana313
Most of the repeat offenders over there do not even think twice before they start spewing venom so hopefully they think twice before posting rubbish now.
If this fails, then I really think they should just create a new war forum with no rules, no guidance and no moderation. Just set them loose in there and shut the door.
#35
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 27,528
Received 1,514 Likes
on
993 Posts
Originally Posted by MEJHarrison
If this fails, then I really think they should just create a new war forum with no rules, no guidance and no moderation. Just set them loose in there and shut the door.
The best solution, of course, would be if people would grow up.
#36
Cool New Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would love to see the likes of Rdjam, Beatboy and TheBland just to name some annoying idiots to get kicked of from that forum. It must be quite a shock for some of those 24/7 fanboy posters to not be allowed to say what they feel like saying on there.
#39
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bunkaroo
A couple of knuckleheads tried to derail the Nielsen thread, but it looks like the mods stepped up.
#42
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Elemental
I would love to see the likes of Rdjam, Beatboy and TheBland just to name some annoying idiots to get kicked of from that forum. It must be quite a shock for some of those 24/7 fanboy posters to not be allowed to say what they feel like saying on there.
#43
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Josh Z
The problem with hugely partisan issues such as this format war (or politics, or religion, or competing video game consoles, or PC vs. Mac, etc.) is that they drive otherwise reasonable people to irrational behavior. Both thebland and rdjam have participated usefully in other forums on that site (Beatboy not so much), but when it comes to High-Def media the "war" mentality takes them over.
#46
DVD Talk Hero
Nice. I got suspended because I wrote "Another Cancellation?" in regards to Dancing with the Wolves on Blu-ray. Who cares if I was actually looking forward to it and own a Blu-ray Player. I hope AVS is ready to lose a ton of members and ad revenue as they will be suspending/banning people over there for the stupidest things.
#48
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
Nice. I got suspended because I wrote "Another Cancellation?" in regards to Dancing with the Wolves on Blu-ray. Who cares if I was actually looking forward to it and own a Blu-ray Player. I hope AVS is ready to lose a ton of members and ad revenue as they will be suspending/banning people over there for the stupidest things.