Star Trek On HD DVD
#1
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Minding the precious things in the Local Shop
Star Trek On HD DVD
Just finished watching an 8 minute promo for the release of the re-mastered 1st season of the original series and it looks pretty frickin' pehnomenal to say the least!
So is it a forgone conclusion that Paramount/CBS will go back and remaster TNG, DS9, VOY and ENT all for HD DVD re-issues?
www.startrek.com -Linky for the promo for those who are interested.
So is it a forgone conclusion that Paramount/CBS will go back and remaster TNG, DS9, VOY and ENT all for HD DVD re-issues?
www.startrek.com -Linky for the promo for those who are interested.
#2
DVD Talk God
ENT would be no problem since it was shot in HD. The rest would require probably as much, if not more work than the TOS.
#4
Premium Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 25,143
Received 1,214 Likes
on
783 Posts
From: Grazing in a field somewhere...
They are enhancing a Gorn to blink his eyelids?!?! Paramount is raping my childhood, or something.
Some kinda cool stuff, but Star Trek series don't come cheap.
I could be wrong, but I really don't see them doing anything to the other series. The changes to those series would be much more subtle and I don't think it would be profitable.
Here's the direct link for media player stream: http://www.startrek.com/startrek/videoview?id=2305833
Some kinda cool stuff, but Star Trek series don't come cheap.
I could be wrong, but I really don't see them doing anything to the other series. The changes to those series would be much more subtle and I don't think it would be profitable.
Here's the direct link for media player stream: http://www.startrek.com/startrek/videoview?id=2305833
#5
DVD Talk Legend
The problem with the other series ("Enterprise" may be an exception to this) is that, although they were shot on film, the film was immediately transferred to SD video for all of the post-production work, including editing. And the special effects were rendered in SD. So, every episode would have to have its original camera negatives transferred to HD, then the editing would have to be done over, and the effects would have to be redone. I don't even want to think about what that would cost or how much time it would take.
#6
Premium Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 25,143
Received 1,214 Likes
on
783 Posts
From: Grazing in a field somewhere...
Originally Posted by Mr. Salty
The problem with the other series ("Enterprise" may be an exception to this) is that, although they were shot on film, the film was immediately transferred to SD video for all of the post-production work, including editing. And the special effects were rendered in SD. So, every episode would have to have its original camera negatives transferred to HD, then the editing would have to be done over, and the effects would have to be redone. I don't even want to think about what that would cost or how much time it would take.
Do you have a link for all of that? Does the film not still exist?
Regardless, I think the OP already understands what you said. I think his point is that they did all of that with TOS, why wouldn't they do that with the other series.
#7
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Montreal, Canada
Originally Posted by The Cow
They are enhancing a Gorn to blink his eyelids?!?! Paramount is raping my childhood, or something.
Some kinda cool stuff, but Star Trek series don't come cheap.
http://www.startrek.com/startrek/videoview?id=2305833[/url]
Some kinda cool stuff, but Star Trek series don't come cheap.
http://www.startrek.com/startrek/videoview?id=2305833[/url]
#8
Banned by request
Originally Posted by The Cow
(i've already stated my opinion..)
Do you have a link for all of that? Does the film not still exist?
Regardless, I think the OP already understands what you said. I think his point is that they did all of that with TOS, why wouldn't they do that with the other series.
Do you have a link for all of that? Does the film not still exist?
Regardless, I think the OP already understands what you said. I think his point is that they did all of that with TOS, why wouldn't they do that with the other series.
TNG, DS9, and Voyager were shot on film. Then, all of the footage was transferred to SD video for editing and FX work. So, the only footage Paramount has that would gain any kind of benefit from being transferred to HD is the original raw footage, unedited and without any of the effects that were added in post. So Paramount would have to clean up pretty much all the raw footage, and then edit and add FX from there. My big worry is that they may decide to change some of the cuts if they're already bothering to re-edit it.
#9
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anyone know if Paramount even kept the raw footage around?
Hollywood has such a great track record of taking care of the final elements, who knows WTF they did the raw material.
Hollywood has such a great track record of taking care of the final elements, who knows WTF they did the raw material.
#10
Banned by request
Considering how much of a cash cow ST is for Paramount, I'd assume they did. On the other hand, this IS Hollywood. If Fox and Lucas could let Star Wars degenerate, who knows what's happened to the raw TNG footage.
#11
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
Considering how much of a cash cow ST is for Paramount, I'd assume they did. On the other hand, this IS Hollywood. If Fox and Lucas could let Star Wars degenerate, who knows what's happened to the raw TNG footage.
#12
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by Deftones
ENT would be no problem since it was shot in HD. The rest would require probably as much, if not more work than the TOS.
#13
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,692
Received 2,796 Likes
on
1,859 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by Tracer Bullet
I was under the impression that ENT didn't switch over to HD until midway through its second season. It was always 16:9, just not HD.
(I believe the first season was shot on film, and for budgetary reasons, the show switched to HD cameras from then on.)
#14
DVD Talk God
Originally Posted by Tracer Bullet
I was under the impression that ENT didn't switch over to HD until midway through its second season. It was always 16:9, just not HD.
#15
Banned by request
Originally Posted by DthRdrX
I wouldn't bet on that though. Don't forget Paramount is the studio that didn't want to clean up what was left of The Godfather!
#16
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
If Fox and Lucas could let Star Wars degenerate, who knows what's happened to the raw TNG footage.
To answer The Cow's question, I'm sure the film negatives for TNG still exists, but as someone else said, it's the raw, unedited footage.
#17
Premium Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 25,143
Received 1,214 Likes
on
783 Posts
From: Grazing in a field somewhere...
Originally Posted by Mr. Salty
To answer The Cow's question, I'm sure the film negatives for TNG still exists, but as someone else said, it's the raw, unedited footage.
#18
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Midlothian, VA
Originally Posted by shanester
Amazon.com has a pre-order price of $138.95. That's very reasonable 

Then again, just IMHO....I would never pay over $100 for a season of ANY show, high-def or not...even for my favorite show of all time, Buffy....most I have ever spent was almost $70 (and actually, that was for ST:TOS when it came out in season sets on standard DVD)....
My other beef is with the combo release....I wish they'd just kill all those discs right now, anyone from Paramount, Warner and Universal listening? (Probably not)
#19
DVD Talk God
Tough call. This really looks fantastic, but the price is really high. At the same time, I don't want it to fail and they don't release the other seasons, etc. But I don't mind waiting the price out.




