Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

Star Trek On HD DVD

Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

Star Trek On HD DVD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-07 | 10:39 PM
  #1  
buckee1's Avatar
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Minding the precious things in the Local Shop
Star Trek On HD DVD

Just finished watching an 8 minute promo for the release of the re-mastered 1st season of the original series and it looks pretty frickin' pehnomenal to say the least!

So is it a forgone conclusion that Paramount/CBS will go back and remaster TNG, DS9, VOY and ENT all for HD DVD re-issues?

www.startrek.com -Linky for the promo for those who are interested.
Old 08-31-07 | 10:49 PM
  #2  
Deftones's Avatar
DVD Talk God
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 83,612
Received 2,061 Likes on 1,389 Posts
From: Arizona
ENT would be no problem since it was shot in HD. The rest would require probably as much, if not more work than the TOS.
Old 09-01-07 | 01:12 AM
  #3  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
If Paramount sees the potential for profit, then yes. I think it will depend upon the sales of this first set.
Old 09-01-07 | 01:49 AM
  #4  
The Cow's Avatar
Premium Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 25,143
Received 1,214 Likes on 783 Posts
From: Grazing in a field somewhere...
They are enhancing a Gorn to blink his eyelids?!?! Paramount is raping my childhood, or something.

Some kinda cool stuff, but Star Trek series don't come cheap.

I could be wrong, but I really don't see them doing anything to the other series. The changes to those series would be much more subtle and I don't think it would be profitable.

Here's the direct link for media player stream: http://www.startrek.com/startrek/videoview?id=2305833
Old 09-01-07 | 03:09 AM
  #5  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 10,521
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Lower Beaver, Iowa
The problem with the other series ("Enterprise" may be an exception to this) is that, although they were shot on film, the film was immediately transferred to SD video for all of the post-production work, including editing. And the special effects were rendered in SD. So, every episode would have to have its original camera negatives transferred to HD, then the editing would have to be done over, and the effects would have to be redone. I don't even want to think about what that would cost or how much time it would take.
Old 09-01-07 | 04:08 AM
  #6  
The Cow's Avatar
Premium Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 25,143
Received 1,214 Likes on 783 Posts
From: Grazing in a field somewhere...
Originally Posted by Mr. Salty
The problem with the other series ("Enterprise" may be an exception to this) is that, although they were shot on film, the film was immediately transferred to SD video for all of the post-production work, including editing. And the special effects were rendered in SD. So, every episode would have to have its original camera negatives transferred to HD, then the editing would have to be done over, and the effects would have to be redone. I don't even want to think about what that would cost or how much time it would take.
(i've already stated my opinion..)

Do you have a link for all of that? Does the film not still exist?

Regardless, I think the OP already understands what you said. I think his point is that they did all of that with TOS, why wouldn't they do that with the other series.
Old 09-01-07 | 05:38 AM
  #7  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Montreal, Canada
Originally Posted by The Cow
They are enhancing a Gorn to blink his eyelids?!?! Paramount is raping my childhood, or something.

Some kinda cool stuff, but Star Trek series don't come cheap.

http://www.startrek.com/startrek/videoview?id=2305833[/url]
Amazon.com has a pre-order price of $138.95. That's very reasonable
Old 09-01-07 | 05:45 AM
  #8  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Originally Posted by The Cow
(i've already stated my opinion..)

Do you have a link for all of that? Does the film not still exist?

Regardless, I think the OP already understands what you said. I think his point is that they did all of that with TOS, why wouldn't they do that with the other series.
No, no, no. I don't think you're understanding. TOS was shot and edited on film. Any effects work was done on film. Thus, all Paramount had to do was clean up the film, add the new effects, and it's ready to go.

TNG, DS9, and Voyager were shot on film. Then, all of the footage was transferred to SD video for editing and FX work. So, the only footage Paramount has that would gain any kind of benefit from being transferred to HD is the original raw footage, unedited and without any of the effects that were added in post. So Paramount would have to clean up pretty much all the raw footage, and then edit and add FX from there. My big worry is that they may decide to change some of the cuts if they're already bothering to re-edit it.
Old 09-01-07 | 08:06 AM
  #9  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know if Paramount even kept the raw footage around?
Hollywood has such a great track record of taking care of the final elements, who knows WTF they did the raw material.
Old 09-01-07 | 08:14 AM
  #10  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Considering how much of a cash cow ST is for Paramount, I'd assume they did. On the other hand, this IS Hollywood. If Fox and Lucas could let Star Wars degenerate, who knows what's happened to the raw TNG footage.
Old 09-01-07 | 08:20 AM
  #11  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 11,957
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
From: Pa
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
Considering how much of a cash cow ST is for Paramount, I'd assume they did. On the other hand, this IS Hollywood. If Fox and Lucas could let Star Wars degenerate, who knows what's happened to the raw TNG footage.
I wouldn't bet on that though. Don't forget Paramount is the studio that didn't want to clean up what was left of The Godfather!
Old 09-01-07 | 08:23 AM
  #12  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,058
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Deftones
ENT would be no problem since it was shot in HD. The rest would require probably as much, if not more work than the TOS.
I was under the impression that ENT didn't switch over to HD until midway through its second season. It was always 16:9, just not HD.
Old 09-01-07 | 08:39 AM
  #13  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,692
Received 2,796 Likes on 1,859 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by Tracer Bullet
I was under the impression that ENT didn't switch over to HD until midway through its second season. It was always 16:9, just not HD.
The first season has aired in high-def on HDNet, so high-def masters are definitely floating around.

(I believe the first season was shot on film, and for budgetary reasons, the show switched to HD cameras from then on.)
Old 09-01-07 | 10:23 AM
  #14  
Deftones's Avatar
DVD Talk God
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 83,612
Received 2,061 Likes on 1,389 Posts
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by Tracer Bullet
I was under the impression that ENT didn't switch over to HD until midway through its second season. It was always 16:9, just not HD.
As Adam said, it's on HDNET, and the quality is identical to season two. So, I'd assume, even if they didn't shoot specifically in HD, they have HD masters.
Old 09-01-07 | 05:26 PM
  #15  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Originally Posted by DthRdrX
I wouldn't bet on that though. Don't forget Paramount is the studio that didn't want to clean up what was left of The Godfather!
The Godfather never has and never will make as much money as the Star Trek franchise.
Old 09-01-07 | 06:17 PM
  #16  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 10,521
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Lower Beaver, Iowa
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
If Fox and Lucas could let Star Wars degenerate, who knows what's happened to the raw TNG footage.
Fox and Lucas didn't "let" "Star Wars" degenerate. The film negative was stored in a state-of-the-art archival facility with perfect climate control conditions. You couldn't ask for better treatment. However, the movie was shot on a Kodak film stock that turned out to be highly unstable. The degradation was inevitable.

To answer The Cow's question, I'm sure the film negatives for TNG still exists, but as someone else said, it's the raw, unedited footage.
Old 09-01-07 | 06:50 PM
  #17  
The Cow's Avatar
Premium Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 25,143
Received 1,214 Likes on 783 Posts
From: Grazing in a field somewhere...
Originally Posted by Mr. Salty
To answer The Cow's question, I'm sure the film negatives for TNG still exists, but as someone else said, it's the raw, unedited footage.
Thanks! I didn't know the edits came after the transfer.
Old 09-02-07 | 12:20 AM
  #18  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Midlothian, VA
Originally Posted by shanester
Amazon.com has a pre-order price of $138.95. That's very reasonable
I think some people (like myself) would view anything over $100 as NOT reasonable....
Then again, just IMHO....I would never pay over $100 for a season of ANY show, high-def or not...even for my favorite show of all time, Buffy....most I have ever spent was almost $70 (and actually, that was for ST:TOS when it came out in season sets on standard DVD)....

My other beef is with the combo release....I wish they'd just kill all those discs right now, anyone from Paramount, Warner and Universal listening? (Probably not)
Old 09-02-07 | 01:09 AM
  #19  
kvrdave's Avatar
DVD Talk God
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 86,231
Received 44 Likes on 26 Posts
From: Pacific NW
Tough call. This really looks fantastic, but the price is really high. At the same time, I don't want it to fail and they don't release the other seasons, etc. But I don't mind waiting the price out.
Old 09-02-07 | 01:14 AM
  #20  
kvrdave's Avatar
DVD Talk God
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 86,231
Received 44 Likes on 26 Posts
From: Pacific NW
Thought about ordering it to see if the 10% off might apply. It didn't. Hopefully they fix that.
Old 09-02-07 | 02:39 AM
  #21  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
They'll apply it if you email them. I'm sure it will get added on in a few days.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.