is this correct, or ignorant?
#1
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
is this correct, or ignorant?
I was overhearing a discussion that was pretty much saying HD is a scam for TVs less than 50" and that 1080p TVs look exactly the same as 720p on upscaled DVD.
Is that true? So would getting a 1080p 46" samsung be a waste?
Is that true? So would getting a 1080p 46" samsung be a waste?
#4
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by CloverClover
Is that true? So would getting a 1080p 46" samsung be a waste?
#5
Banned by request
Also, viewing distance plays a part in here. The further back you sit from the screen, the larger the screen has to be in order for you to see all the detail provided by the higher resolution. If you sit closer to your TV, even at 46" you'll want the highest resolution you can get.
At the same time, you'll want to consider the price difference. How much more is it for 1080p vs. 720P? With hardware prices dropping all the time, you may find that the 1080p set is not much more expensive than the 720p set.
At the same time, you'll want to consider the price difference. How much more is it for 1080p vs. 720P? With hardware prices dropping all the time, you may find that the 1080p set is not much more expensive than the 720p set.
#6
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Jersey
yeah. if you are sitting more than 6' away from your 46", it wont make a difference. i doubt there is much of a price difference between that and the 720p model so I would just go for it.
#7
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Manassas, VA
From the smaller screens I have seen, 1080p is kinda wasteful at such a small screen as 46". I started noticing improvments with 53"+ screens with 1080p. But, Viewing distance does play part into it, so you can have a smaller screen but if you sit real close it will be better. I ended up going with a 61" 1080p DLP Sammy
#12
DVD Talk Legend
I went from a 46" 1080i CRT RPTV to a 52" 720P LCD RPTV and notice very little difference from where I sit. In the end screen size was more of a benefit than resolution.
#13
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by darkside
I went from a 46" 1080i CRT RPTV to a 52" 720P LCD RPTV and notice very little difference from where I sit. In the end screen size was more of a benefit than resolution.
#14
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mpls, MN
Originally Posted by Ocelot
who sits more than 10 feet from the TV now a day?
Originally Posted by kefrank
well, technically 1080i is greater resolution than 720p (1920x1080 vs. 1280x720). it's hard to directly compare a CRT to an LCD though, as the CRT doesn't really have a fixed-pixel resolution. i'm not sure that a 1080i CRT actually has an effective horizontal resolution of 1920 pixels.
Just to add to Suprmallet's list from post #5, PC usage is another factor to consider for 1080. If you plan on using a computer hooked to the TV at all, you usually want the best resolution you can afford. It's easier to see the difference with this kind of source.
#15
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by kefrank
well, technically 1080i is greater resolution than 720p (1920x1080 vs. 1280x720). it's hard to directly compare a CRT to an LCD though, as the CRT doesn't really have a fixed-pixel resolution. i'm not sure that a 1080i CRT actually has an effective horizontal resolution of 1920 pixels.
#16
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by Ocelot
who sits more than 10 feet from the TV now a day?The chart Lizard linked to is a fantastic summary IMO.
I'm sitting about 13 feet from my 115" and that means about 12ft from the 37" (used during the day normally and right now as the projector is out on RMA).





