Is anyone still holding out and why?
#51
Originally Posted by tonyjg
99% seem muddy or like you're watching through a screen door - this is something of an exaggeration !!??!!
watch are you watching HD on ???
and since most guys in here would have decent gadgets - how about some screen shots to prove this ??
watch are you watching HD on ???
and since most guys in here would have decent gadgets - how about some screen shots to prove this ??
#52
New Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DVD Polizei
When you compare a superior resolution image which you've seen for the first time, and then compare it to what you've been seeing for years, your eyes do in fact tell you that what you thought was clear all these years, is not that clear at all.
This is where the high definition folks miss the point. The average viewer doesn't care one bit about a crystal clear image. The average viewer is watching on a screen that's 30" or less. To him, high definition is completely meaningless - he's not going to see a better image because his TV can't give it to him anyway. High definition Blu-Ray DVD players have one advantage that Joe Sixpack can understand, and that is that they can fit 22 hours of SD playback on a single disc. THAT'S where Blu-Ray can show its advantages to the average Joe. They can release thousands of movies in high def and a few thousand high def fans will switch, but until Joe Sixpack can buy a full season of his favourite SD TV show on a single inexpensive Blu-Ray disc he's not going to see any reason to switch from SD to HD.
As for me personally, I'm holding out for the Samsung Duo-HD player that's coming for Christmas. I don't care about the format war and I have no preference between Blu-Ray and HD-DVD because cuirrently Blu-Ray is not taking advantage of its additional storage space. In my view Blu-Ray is only superficially better than HD-DVD. Until it becomes materially better I'm sitting on the fence.
Last edited by Beery; 10-09-07 at 10:16 AM.
#53
Originally Posted by Beery
I don't care about the format war and I have no preference between Blu-Ray and HD-DVD because cuirrently Blu-Ray is not taking advantage of its additional storage space.
#54
DVD Talk Hero
I've been holding out for the following reasons...
1) Software Availability. So far, there just hasn't been enough software released to either format that really interests me. Though that is beginning to change with releases like Halloween, Dawn of the Dead, Day of the Dead, Blade Runner, Kubricks, etc.
2) Disappointing Software Titles. The controversy over Bram Stoker's Dracula (another title that would normally interest me) being the most recent example. The BR Robocop is an inferior version to the new DVD SE (not being the unrated version being the main example). Terminator is a barebones release. Serenity isn't the recently released SE. Dune doesn't have the extended cut found on the steelbook DVD. Halloween is just a port of the most recent DVD -- why not include the extended TV version on the disc via branching?
3) Waiting for the technology to stabilize. The format war is a part of this. There's also the firmware issue, disc compatability with certain players, not having finalized BR specs. Seems like Toshiba and (especially) Sony are still feeling out what they want their formats to be. And I'm left wondering if that $1000 dual-format Samsung player I've been eyeing will play triple-layer HD-DVDs and BJD 2.0 discs in a year or two.
4) Still seems like it costs too much. Still looking at somewhere between $500 and $1000 to be format neutral. Discs are in the $25-$30 neighborhood. I'm used to paying between $5 and $10 for almost any DVD I want. I bought my first DVD player in '98 for about $300, so I've already gone through the early adopter experience. Also helped by online retailers burning through inverstment capital, so I could get a lot of discs cheaply of movies I'd never seen before, so the idea of paying over $20 for old movies I've already seen numerous times doesn't have much appeal to me.
1) Software Availability. So far, there just hasn't been enough software released to either format that really interests me. Though that is beginning to change with releases like Halloween, Dawn of the Dead, Day of the Dead, Blade Runner, Kubricks, etc.
2) Disappointing Software Titles. The controversy over Bram Stoker's Dracula (another title that would normally interest me) being the most recent example. The BR Robocop is an inferior version to the new DVD SE (not being the unrated version being the main example). Terminator is a barebones release. Serenity isn't the recently released SE. Dune doesn't have the extended cut found on the steelbook DVD. Halloween is just a port of the most recent DVD -- why not include the extended TV version on the disc via branching?
3) Waiting for the technology to stabilize. The format war is a part of this. There's also the firmware issue, disc compatability with certain players, not having finalized BR specs. Seems like Toshiba and (especially) Sony are still feeling out what they want their formats to be. And I'm left wondering if that $1000 dual-format Samsung player I've been eyeing will play triple-layer HD-DVDs and BJD 2.0 discs in a year or two.
4) Still seems like it costs too much. Still looking at somewhere between $500 and $1000 to be format neutral. Discs are in the $25-$30 neighborhood. I'm used to paying between $5 and $10 for almost any DVD I want. I bought my first DVD player in '98 for about $300, so I've already gone through the early adopter experience. Also helped by online retailers burning through inverstment capital, so I could get a lot of discs cheaply of movies I'd never seen before, so the idea of paying over $20 for old movies I've already seen numerous times doesn't have much appeal to me.
#55
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For the folks who argue that it would be crazy not to get an HD-DVD player right now instead of a SD player, I might be persuaded if they would meet my region-free needs. However, it is my understanding that they don't.
#56
DVD Talk Legend
I'm holding out because I refuse to finance this format war. As soon as some of my favorite films are available on HD-VMD I'll be picking up a player.
#57
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
Dune doesn't have the extended cut found on the steelbook DVD.
#58
Originally Posted by vjack99
For the folks who argue that it would be crazy not to get an HD-DVD player right now instead of a SD player, I might be persuaded if they would meet my region-free needs. However, it is my understanding that they don't.
#59
DVD Talk Limited Edition
I was a holdout too, but the 360 addon for $150 was worth trying for me. I soon upgraded to the A2 for $300 plus Matrix + 2 freebies + the 5 freebies and ebayed the addon for $150.
I'm not back-upgrading movies. But new purchases are the HD version, and upgrading of our most favorite movies (for me, Eternal Sunshine & 12 Monkeys).
I don't pay $30 for hd-dvds. We've forked out $20-$23 for a few new releases (300, Children of Men) but other than that we've been picking them up on sales and deals for about $15-$18 tops. Then again we've only got about 25 total HD-DVDs.
Both formats are here to stay. A few more years and it'll be like +R and -R again - mostly combo players. This isn't the era of the betamax tape not fitting in the VHS deck.
I'm not back-upgrading movies. But new purchases are the HD version, and upgrading of our most favorite movies (for me, Eternal Sunshine & 12 Monkeys).
I don't pay $30 for hd-dvds. We've forked out $20-$23 for a few new releases (300, Children of Men) but other than that we've been picking them up on sales and deals for about $15-$18 tops. Then again we've only got about 25 total HD-DVDs.
Both formats are here to stay. A few more years and it'll be like +R and -R again - mostly combo players. This isn't the era of the betamax tape not fitting in the VHS deck.
#60
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PopcornTreeCt
If you already have a region free DVD player then its a non-issue. Just hold onto it. All HD-DVDs can play in all HD-DVD players.
#61
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by vjack99
So then I'd need to have 3 DVD players in my system (i.e., a SD region-free, HD-DVD, and Blu)? I think I'll wait until this silly format war is over.
#62
Banned
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a PS3, but haven't bought any Blu-Rays. How corny is it that if I buy a movie, I most likely won't be able to play it at a friend/family/significant othe'rs house? Thats my holdout so far.
#63
I want to upgrade from Standard DVD to High Definition, either BluRay or HD-DVD, but I will not buy one player until this format war is ended. They are being so stupid cause there are alot of people like me who are just waiting to leap into this market and start buying all the movies I have in 1080, but I am not going to get caugh until one format wins.
#65
Originally Posted by vjack99
So then I'd need to have 3 DVD players in my system (i.e., a SD region-free, HD-DVD, and Blu)? I think I'll wait until this silly format war is over.
Originally Posted by DVD Polizei
When you compare a superior resolution image which you've seen for the first time, and then compare it to what you've been seeing for years, your eyes do in fact tell you that what you thought was clear all these years, is not that clear at all.
#66
Originally Posted by Beery
Yeah, but the thing is, it really doesn't matter. I have a 61" TV and an up-converting standard DVD player and I also have a cable provider that gives me high def movies. I've watched the movie 'Serenity' on both and sure there's a difference when you make a side-by-side comparison - the high definition image is sharper. But it's not that much sharper and when I watch a movie I'm not interested in seeing individual strands of a character's hair. All I'm really interested in is the plot and the action.
Most people who are currently into HD, are in fact interested in seeing the small details of a movie. Your eyes naturally capture it, and it also gives more artistic quality to the plot of the movie, because the director wants you to see something, which you might have normally missed otherwise.
Originally Posted by Beery
This is where the high definition folks miss the point. The average viewer doesn't care one bit about a crystal clear image. The average viewer is watching on a screen that's 30" or less. To him, high definition is completely meaningless - he's not going to see a better image because his TV can't give it to him anyway. High definition Blu-Ray DVD players have one advantage that Joe Sixpack can understand, and that is that they can fit 22 hours of SD playback on a single disc. THAT'S where Blu-Ray can show its advantages to the average Joe. They can release thousands of movies in high def and a few thousand high def fans will switch, but until Joe Sixpack can buy a full season of his favourite SD TV show on a single inexpensive Blu-Ray disc he's not going to see any reason to switch from SD to HD.
At this point, fitting so many hours of SD DVD content on a disc is pointless. Do you really think this is going to matter, especially when SD DVD content on HD media is not the major concern of the movie labels at the moment, and probably will never be--in other words, don't expect the entire season 1 of 24 on one HD disc. Won't happen. The features from a 2-disc SD DVD edition are the most any movie company is going to worry about on HD discs. They want you to buy high-def. So, we won't be seeing any help from them anytime soon.
Now, when HD media become affordable, and you can burn dozens of hours SD DVD content on one disc, this will be great, but you forget HD is catching on. People like it once they see it. And they will want to record HD content as well. So, while recording SD DVD content on HD media will be nice, I don't think it's going to catch on as much as you might think it is.
The key to making HD content the new standard, is making sure people SEE IT in person. Telling them that HD content is the way to go, doesn't mean much. The person must see HD content in person. Everyone I've demonstrated my HD DVD movies to, love it. They want it. And when telling them that HD DVD players are not outrageously expensive, but can be purchased for only $200, is making this even more tempting.
The usual process of getting into HD, is just buying an HDTV, then receiving HD content from the cable provider. This might actually hinder HD DVD player sales by 20-30% (my estimate) because people won't want to buy the discs and the players. However, I do believe eventually cable-HD-only viewers will buy the hardware, but just not as soon as what the HD market would want.
#67
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Ketchup
I have a PS3, but haven't bought any Blu-Rays. How corny is it that if I buy a movie, I most likely won't be able to play it at a friend/family/significant othe'rs house? Thats my holdout so far.
#68
Still holding out.
Why? Because most of the movies I own and/or watch are put out by :
Image
Criterion
Kino
New Yorker
Masters of Cinema
Wellspring
Koch Lorber
Synapse
Blue Underground
etc.
Why? Because most of the movies I own and/or watch are put out by :
Image
Criterion
Kino
New Yorker
Masters of Cinema
Wellspring
Koch Lorber
Synapse
Blue Underground
etc.
#69
I got a bunch of gift certificates for Best Buy for my birthday, probably around $300.00, and I was actually going to buy an HD Player, but this damn format war made me hold off until it is settled. It drives me nuts cause I was at Best Buy looking at HD-DVD & BluRay players, and I just wont delve into this market until the war is over.
#70
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by coli
I got a bunch of gift certificates for Best Buy for my birthday, probably around $300.00, and I was actually going to buy an HD Player, but this damn format war made me hold off until it is settled. It drives me nuts cause I was at Best Buy looking at HD-DVD & BluRay players, and I just wont delve into this market until the war is over.
Well, your certificates might be expired by the time that happens.
Look at the titles for each, and pick the one side that has more of the titles you like. 6 months from now, the war will still be going on, and you can then purchase the other one.
#72
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bend, Oregon
I have an HD-A1 that works reasonably well, but my biggest gripe is with the HD-DVD discs in general. They can be glitchy during playback and scratch way too easily. It leads me to think sometimes that I should have waited till the format matures and becomes more reliable. Nowadays, I tend to heavily scrutinize every HD-DVD release before committing my money.
Last edited by tofferman; 10-22-07 at 11:24 AM.
#73
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm willing to wait until 2009.
I suspect Best Buy sells other stuff than HD players & titles. So that gift certificate doesn't have to expire, it can still be used on anything from a washing machine to a digital camera.
I suspect Best Buy sells other stuff than HD players & titles. So that gift certificate doesn't have to expire, it can still be used on anything from a washing machine to a digital camera.
#74
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by pricdews
I'm willing to wait until 2009.
#75
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by pricdews
I'm willing to wait until 2009.



